2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.
View Poll Results: Which would you do with my mods?
JBP Tri Flow Cams and valve springs
12
25.53%
Tag Racecraft Whipple swap
26
55.32%
Tag Racecraft 2.7 pulley with custom tune and Water/Meth Injection
9
19.15%
Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll

What would you do?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 09:52 PM
  #1  
JCswoosher2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-10-05
Posts: 3,482
Likes: 0
From: Douglasville, Georgia
What would you do?

OK i have a lot of options. I can do one of the following above. my supporting mods are in my signature. With all these group buys. i dont know which way to go. My goal is 300 whp. Tell me which would you do and why. Keep in mind i have HPtuners so that part is easy for me. This will probably be the last mod to my motor so keep in mind. no internal work done. so being safe is important also
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 09:56 PM
  #2  
Matty's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-27-06
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
From: eh
Cams.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 10:23 PM
  #3  
Scythe_Snake's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-24-06
Posts: 7,856
Likes: 21
From: Matteson, Illinois
Whipple swap!!! Major gains. And sounds sexy!
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2007 | 04:22 AM
  #4  
Cobalt_Supercharged's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-08-05
Posts: 5,295
Likes: 0
From: AZ
You want to be safe at 300whp...do the Tag 1200AX swap. You will reduce your IAT2 underful boost and will be drawing less power from the motor to turn the S/C meaning more power to the wheels. The M62 at 12psi pulls just as much if not more power than the 1200AX at 22psi. To achieve you 300whp you should only need to use 15-17 psi meaning less draw than the M62 with the stock pulley!

Plus it gives you plenty of room to improve should you want to in the future without over spinning the S/C.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 08:58 AM
  #5  
JCswoosher2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-10-05
Posts: 3,482
Likes: 0
From: Douglasville, Georgia
man. not as lopsided as i thought it would be
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 10:08 PM
  #6  
JCswoosher2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-10-05
Posts: 3,482
Likes: 0
From: Douglasville, Georgia
bump for more input
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 10:11 PM
  #7  
DTM2188's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-23-06
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
From: S. Jersey
I voted for the cams!
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 10:14 PM
  #8  
p7x's Avatar
p7x
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-15-05
Posts: 5,126
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa
Whipple man!!!, cams would be second. Think about it running something much more efficent, less work for the intercooler, lower boost, safer for compression. More hp than the other options. Only down side is $$$$
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 10:21 PM
  #9  
SilverSS/SC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-03-05
Posts: 4,272
Likes: 0
From: South Bend , Indiana
I would do the Whipple . Youll easily make your target power # and the higher efficiency of the twinscrew should be alot easier on the engine than a overspun M62 . I dont see it in your sig , so I'll make the mention ....I would pick up a water injection kit as well if u can splurge .
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 10:57 PM
  #10  
2K5SS/SC?'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-08-05
Posts: 6,200
Likes: 0
From: Niceville, FL
Lysholm 1200AX twinscrew swap from TAG FTW! I'm biased as you probably know!
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 11:05 PM
  #11  
BACK2GM's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-30-06
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: Peoria,AZ
1200ax swap !
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:31 AM.