2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Thoughts on this setup. Lots.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 09:27 PM
  #1  
Billig ss/sc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 13,485
Likes: 1
From: Williamstown, NJ
Thoughts on this setup. Lots.

I won't be doing most of this 'til the spring (gotta save up some cash first), but what do you guys seriously think about this setup? Both in terms of how much power it might make and the overall "goodness" of it. All thoughts/comments welcome.

Ported Head
78lb Valve Springs
Valves

Ported M62
Ported Throttle-body

2.7" or 2.8" pulley (haven't decided yet)
60lb Injectors

H/E
Dual Pass w/ Option B

Spec Stage 2+ Clutch
Fidenza Flywheel

Tune

I currently have the Vibrant header/dp with the GMPP Performance exhaust, but I would upgrade to (probably) the Hahn 3" catback or CTI 3" catback.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 10:18 PM
  #2  
Jn2's Avatar
Jn2
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-04-07
Posts: 7,791
Likes: 3
From: Texas
3" is overkill. Stick with 2.5" all the way back. And if you go with a 2.7 u'll prob need meth.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 10:25 PM
  #3  
Billig ss/sc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 13,485
Likes: 1
From: Williamstown, NJ
Yea that's why I'm thinking I'll probably go with the 2.8" for now, I don't want to run meth right now because I don't feel like having to always watch it and fill it, I want to be able to go and not worry about it. Although it is awesome
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 10:27 PM
  #4  
twzted's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-02-06
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 0
From: Auburn Hills, MI
just go 2.7 no need to go 2.8 then say oh i want 2.7 later...it will happen

and you don't need meth for it
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 10:28 PM
  #5  
glen229's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 06-20-08
Posts: 6,173
Likes: 1
From: S. Easton, Ma
i love meth
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 10:29 PM
  #6  
Billig ss/sc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 13,485
Likes: 1
From: Williamstown, NJ
Originally Posted by twzted
just go 2.7 no need to go 2.8 then say oh i want 2.7 later...it will happen

and you don't need meth for it
Yea I was thinking with dual pass/option B and if I get ZZP's stage 3 h/e I probably would be okay with a 2.7" on there.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 10:31 PM
  #7  
glen229's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 06-20-08
Posts: 6,173
Likes: 1
From: S. Easton, Ma
Originally Posted by Billig ss/sc
Yea I was thinking with dual pass/option B and if I get ZZP's stage 3 h/e I probably would be okay with a 2.7" on there.
Ross, run the hub, youll be okay
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 10:32 PM
  #8  
Billig ss/sc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 13,485
Likes: 1
From: Williamstown, NJ
Originally Posted by glen229
Ross, run the hub, youll be okay
A little 2.7 action?
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 10:36 PM
  #9  
glen229's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 06-20-08
Posts: 6,173
Likes: 1
From: S. Easton, Ma
i did when i had the m62 still on there, no biggie, a little meth and h/e she was golden
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 10:40 PM
  #10  
mexi_loco's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 02-20-07
Posts: 8,315
Likes: 0
From: Houston
i ran 60's and a 2.7 for awhile, and I was fine. Just a h/e and i was good.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 10:40 PM
  #11  
Billig ss/sc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 13,485
Likes: 1
From: Williamstown, NJ
Originally Posted by glen229
i did when i had the m62 still on there, no biggie, a little meth and h/e she was golden
Originally Posted by mexi_loco
i ran 60's and a 2.7 for awhile, and I was fine. Just a h/e and i was good.
Good to know guys. What were your IAT2's at?

Btw, Glen, put your car back in your sig, it's one of my fav's on here.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 11:04 PM
  #12  
rico's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-09-07
Posts: 8,962
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
skip 60, go 80lbs on a 2.7 tuned on e85
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 11:11 PM
  #13  
Billig ss/sc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 13,485
Likes: 1
From: Williamstown, NJ
I would love to run E85, but NJ is lacking
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 11:13 PM
  #14  
InfraRedline's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 08-22-08
Posts: 7,177
Likes: 6
From: Alpharetta, GA
Originally Posted by rico
skip 60, go 80lbs on a 2.7 tuned on e85
I agree. Then you dont have to run meth
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 11:15 PM
  #15  
rico's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-09-07
Posts: 8,962
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by Billig ss/sc
I would love to run E85, but NJ is lacking
damn. the heb 5 mins from me got it

Originally Posted by InfraRedline
I agree. Then you dont have to run meth
yep true

Last edited by rico; Oct 5, 2009 at 11:15 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 11:15 PM
  #16  
Omnigear's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 12-15-07
Posts: 13,998
Likes: 1
From: Manama, Bahrain
Originally Posted by InfraRedline
I agree. Then you dont have to run meth
x3
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 11:53 PM
  #17  
Zach06CobaltSC's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-09-08
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Skip these things.

Valves, Ported M62, Ported Throttle-body

The stock valves are fine as is, there really isn't much of a reason to waste money on getting the supercharger ported, if you want more power from the TB area go with the ls4 throttle body. Also the 3 inch exhaust is a good idea because it will lower your boost, I also recommend the 2.8 pulley so your not over spinning the blower.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 12:11 AM
  #18  
Billig ss/sc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 13,485
Likes: 1
From: Williamstown, NJ
Thoughts on valve springs everyone?
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 12:15 AM
  #19  
cobaltssredtint's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
From: PHILADELPHIA
nice set up there ross but i do hope u r gonna get some meth later
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 12:15 AM
  #20  
Zach06CobaltSC's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-09-08
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Valve springs aren't necessarily a bad idea, but the question is whether or not they are worth it.

Some people will argue that stock valve springs are good to 7500 rpms, I personally think they are 100% stable up to 7200 rpms and that they can run up to 7400 rpm without to to much abuse being taken. So the question is whether or not a few hundred rpm's more is worth the extra money. Staying in your power band longer is a great thing, but with stock cams your not going to keep producing power all the way up to 8 grand. However the longer you are in your power band the better. All in all valve springs are great, it's just whether or not they are worth it for you.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 11:18 PM
  #21  
mexi_loco's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 02-20-07
Posts: 8,315
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by Billig ss/sc
Good to know guys. What were your IAT2's at?

Btw, Glen, put your car back in your sig, it's one of my fav's on here.
never knew what my IAT's were cause I never had a wideband. I tried to datalog with a buddie's copy of HPT, but I just couldn't get it to work. All I can give you is the numbers that ZZP has for their "stg 2 h/e", since that's what I was running.

As for valve springs, the OEM's are good. If you're thinking about porting the s/c, you should consider porting the intake manifold as well. Just make sure you know what you're doing, or take it to someone that knows what they're doing. A guy from this forum (i think it's ebristol) does pretty good job.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RaginChopsuey
War Stories
16
Oct 27, 2015 01:27 PM
biniecki
Problems/Service/Maintenance
8
Oct 25, 2015 02:23 PM
footballplaya3k
Parts
6
Sep 30, 2015 09:39 PM
anotherslowlnf
Parts
15
Sep 29, 2015 03:52 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:12 PM.