2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

True Header

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-22-2007, 04:33 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
CobaltSS313's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-03-05
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,959
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2K5SS/SC?
CTI's setup is a 4-1 design not a 4-2-1. Still awaiting mine as well!
then why is it considered a race header?
Old 01-22-2007, 04:39 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
 
CTCOBALTSSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-21-06
Location: CT
Posts: 7,917
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by player_1
those are the exact reasons why I went with the JBP header:

T304 Stainless Steel Flanges
- T304 O2 Bung
- T304 O2 WideBand-Bung (optional)
- T304 O2 Bung Plug (optional)
- Electropolished Finish (optional)
- Header Wrap for #2 primary
- Computer Tuned primaries 1⅝"
- T304 14 gauge Tube construction
- 3.0" T304 Stainless Formed Collector
- Bolts straight to stock down pipe
- Includes all mounting hardware
- Includes new stainles steel bolts




Thanks Skykapp

and I got mine polished, it looks great
That's a sick looking header. Definitily top quality.
Old 01-22-2007, 04:47 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
player_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-05
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you should see the polished one, it's hot, and the tig welding job is increadable.
I'll post a pic of the one I got later.
Old 01-22-2007, 05:48 PM
  #54  
New Member
 
pierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-20-05
Location: Bedford MA
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SkyCap

Again...Thanks.

Pierre
Old 01-22-2007, 07:22 PM
  #55  
New Member
 
skykapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-13-06
Location: California
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by player_1
those are the exact reasons why I went with the JBP header:

T304 Stainless Steel Flanges
- T304 O2 Bung
- T304 O2 WideBand-Bung (optional)
- T304 O2 Bung Plug (optional)
- Electropolished Finish (optional)
- Header Wrap for #2 primary
- Computer Tuned primaries 1⅝"
- T304 14 gauge Tube construction
- 3.0" T304 Stainless Formed Collector
- Bolts straight to stock down pipe
- Includes all mounting hardware
- Includes new stainles steel bolts

Thanks Skykapp

and I got mine polished, it looks great
No see I said:
16 gauge 304 stainless steel TIG welded headers with a direct to the exhaust path will always out perform snakes having sex in both HP and lifespan.

There are MothaF'ing Snakes on your MothaF'ing header -Snakes on the Plane spoof

No see this was a subtle remark about specific over-engineered designs. Hey, I’ll eat my words and be the first one to say, “Get that header!” when it makes more power than the SCdyne or GMPP manifold, but I’m confident that will never happen.
Here are a few reasons that it is not a design based on performance:
1. 1.675” Tubing @ 14 Gauge has an ID of 1.51” The exit area of the LSJ head port is larger than the exit area of a 1.51” tube. This size is more in line with the L61 not the LSJ.
2. The total bend angle of the tube exceeds 180 degrees causing excessive restriction in the flow path.
3. The radii of the bends are irregular including some less than 1D salami cuts.
4. The formed collector is too large compared to the volume of primaries causing them to just dump onto a large cavity of over 20% larger exit area. (even Corky Bell books say that)
5. Many of the primaries take very aggressive turn just outside of the exhaust port causing a massive decrease in velocity and they do the same at the collector.
6. It's expensive to build, difficult to duplicate and costs too much money.

How I see it is as follows:
Best OEM profile: GMPP manifold
Best Shorty: SCdyne (miter collector 15 dyno proven HP w/ cat)
Best Mid Length: SMS (miter collector smooth bends dyno proven power)
Best Full length : Weapon-R – but only by default (too complex & long for LSJ, but probably nice for LE5/L61)
Old 01-22-2007, 07:32 PM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
Rage915's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-11-06
Location: El Paso
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Skykapp you should fab up some headers for our cars, bet it would be sick.
Old 01-22-2007, 07:38 PM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
Matty's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: eh
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rage915
Skykapp you should fab up some headers for our cars, bet it would be sick.
Maybe he already has.
Old 01-22-2007, 09:45 PM
  #58  
Senior Member
 
CobaltSS313's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-03-05
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,959
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by skykapp
No see I said:
16 gauge 304 stainless steel TIG welded headers with a direct to the exhaust path will always out perform snakes having sex in both HP and lifespan.

There are MothaF'ing Snakes on your MothaF'ing header -Snakes on the Plane spoof

No see this was a subtle remark about specific over-engineered designs. Hey, I’ll eat my words and be the first one to say, “Get that header!” when it makes more power than the SCdyne or GMPP manifold, but I’m confident that will never happen.
Here are a few reasons that it is not a design based on performance:
1. 1.675” Tubing @ 14 Gauge has an ID of 1.51” The exit area of the LSJ head port is larger than the exit area of a 1.51” tube. This size is more in line with the L61 not the LSJ.
2. The total bend angle of the tube exceeds 180 degrees causing excessive restriction in the flow path.
3. The radii of the bends are irregular including some less than 1D salami cuts.
4. The formed collector is too large compared to the volume of primaries causing them to just dump onto a large cavity of over 20% larger exit area. (even Corky Bell books say that)
5. Many of the primaries take very aggressive turn just outside of the exhaust port causing a massive decrease in velocity and they do the same at the collector.
6. It's expensive to build, difficult to duplicate and costs too much money.

How I see it is as follows:
Best OEM profile: GMPP manifold
Best Shorty: SCdyne (miter collector 15 dyno proven HP w/ cat)
Best Mid Length: SMS (miter collector smooth bends dyno proven power)
Best Full length : Weapon-R – but only by default (too complex & long for LSJ, but probably nice for LE5/L61)
where do you put CTI's header in your list?
Old 01-22-2007, 09:46 PM
  #59  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
kenhebe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-06
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My thread got hijacked
Old 01-22-2007, 09:49 PM
  #60  
Senior Member
 
Matty's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: eh
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kenhebe
My thread got hijacked
You mean you aren't learning about headers?
Old 01-22-2007, 10:53 PM
  #61  
Senior Member
 
Rage915's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-11-06
Location: El Paso
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i wouldnt consider it hijacked
Old 01-22-2007, 10:59 PM
  #62  
Senior Member
 
2K5SS/SC?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-08-05
Location: Niceville, FL
Posts: 6,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not hijacked, very educational at the least.
Old 01-23-2007, 01:14 PM
  #63  
New Member
 
skykapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-13-06
Location: California
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CobaltSS313
where do you put CTI's header in your list?
Just -just- just 2nd to the SMS mid length. I like the overall design and the length of primaries are actually right on, but it's all for not with a formed collector. Miter cut collectors are time consuming and difficult to get right in production, but always produce more power.

Personally If I was to make a mid length header it would look a lot like this, but would have a 4-1 miter-cut merge collector of 1.75" 16 gauge tubing to a 2.5" outlet. That in turn would have a 2.5" to 3" transition of 3" long and a minimum of 4" of 3" tube before the cat face.

That's about $300 more worth of work, but also would probably result in a 20+ HP producing header.
Old 02-03-2007, 06:42 PM
  #64  
Member
 
Ratchet104's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-17-06
Location: Suffern, New York
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So who makes a 4-2-1 header?
Old 02-04-2007, 03:20 PM
  #65  
Senior Member
 
CobaltSS313's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-03-05
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,959
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by skykapp
Just -just- just 2nd to the SMS mid length. I like the overall design and the length of primaries are actually right on, but it's all for not with a formed collector. Miter cut collectors are time consuming and difficult to get right in production, but always produce more power.

Personally If I was to make a mid length header it would look a lot like this, but would have a 4-1 miter-cut merge collector of 1.75" 16 gauge tubing to a 2.5" outlet. That in turn would have a 2.5" to 3" transition of 3" long and a minimum of 4" of 3" tube before the cat face.

That's about $300 more worth of work, but also would probably result in a 20+ HP producing header.
so are you saying its no good, or no??
Old 02-04-2007, 03:42 PM
  #66  
Senior Member
 
Cobalt_Supercharged's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-08-05
Location: AZ
Posts: 5,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I didn't see a header for the Cobalt on the SMS website. Am I missing something or are they not even an option at this point.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
goaliemo
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
6
09-28-2015 01:37 PM
z28addiction
Wanted - What to buy - All categories
0
09-28-2015 12:03 AM
GBRunner24
Featured Car Showcase
3
09-26-2015 06:44 PM
budah93
General Cobalt
48
09-15-2015 07:23 AM
hacadacalopolis
Parts
1
09-08-2015 11:42 PM



Quick Reply: True Header



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:58 PM.