tvs and e85 dyno
Thread Starter
Rent me! per hour
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
on pump it was at 72%. now it's over 100% by 6500
it does, i just need more fuel
it does, i just need more fuel
Last edited by Area47; Aug 29, 2009 at 02:02 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Senior Member
Joined: 08-04-08
Posts: 7,137
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal
its bad for the motor to floor it in 2nd on a tvs? huh
and very nice numbers area, are h/e and stu mod enough cooling mods for a tvs? also is a 3in cat-back needed i have stock cat-back with muffler, dp is 3in
and very nice numbers area, are h/e and stu mod enough cooling mods for a tvs? also is a 3in cat-back needed i have stock cat-back with muffler, dp is 3in
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: 07-02-05
Posts: 8,725
Likes: 2
From: West Carrollton (Dayton), OH
Thread Starter
Rent me! per hour
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
cruising now it sits at 1200 at 70 mph. 1250 at 80. never payed attention to it on the big end.
600whp can be had on the stock pump.
anything is possible, just depends on your budget
Nice numbers. I don't understand the specifics exactly but it sounds like you have the sensor set to gas but you're running E85? Then had it reading 11.5?
if so that's very conservative. VERY for E85
22 deg could be upped as well. Power won't fall off if you up to 25-27 deg of timing which is no problem on E85.
So really you could probably go farther on that injector setup but you're running out of pump (suprised you didn't) but you can raise voltage and meet your needs/goals.
if so that's very conservative. VERY for E85
22 deg could be upped as well. Power won't fall off if you up to 25-27 deg of timing which is no problem on E85.
So really you could probably go farther on that injector setup but you're running out of pump (suprised you didn't) but you can raise voltage and meet your needs/goals.
Member
Joined: 10-27-07
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
It does sound like there's a timing cushon there. But you would know better.
The only reason I was asking about switching over, is honestly I don't have a clue what's involved with the conversion to E85.
You're going to be living at that pump once you put new injectors in, haha.
The only reason I was asking about switching over, is honestly I don't have a clue what's involved with the conversion to E85.
You're going to be living at that pump once you put new injectors in, haha.
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: 07-02-05
Posts: 8,725
Likes: 2
From: West Carrollton (Dayton), OH
It will last less than straight pump gas. It burns quicker which leads to lower fuel economy because of the amount fo fuel needed (9.0afr is stoich). So, it is cheaper per gallon, but also less economical per mile
Thread Starter
Rent me! per hour
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
Nice numbers. I don't understand the specifics exactly but it sounds like you have the sensor set to gas but you're running E85? Then had it reading 11.5?
if so that's very conservative. VERY for E85
22 deg could be upped as well. Power won't fall off if you up to 25-27 deg of timing which is no problem on E85.
So really you could probably go farther on that injector setup but you're running out of pump (suprised you didn't) but you can raise voltage and meet your needs/goals.
if so that's very conservative. VERY for E85
22 deg could be upped as well. Power won't fall off if you up to 25-27 deg of timing which is no problem on E85.
So really you could probably go farther on that injector setup but you're running out of pump (suprised you didn't) but you can raise voltage and meet your needs/goals.
right off the street it did 347/288. i just cranked a lil more timing down low and hit 294. 6 pulls back to back and the power and torque fluctuated +/-1. so for 84k miles. my motor is more than healthy imho.
i know i can crank more timing in it. i just don't feel the need to have the car on edge anymore.
fuel side will be more than handled in the next couple weeks
Member
Joined: 10-27-07
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
lambda for either fuel is 1.00, hence why people get confused about it.
right off the street it did 347/288. i just cranked a lil more timing down low and hit 294. 6 pulls back to back and the power and torque fluctuated +/-1. so for 84k miles. my motor is more than healthy imho.
i know i can crank more timing in it. i just don't feel the need to have the car on edge anymore.
fuel side will be more than handled in the next couple weeks
right off the street it did 347/288. i just cranked a lil more timing down low and hit 294. 6 pulls back to back and the power and torque fluctuated +/-1. so for 84k miles. my motor is more than healthy imho.
i know i can crank more timing in it. i just don't feel the need to have the car on edge anymore.
fuel side will be more than handled in the next couple weeks
At least the conservative timing will allow you to be race ready more easily if you were tune swapping. I just got active on here and this is one of the more impressive builds.
I can't wait to see what this looks like with new injectors.
Last edited by BigEMU1; Aug 30, 2009 at 06:29 PM.