2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

True Header

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 04:33 PM
  #51  
CobaltSS313's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-03-05
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by 2K5SS/SC?
CTI's setup is a 4-1 design not a 4-2-1. Still awaiting mine as well!
then why is it considered a race header?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 04:39 PM
  #52  
CTCOBALTSSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-21-06
Posts: 7,917
Likes: 2
From: CT
Originally Posted by player_1
those are the exact reasons why I went with the JBP header:

T304 Stainless Steel Flanges
- T304 O2 Bung
- T304 O2 WideBand-Bung (optional)
- T304 O2 Bung Plug (optional)
- Electropolished Finish (optional)
- Header Wrap for #2 primary
- Computer Tuned primaries 1⅝"
- T304 14 gauge Tube construction
- 3.0" T304 Stainless Formed Collector
- Bolts straight to stock down pipe
- Includes all mounting hardware
- Includes new stainles steel bolts




Thanks Skykapp

and I got mine polished, it looks great
That's a sick looking header. Definitily top quality.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 04:47 PM
  #53  
player_1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-20-05
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
From: Brampton, Ontario
you should see the polished one, it's hot, and the tig welding job is increadable.
I'll post a pic of the one I got later.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 05:48 PM
  #54  
pierre's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 10-20-05
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Bedford MA
SkyCap

Again...Thanks.

Pierre
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 07:22 PM
  #55  
skykapp's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-13-06
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by player_1
those are the exact reasons why I went with the JBP header:

T304 Stainless Steel Flanges
- T304 O2 Bung
- T304 O2 WideBand-Bung (optional)
- T304 O2 Bung Plug (optional)
- Electropolished Finish (optional)
- Header Wrap for #2 primary
- Computer Tuned primaries 1⅝"
- T304 14 gauge Tube construction
- 3.0" T304 Stainless Formed Collector
- Bolts straight to stock down pipe
- Includes all mounting hardware
- Includes new stainles steel bolts

Thanks Skykapp

and I got mine polished, it looks great
No see I said:
16 gauge 304 stainless steel TIG welded headers with a direct to the exhaust path will always out perform snakes having sex in both HP and lifespan.

There are MothaF'ing Snakes on your MothaF'ing header -Snakes on the Plane spoof

No see this was a subtle remark about specific over-engineered designs. Hey, I’ll eat my words and be the first one to say, “Get that header!” when it makes more power than the SCdyne or GMPP manifold, but I’m confident that will never happen.
Here are a few reasons that it is not a design based on performance:
1. 1.675” Tubing @ 14 Gauge has an ID of 1.51” The exit area of the LSJ head port is larger than the exit area of a 1.51” tube. This size is more in line with the L61 not the LSJ.
2. The total bend angle of the tube exceeds 180 degrees causing excessive restriction in the flow path.
3. The radii of the bends are irregular including some less than 1D salami cuts.
4. The formed collector is too large compared to the volume of primaries causing them to just dump onto a large cavity of over 20% larger exit area. (even Corky Bell books say that)
5. Many of the primaries take very aggressive turn just outside of the exhaust port causing a massive decrease in velocity and they do the same at the collector.
6. It's expensive to build, difficult to duplicate and costs too much money.

How I see it is as follows:
Best OEM profile: GMPP manifold
Best Shorty: SCdyne (miter collector 15 dyno proven HP w/ cat)
Best Mid Length: SMS (miter collector smooth bends dyno proven power)
Best Full length : Weapon-R – but only by default (too complex & long for LSJ, but probably nice for LE5/L61)
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 07:32 PM
  #56  
Rage915's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-11-06
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
From: El Paso
Skykapp you should fab up some headers for our cars, bet it would be sick.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 07:38 PM
  #57  
Matty's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-27-06
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
From: eh
Originally Posted by Rage915
Skykapp you should fab up some headers for our cars, bet it would be sick.
Maybe he already has.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 09:45 PM
  #58  
CobaltSS313's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-03-05
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by skykapp
No see I said:
16 gauge 304 stainless steel TIG welded headers with a direct to the exhaust path will always out perform snakes having sex in both HP and lifespan.

There are MothaF'ing Snakes on your MothaF'ing header -Snakes on the Plane spoof

No see this was a subtle remark about specific over-engineered designs. Hey, I’ll eat my words and be the first one to say, “Get that header!” when it makes more power than the SCdyne or GMPP manifold, but I’m confident that will never happen.
Here are a few reasons that it is not a design based on performance:
1. 1.675” Tubing @ 14 Gauge has an ID of 1.51” The exit area of the LSJ head port is larger than the exit area of a 1.51” tube. This size is more in line with the L61 not the LSJ.
2. The total bend angle of the tube exceeds 180 degrees causing excessive restriction in the flow path.
3. The radii of the bends are irregular including some less than 1D salami cuts.
4. The formed collector is too large compared to the volume of primaries causing them to just dump onto a large cavity of over 20% larger exit area. (even Corky Bell books say that)
5. Many of the primaries take very aggressive turn just outside of the exhaust port causing a massive decrease in velocity and they do the same at the collector.
6. It's expensive to build, difficult to duplicate and costs too much money.

How I see it is as follows:
Best OEM profile: GMPP manifold
Best Shorty: SCdyne (miter collector 15 dyno proven HP w/ cat)
Best Mid Length: SMS (miter collector smooth bends dyno proven power)
Best Full length : Weapon-R – but only by default (too complex & long for LSJ, but probably nice for LE5/L61)
where do you put CTI's header in your list?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 09:46 PM
  #59  
kenhebe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-16-06
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 1
From: Lewisville, TX
My thread got hijacked
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 09:49 PM
  #60  
Matty's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-27-06
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
From: eh
Originally Posted by kenhebe
My thread got hijacked
You mean you aren't learning about headers?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 10:53 PM
  #61  
Rage915's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-11-06
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
From: El Paso
i wouldnt consider it hijacked
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 10:59 PM
  #62  
2K5SS/SC?'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-08-05
Posts: 6,200
Likes: 0
From: Niceville, FL
Not hijacked, very educational at the least.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2007 | 01:14 PM
  #63  
skykapp's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-13-06
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by CobaltSS313
where do you put CTI's header in your list?
Just -just- just 2nd to the SMS mid length. I like the overall design and the length of primaries are actually right on, but it's all for not with a formed collector. Miter cut collectors are time consuming and difficult to get right in production, but always produce more power.

Personally If I was to make a mid length header it would look a lot like this, but would have a 4-1 miter-cut merge collector of 1.75" 16 gauge tubing to a 2.5" outlet. That in turn would have a 2.5" to 3" transition of 3" long and a minimum of 4" of 3" tube before the cat face.

That's about $300 more worth of work, but also would probably result in a 20+ HP producing header.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2007 | 06:42 PM
  #64  
Ratchet104's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 01-17-06
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Suffern, New York
So who makes a 4-2-1 header?
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2007 | 03:20 PM
  #65  
CobaltSS313's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-03-05
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by skykapp
Just -just- just 2nd to the SMS mid length. I like the overall design and the length of primaries are actually right on, but it's all for not with a formed collector. Miter cut collectors are time consuming and difficult to get right in production, but always produce more power.

Personally If I was to make a mid length header it would look a lot like this, but would have a 4-1 miter-cut merge collector of 1.75" 16 gauge tubing to a 2.5" outlet. That in turn would have a 2.5" to 3" transition of 3" long and a minimum of 4" of 3" tube before the cat face.

That's about $300 more worth of work, but also would probably result in a 20+ HP producing header.
so are you saying its no good, or no??
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2007 | 03:42 PM
  #66  
Cobalt_Supercharged's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-08-05
Posts: 5,295
Likes: 0
From: AZ
I didn't see a header for the Cobalt on the SMS website. Am I missing something or are they not even an option at this point.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
goaliemo
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
6
Sep 28, 2015 01:37 PM
z28addiction
Wanted - What to buy - All categories
0
Sep 28, 2015 12:03 AM
GBRunner24
Featured Car Showcase
3
Sep 26, 2015 06:44 PM
budah93
General Cobalt
48
Sep 15, 2015 07:23 AM
hacadacalopolis
Parts
1
Sep 8, 2015 11:42 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:57 AM.