Smallest Pulley?
Smallest Pulley?
Hey guys this isn't the average noob thread of hey can i run a 2.5 on stock injectors lol.
Anyways, I have every cooling mod in the book what is the smallest pulley that would be wise and efficient to run? With a 3gph meth nozzle I am not seeing 140 iat2's, not even on the dyno with less air flow.
I need more power and until I get the ported intake and the killerchiller THIS MONTH
, I am going to swap pulleys.
What would be the lowest pulley I could run and still be "smart" about things. I want to stay safe and conservative but I believe that's mainly in the tune. Also, would I need to re-tune again?
Anyways, I have every cooling mod in the book what is the smallest pulley that would be wise and efficient to run? With a 3gph meth nozzle I am not seeing 140 iat2's, not even on the dyno with less air flow.
I need more power and until I get the ported intake and the killerchiller THIS MONTH
What would be the lowest pulley I could run and still be "smart" about things. I want to stay safe and conservative but I believe that's mainly in the tune. Also, would I need to re-tune again?
lol nothing is safe with this car if the damn internals were such garbage ppl would be throwing 2.5 ont here with stock injectors since day 1
yes 2.7 is the absolute lowest
yes 2.7 is the absolute lowest
Last edited by C0baltWithM0ds; Sep 9, 2008 at 11:24 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
2.8" is the lowest you should go.
The blower becomes inefficient after that size, which means it eats more power than it makes.
I'm sure me saying this though will start an all out war however, just figured I'd be of help before the minions come in here.
The blower becomes inefficient after that size, which means it eats more power than it makes.
I'm sure me saying this though will start an all out war however, just figured I'd be of help before the minions come in here.
welp your one of the few that took all the precautions you have all cooling mods your tuned so its not like the car isnt ready for it and if u hit 280 with the 2.8 you shouldnt have a prob hittin close to 300 with a 2.6
I know the killerchiller and ported intake will really help me out this month on hitting 300whp. However, I don't want to be stupid about it. If a 2.6 or 2.7 isn't safe I am not going to use it.
inefficient and less power are 2 different things alphajaguar5. I am sure a 2.7 makes more power then a 2.8 but we could argue that if you would like lol.
inefficient and less power are 2 different things alphajaguar5. I am sure a 2.7 makes more power then a 2.8 but we could argue that if you would like lol.
2.8 is the lowest you want to go. Anything lower than a 2.8 and you will be overspinning the blower. This will also keep you most efficient with the smallest pulley. You go lower, you will start dropping efficiency a lot faster.
also, remember the smaller the pulley, the more heat.
For Reference:
2.8 will put you at max rpms at roughly 7150 engine rpms.
2.7 will put you at max rpms at roughly 6850 engine rpms.
2.6 will put you at max rpms at roughly 6600 engine rpms.
also, remember the smaller the pulley, the more heat.
For Reference:
2.8 will put you at max rpms at roughly 7150 engine rpms.
2.7 will put you at max rpms at roughly 6850 engine rpms.
2.6 will put you at max rpms at roughly 6600 engine rpms.
great thanks man, I will keep the 2.8 then and rev to 7150 roughly. Do you think on stock internals valves springs all that stuff im fine reving to 7200 redline? I have never hit redline at 7200, but tom put my redline up there. I dunno why but he said that the stock tach was a lil off or something and set it to that and said i would be fine. Thanks ralli
actually stage 2 revs to 7k redline, I would know because I had it for quite awhile. Also there is no way that the stock valves can hold to 7500-7800rpms. I had a buddy hit 7500rpms with stock internals and now has valve float.
Please don't post misinformation, it could harm noobs.
Please don't post misinformation, it could harm noobs.
2.8 is the lowest you want to go. Anything lower than a 2.8 and you will be overspinning the blower. This will also keep you most efficient with the smallest pulley. You go lower, you will start dropping efficiency a lot faster.
also, remember the smaller the pulley, the more heat.
For Reference:
2.8 will put you at max rpms at roughly 7150 engine rpms.
2.7 will put you at max rpms at roughly 6850 engine rpms.
2.6 will put you at max rpms at roughly 6600 engine rpms.
also, remember the smaller the pulley, the more heat.
For Reference:
2.8 will put you at max rpms at roughly 7150 engine rpms.
2.7 will put you at max rpms at roughly 6850 engine rpms.
2.6 will put you at max rpms at roughly 6600 engine rpms.
If I just calculate this roughly, this would result into a MAX RPM around 7000 ((7150+6850)/2)
.
Every car is differant. It's not an exact science. Not to mention how often was he hitting 7500 RPM's? How hard did he beat on his car before he upped the rev limiter? There are so many factors you have to take into consideration before you can say they can't handle something and that's just a few of them. If the motor has been whooped on or not maintained correctly then yea you take it to 7500RPM's something's gonna break.
great thanks man, I will keep the 2.8 then and rev to 7150 roughly. Do you think on stock internals valves springs all that stuff im fine reving to 7200 redline? I have never hit redline at 7200, but tom put my redline up there. I dunno why but he said that the stock tach was a lil off or something and set it to that and said i would be fine. Thanks ralli
Last edited by ralliartist; Sep 10, 2008 at 10:35 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
patooyee
Wanted - What to buy - All categories
0
Oct 1, 2015 01:07 PM



