TVS 300WHP Wall
i like HP wars on FWD compact cars... its amusing
next topic, who has the faster golf cart...
ok.. continue...
(PS most arguing in these forums dont know what 300 whp is like in a cobalt.. )
next topic, who has the faster golf cart...
ok.. continue...
(PS most arguing in these forums dont know what 300 whp is like in a cobalt.. )
I wouldn't have said anything but quickly a person posted that you had 370WHP. I've seen how this goes on a forum and it creates problems that are easliy avoidable. I know you didn't mean any harm but others can get confused.
In the GP forum intense claimed 850HP once. This of course was them guessing at crank HP and had no factual basis beyond that guess. Then someone said "hey man, that's over 1000HP!" (thinking the 850 was off a chassis dyno) This then turned into intense dyno'ing over 1000HP to the wheels and people talking about it as fact. See the issue? Pretty soon we could be reading posts about 900HP Cobalts with the stock blower, LOL.
I'm currently emailing with a customer who says that his balt is 550WHP. I didn't argue with him but he's still got the M62 on this car. He even gave some dyno sheets with torque over 700 ft/lbs. I don't think he was lying, just misinformed of what is possible. I'm just trying to avoid the newbs getting confused when I ask that we keep to one HP standard for all of us posting.
shift
spin spin spin
shift
spin spin torque steer
shift
the amount of air flow required to push past the limits of the head goes up exponentially after a certain point. pushing this barrier harder will result in severe issues in the combustion chamber itself. can it be done? yes. is it wise? not really. 30psi to make 450 whp vs 22whp to make the same on a ported head. efficiency is key.
I'm not trying to start a pissing match or a war. When you post 414 HP, it's confusing and not verfifiable without knowing the parasytic loss of the transmission.
I wouldn't have said anything but quickly a person posted that you had 370WHP. I've seen how this goes on a forum and it creates problems that are easliy avoidable. I know you didn't mean any harm but others can get confused.
In the GP forum intense claimed 850HP once. This of course was them guessing at crank HP and had no factual basis beyond that guess. Then someone said "hey man, that's over 1000HP!" (thinking the 850 was off a chassis dyno) This then turned into intense dyno'ing over 1000HP to the wheels and people talking about it as fact. See the issue? Pretty soon we'll be reading posts about 900HP Cobalts with the stock blower, LOL.
I'm currently emailing with a customer who says that his balt is 550WHP. I didn't argue with him but he's still got the M62 on this car. He even gave some dyno sheets with torque over 700 ft/lbs. I don't think he was lying, just misinformed of what is possible. I'm just trying to avoid the newbs getting confused when I ask that we keep to one HP standard for all of us posting.
I wouldn't have said anything but quickly a person posted that you had 370WHP. I've seen how this goes on a forum and it creates problems that are easliy avoidable. I know you didn't mean any harm but others can get confused.
In the GP forum intense claimed 850HP once. This of course was them guessing at crank HP and had no factual basis beyond that guess. Then someone said "hey man, that's over 1000HP!" (thinking the 850 was off a chassis dyno) This then turned into intense dyno'ing over 1000HP to the wheels and people talking about it as fact. See the issue? Pretty soon we'll be reading posts about 900HP Cobalts with the stock blower, LOL.
I'm currently emailing with a customer who says that his balt is 550WHP. I didn't argue with him but he's still got the M62 on this car. He even gave some dyno sheets with torque over 700 ft/lbs. I don't think he was lying, just misinformed of what is possible. I'm just trying to avoid the newbs getting confused when I ask that we keep to one HP standard for all of us posting.

550 eh? how much bottle is involved
april 11th but i lessen the numbers cause i don't wanna over state what i have the two people bone stock before me got the same tune only dyno'd there cars also both put down around 310whp and 340wtq...... so i just took ten off of each and said that is about where i am at (don't wanna over shoot)
btw mustang dyno not dynojet
and yes it is a semi/very aggresive tune
really? i would've figured one with some decent power would love that area..... supercharger ftw?
btw mustang dyno not dynojet
and yes it is a semi/very aggresive tune
really? i would've figured one with some decent power would love that area..... supercharger ftw?
Last edited by widowedeight; Mar 26, 2009 at 02:54 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
april 11th but i lessen the numbers cause i don't wanna over state what i have the two people bone stock before me got the same tune only dyno'd there cars also both put down around 310whp and 340wtq...... so i just took ten off of each and said that is about where i am at (don't wanna over shoot)
btw mustang dyno not dynojet
and yes it is a semi/very aggresive tune
really? i would've figured one with some decent power would love that area..... supercharger ftw?
btw mustang dyno not dynojet
and yes it is a semi/very aggresive tune
really? i would've figured one with some decent power would love that area..... supercharger ftw?
Doing a quick calculation, I can see that Area is using a factor of 15% drive train loss for a Cobalt. That is obviously the stock 5 speed. That makes me a little curious as to what to expect from the Quiafe 6 speed conversion. The individual gears are a little wider, so, they will take power to run. I get that. Does the fact that the gears are far less helical in cut also effect their power consumption? Anyone care to venture a guess as to what I should be considering as a power loss factor across the 6 speed?
Doing a quick calculation, I can see that Area is using a factor of 15% drive train loss for a Cobalt. That is obviously the stock 5 speed. That makes me a little curious as to what to expect from the Quiafe 6 speed conversion. The individual gears are a little wider, so, they will take power to run. I get that. Does the fact that the gears are far less helical in cut also effect their power consumption? Anyone care to venture a guess as to what I should be considering as a power loss factor across the 6 speed?



jk bro
