2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Stage 2 + 2.90 Pulley

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 03:44 PM
  #51  
JKennedy1612's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-03-07
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by syP
still 42lb injectors...


like i said, i just might go back to the 2.90" im just too lazy these days.. lmao.

I stopped modding all together unfortunatley


im going to the track in october
Ha...alright cool.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 04:54 PM
  #52  
Hurt-ya's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-10-06
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by rukkee
Our stock piston's aren't gonna take much over 320 whp .
are u shitting me? stock pistons can hold way more than that.. its the boost that blows out our piston rings...
and the work was talking about the symantics of the supercharger...
but kk have fun yall.. i didnt come on this thread to get flamed...
ask cameron.. he knows all about blow'n pistons.
and i bet ur going to tell me my transmission cant hold it too huh?

Originally Posted by M-Dub
WOW I CALL BS on Hurt-ya! Our stock internals will barely hold 300-350! So NO I don't think so go somewhere else with that!

But yes JKEN it is completly possible Stangkilr is running 13.7 with nuthing but Stg.2, 2.85, and a tune! YES THAT IS IT! (albiet he is a damn good driver!)

But yeah, I would like to get out to the track myself, I just got my header, d/p, and full exhaust done so I would like to see how it goes.

But before my exhaust I dyno'd 242 whp and 213 wtq (it was 100* and 98% hummidity)

And that was just intake, S2, 2.85, tune!
i got 250whp. on a jet dyno with gmstg2 maping and other upgrades.... so dont tell me its possible. ur forgetting the 320CC METH KIT SHOT. u guys are used to the gm maping or the cobaltaddiction maping. go buy some hp tuners and **** with it...

Last edited by Hurt-ya; Sep 8, 2007 at 04:54 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 12:51 AM
  #53  
JKennedy1612's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-03-07
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by blackngold20
especially without talking internal work
No kidding
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 01:00 AM
  #54  
ARedWhiner's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 09-01-07
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: CT
so if u went lower than a 2.9 u'd need bigger injectors and a tune right?
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 03:29 AM
  #55  
Hurt-ya's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-10-06
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
lower than a 2.9 yes
colder spark plugs lower the gap
i wouldnt suggest 60 injectors... i was told it over works ur fuel pump.. u wanna stay with the 55's
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 03:50 AM
  #56  
G85Cobalt's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 09-19-06
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Cali
don't you need to do the boost bypast mod to reach max boost..or it will just bleed correct with a 2.9 pulley?????
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 04:03 AM
  #57  
JKennedy1612's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-03-07
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by Hurt-ya
lower than a 2.9 yes
colder spark plugs lower the gap
i wouldnt suggest 60 injectors... i was told it over works ur fuel pump.. u wanna stay with the 55's
Unless you get it tune correctly
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 05:00 AM
  #58  
InfinityzeN's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-02-06
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 0
From: Harker Heights, TX
Boost bypass is *BAD* *BAD* *BAD*!!! Never say those words again! All it takes is a little change with HPT to remove the boost limit. The boost bypass Quote Works Unquote by disabling an essentual safty feature of your supercharger. Don't do it. It doesn't even work about half the time for people are trying to get out of it.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 06:12 AM
  #59  
M-Dub's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-19-05
Posts: 9,704
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
I ran an intake, S2, and 2.85 on my 42's and ran just fine (with some HPTuners help)

No you don't need 60's, Area47 is running a 2.8 on 42s with meth.... so it's possible to run 2.8-" pullies without the need for larger injectors.

Get a "GOOD" tune and a meth kit and you'll be fine.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 06:52 AM
  #60  
1gmfanatik's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-26-06
Posts: 9,753
Likes: 0
From: Marlton, NJ
Keep the 42's and get it tuned. There is no need to go with larger injectors. I have a 2.79 with the 42's and a damn good tune.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 07:00 AM
  #61  
sscobaltscZ06's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 05-07-07
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Norcal east bay area
Man talk about a subject beat to death....
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 07:04 AM
  #62  
1gmfanatik's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-26-06
Posts: 9,753
Likes: 0
From: Marlton, NJ
Originally Posted by sscobaltscZ06
Man talk about a subject beat to death....
And it will never end because alot of these peoples are new to the tuning scene and all and don't have reliable resources to explain why and how certain things will work.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 07:10 AM
  #63  
sscobaltscZ06's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 05-07-07
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Norcal east bay area
Originally Posted by 1gmfanatik
And it will never end because alot of these peoples are new to the tuning scene and all and don't have reliable resources to explain why and how certain things will work.
I agree, but you dont even have to do a search on the subject here as every other thread is the same damn topic.

I'm still busting up laughing at some drunkerds comment he has 400 whp. The I saw he was from Texas...Lotta bullsh** in Texas....
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 07:13 AM
  #64  
1gmfanatik's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-26-06
Posts: 9,753
Likes: 0
From: Marlton, NJ
Originally Posted by sscobaltscZ06
I agree, but you dont even have to do a search on the subject here as every other thread is the same damn topic.

I'm still busting up laughing at some drunkerds comment he has 400 whp. The I saw he was from Texas...Lotta bullsh** in Texas....
LMAO!! Oh I know. It seems that every single newb asks the same damn questions and all the older peeps from this site have just gotten tired of telling them all to use the SEARCH button.

I would have to agree about the 400whp comments too. What kind of math are some of these peoples using? I need my local bank to learn that math.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 08:18 AM
  #65  
sscobaltscZ06's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 05-07-07
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Norcal east bay area
Originally Posted by 1gmfanatik
I would have to agree about the 400whp comments too. What kind of math are some of these peoples using? I need my local bank to learn that math.
I bet the dude thought when the dyno operator said he had 200 whp, he meant per drive wheel!
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 11:29 AM
  #66  
rnjmur's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-06-06
Posts: 2,729
Likes: 9
From: O Fallon, MO
Originally Posted by InfinityzeN
Boost bypass is *BAD* *BAD* *BAD*!!! Never say those words again! All it takes is a little change with HPT to remove the boost limit. The boost bypass Quote Works Unquote by disabling an essentual safty feature of your supercharger. Don't do it. It doesn't even work about half the time for people are trying to get out of it.
I also noticed that the stock tune bleeds boost, but with the GM stage 2 tune the boost appears not to bleed (minus TQ MGMT of course... but that can be disabled easy enough). I noticed this looking at the tunes in HPT. So if you have the GM stage 2 tune you do not need to do any kind of changes to get full boost as far as I can tell.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 12:30 PM
  #67  
JKennedy1612's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-03-07
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by rnjmur
I also noticed that the stock tune bleeds boost, but with the GM stage 2 tune the boost appears not to bleed (minus TQ MGMT of course... but that can be disabled easy enough). I noticed this looking at the tunes in HPT. So if you have the GM stage 2 tune you do not need to do any kind of changes to get full boost as far as I can tell.
Bleeds boost?
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 04:04 PM
  #68  
rnjmur's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-06-06
Posts: 2,729
Likes: 9
From: O Fallon, MO
Originally Posted by JKennedy1612
Bleeds boost?
Yeah, on the stock tune if you throw on a smaller pulley it will bleed the boost back to 12.5 psi. So essentially if you put a 3.1" pulley on a stock car you would still only get 12.5 psi, you would just hit 12.5 psi quicker in the lower RPMs. I think it bleeds at 12.5 at least, it might be 13 psi... either way you cannot got past that. Now with the stage 1 or 2 tune the supercharger does not look like it bleeds boost at all unless it detects high IAT2 temps or abuse.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 08:56 PM
  #69  
BCobaltSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Originally Posted by SmOKe JeNsOn
what i dont get is why people are paying money for the stage 2 and then buying another pulley when u could get a stage 1 and buy a pulley and save $100.


Thats what I did ....^^^^^^
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 09:01 PM
  #70  
OniMirage's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-14-05
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
From: Phx, AZ
Originally Posted by cblt12
the 2.9 is a great mod! i dont get why people debate getting it or not, but will pay 200+ for an intake that only makes more sound.


a cai intake will do more for the car than a stage kit to be honest because the car with the cai will gain power quicker and boost will come much faster than a stage 1 or 2 car. I would go as far as to say a cai would be the same as a stage2 with a 2.9
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 01:53 AM
  #71  
InfinityzeN's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-02-06
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 0
From: Harker Heights, TX
WHAT?! It's already been proven by several members at the dyno that an intake only makes a couple of whp.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 01:59 AM
  #72  
JKennedy1612's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-03-07
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by InfinityzeN
WHAT?! It's already been proven by several members at the dyno that an intake only makes a couple of whp.
Agreed lol
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 02:00 AM
  #73  
LopsidedJester's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-13-06
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by OniMirage
a cai intake will do more for the car than a stage kit to be honest because the car with the cai will gain power quicker and boost will come much faster than a stage 1 or 2 car. I would go as far as to say a cai would be the same as a stage2 with a 2.9
Is this a joke? Yeah, a CAI is like Nitrous for Boosted cars! LOL

Our stock intake is not very restricted, and already resides in the CAI spot. I agree with infinityzen i could barely feel the CAI on a stage 2, but a 2.9 was a lovely improvement.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 02:32 AM
  #74  
cblt12's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-28-05
Posts: 4,368
Likes: 0
From: Socal
Originally Posted by OniMirage
a cai intake will do more for the car than a stage kit to be honest because the car with the cai will gain power quicker and boost will come much faster than a stage 1 or 2 car. I would go as far as to say a cai would be the same as a stage2 with a 2.9
ya im sorry, but you cannot be serious. you cant feel a couple of whp... sure there is a lil better throttle response but nothing drastic.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 02:33 AM
  #75  
JKennedy1612's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-03-07
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Hey guys, I guess a 2.90" pulley and DP F*CK up the clutch because now it's slipping. I guess it can't handle that extra 15hp?
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:15 AM.