2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Why does it take so long to rev down!?!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 06:09 PM
  #51  
Mikey851's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-27-07
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx
Originally Posted by Witt
As a small thread jack...don't be surprised if you see a company such as Hydra support us for a standalone solution. It could happen one day.
That would be nice.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 07:29 PM
  #52  
sscrazy's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-25-06
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: detroit
Originally Posted by SSsuperman
Huh???

Since when did muscle cars have high compression?
Dude most of your high hp engines are 12 to 13:1 compression. That has a huge effect on a de-rev.

Originally Posted by NJHK
What

The

Hell?

Where did you hear this crap?

I'm sorry but that made 0 sense.
Wow, do you know anything about how an engine works? Thats all I can really say to you.

Originally Posted by Onyxd04Redline
WTF?

LS1 : 10:1
LSJ : 9.5:1
ls1 is 10.5:1 But that is still not enough to make the de rev more aggressive. When I had the stock engine in my camaro I would rev it and it is a slow de-rev. My race engine that I built is 11.8:1 compression and has a decent cam derevs pretty good.

All I am saying is that it is basic engine design. That is why such the long de-rev. Simple mechanics and math.

BTW 9.5:1 is when the car is makine hp. I would bet at an idle it is in the 7.5 to 8 range.

All compressed engines are low compression.

Last edited by sscrazy; Jul 4, 2007 at 07:29 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 07:35 PM
  #53  
sscrazy's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-25-06
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: detroit
Originally Posted by Acidangel_5.0
compression and lsa does have effect on de-rev.... his statement about muscle cars is true also.. my first reaction to this post was compression and what not... however i know we run 9.5:1 so its more of a tb/electric issue for us....

no need to flame the guy b/c he is old school thinking... doesnt make him less knowledgeable.. just in a different field.. hell im still learning this new tech stuff
Thanks for the prop. But it really is not old school thinking, All engines operate on the same principle, compression, fuel and heat. It is nothing more than a glorified air pump. All that the electronics do is monitor fuel and timing and so on.

The guy that sais that it is only because of the electronics is partly right. But it has to do with both. But I would say more the "old school" lol.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 07:35 PM
  #54  
Mikey851's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-27-07
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx
Originally Posted by sscrazy
Dude most of your high hp engines are 12 to 13:1 compression. That has a huge effect on a de-rev.



Wow, do you know anything about how an engine works? Thats all I can really say to you.



ls1 is 10.5:1 But that is still not enough to make the de rev more aggressive. When I had the stock engine in my camaro I would rev it and it is a slow de-rev. My race engine that I built is 11.8:1 compression and has a decent cam derevs pretty good.

All I am saying is that it is basic engine design. That is why such the long de-rev. Simple mechanics and math.

BTW 9.5:1 is when the car is makine hp. I would bet at an idle it is in the 7.5 to 8 range.

All compressed engines are low compression.
Wow man, that's all I can say.

You really shouldn't make comments to people about not knowing something if you have NO clue. NJHK probably knows a million times more about engines than you do.

The LSJ has a 9.5:1 static compression ratio. Yes there are supercharged cars with higher compression ratios, even some over 10.5:1, it all depends on the setup and fuel being run.

Edit: Like I said, I know a higher compression engine will decel faster than a lower one, but that's not the point of this thread. No one is trying to compare our 9.5:1 engine against a 12:1 engine. They were trying to compare our 9.5:1 engine against an older 9.5:1 engine that does NOT hold the throttle plate open on decel.

If you have driven this car then you should know what we are talking about. Rev the engine up, and watch how slowly it takes it to settle down; then go get into another car with similar compression ratio and a regular spring loaded throttle plate and you will see the difference.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 08:13 PM
  #55  
JMH's Avatar
JMH
Member
 
Joined: 11-05-06
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver B.C.
Originally Posted by SS07
seriously, you rev the car up at a light to show off and you end up sounding like a douche cause it sits there whining for 30 seconds(exaggeration)
It's PHYSICS 101. Between the INERTIA of the blower and the flywheel, the engine management system has to be tuned in such a way that RPM's drop smoothly amongst the mechanicaly fused components. In other words, there's a boat anchor worth of crap hanging off this engine (for it's size) and once it's spinning fast, you can't simply "turn the switch off" without stressing the internals.
It takes a fair amount of horsepower to turn the blower as it is, conversly it would take energy to force it to stop more quickly. It's not practical or efficient to do so.
You can't have it both ways..........unless you have a turbocharger, but that's another issue.
A good metaphor for this scenario would be the way we drive: we could floor-it from every stoplight (inducing huge energy into the car), and then slam on the brakes at the next.....screeching to the line- but it's hard on the internals (you being one of them).
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 08:20 PM
  #56  
NJHK's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-05-06
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 2
From: East Brunswick, NJ
Originally Posted by MaJ
Witt/NJHK.. you guys are crazy smart. It scares me some times.
BOO! lol j/k
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 08:24 PM
  #57  
Mikey851's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-27-07
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx
Originally Posted by JMH
It's PHYSICS 101. Between the INERTIA of the blower and the flywheel, the engine management system has to be tuned in such a way that RPM's drop smoothly amongst the mechanicaly fused components. In other words, there's a boat anchor worth of crap hanging off this engine (for it's size) and once it's spinning fast, you can't simply "turn the switch off" without stressing the internals.
It takes a fair amount of horsepower to turn the blower as it is, conversly it would take energy to force it to stop more quickly. It's not practical or efficient to do so.
You can't have it both ways..........unless you have a turbocharger, but that's another issue.
Imagine tuning for a 2.0L engine that you just stuck a roots blower on from scratch lol. It would definately be a challenge, and you're right that they do have to use little tricks to make it emission friendly and maintain good driveability.

As I said in a few posts above, Mercedes does this on their cars and their diesels for emission purposes, and on the diesel so you do not hit your head on the dash .

Originally Posted by NJHK
BOO! lol j/k
NJHK doesn't know anything about engines

Last edited by Mikey851; Jul 4, 2007 at 08:24 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 08:27 PM
  #58  
Witt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-06
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by Mikey851
NJHK doesn't know anything about engines
I expect nothing less than an owl from him in reponse to that.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 08:28 PM
  #59  
JMH's Avatar
JMH
Member
 
Joined: 11-05-06
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver B.C.
Originally Posted by Mikey851
Imagine tuning for a 2.0L engine that you just stuck a roots blower on from scratch lol. It would definately be a challenge, and you're right that they do have to use little tricks to make it emission friendly and maintain good driveability.

As I said in a few posts above, Mercedes does this on their cars and their diesels for emission purposes, and on the diesel so you do not hit your head on the dash .



NJHK doesn't know anything about engines
Yeah, I read a poll the other day that stated that 4 out 5 German Mercedes owners dislike the feeling of having their heads thrown into the dash. Germans......there's always one eh?
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 08:34 PM
  #60  
NJHK's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-05-06
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 2
From: East Brunswick, NJ
Originally Posted by Mikey851
Wow man, that's all I can say.

You really shouldn't make comments to people about not knowing something if you have NO clue. NJHK probably knows a million times more about engines than you do.
mpression ratio and a regular spring loaded throttle plate and you will see the difference.
Like Seriously man...

I'm not even going to comment to sscrazy because it's not worth my time.

Originally Posted by Witt
I expect nothing less than an owl from him in reponse to that.


Originally Posted by JMH
Yeah, I read a poll the other day that stated that 4 out 5 German Mercedes owners dislike the feeling of having their heads thrown into the dash. Germans......there's always one eh?

Last edited by NJHK; Jul 4, 2007 at 08:34 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 08:36 PM
  #61  
Mikey851's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-27-07
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx
Ahahahahahaha

Edit: That is one of the funniest posts I've ever seen.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 08:39 PM
  #62  
NJHK's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-05-06
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 2
From: East Brunswick, NJ
That's exactly why I told you to refresh ROFL
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 08:41 PM
  #63  
07cobaltss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-06-06
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
From: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Originally Posted by XM15
Get a lightweight flywheel and you won't have to worry about it.
uhm not flame you, but a lighter fly wheel will make it rev quicker and longer...
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 08:47 PM
  #64  
JMH's Avatar
JMH
Member
 
Joined: 11-05-06
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver B.C.
Originally Posted by sscrazy
Dude most of your high hp engines are 12 to 13:1 compression. That has a huge effect on a de-rev.



Wow, do you know anything about how an engine works? Thats all I can really say to you.



ls1 is 10.5:1 But that is still not enough to make the de rev more aggressive. When I had the stock engine in my camaro I would rev it and it is a slow de-rev. My race engine that I built is 11.8:1 compression and has a decent cam derevs pretty good.

All I am saying is that it is basic engine design. That is why such the long de-rev. Simple mechanics and math.

BTW 9.5:1 is when the car is makine hp. I would bet at an idle it is in the 7.5 to 8 range.

All compressed engines are low compression.
" LORD TUNDERIN JESUS JEDIDIHA"! Compression changes with RPM'S!
No wonder my truck has two tanks ! Ones for REGULAR and ones for PREMIUM! HOLY SHIIIT! I guess it just eats what it needs and when it wants to? I've been abusing my baby all this time!

Originally Posted by NJHK
Like Seriously man...

I'm not even going to comment to sscrazy because it's not worth my time.








BRILLIANT!:

Last edited by JMH; Jul 4, 2007 at 08:47 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 08:50 PM
  #65  
sscrazy's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-25-06
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: detroit
Originally Posted by JMH
" LORD TUNDERIN JESUS JEDIDIHA"! Compression changes with RPM'S!
No wonder my truck has two tanks ! Ones for REGULAR and ones for PREMIUM! HOLY SHIIIT! I guess it just eats what it needs and when it wants to? I've been abusing my baby all this time!




BRILLIANT!:
lol, no it changes when you ad pressure. Man I cant believe you "smart" guys dont get it.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 08:50 PM
  #66  
NJHK's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-05-06
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 2
From: East Brunswick, NJ
Originally Posted by JMH
" LORD TUNDERIN JESUS JEDIDIHA"! Compression changes with RPM'S!
No wonder my truck has two tanks ! Ones for REGULAR and ones for PREMIUM! HOLY SHIIIT! I guess it just eats what it needs and when it wants to? I've been abusing my baby all this time!
ROFL!

I didn't even notice that!

I love it how the guy who says that compression ratio changes in different engine operations says I don't know anything about how a engine works

ROFLTACO!
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 09:36 PM
  #67  
Mikey851's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-27-07
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx
Originally Posted by sscrazy
lol, no it changes when you ad pressure. Man I cant believe you "smart" guys dont get it.
So are you saying that our static compression ratio isn't 9.5:1? What you are talking about is dynamic or boost compression or Effective compression ratio and that changes with how much boost you run. No matter the amount of boost our STATIC compression ratio is 9.5:1
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 09:37 PM
  #68  
NJHK's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-05-06
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 2
From: East Brunswick, NJ
Originally Posted by Mikey851
So are you saying that our static compression ratio isn't 9.5:1? What you are talking about is dynamic or boost compression or Effective compression ratio and that changes with how much boost you run. No matter the amount of boost our STATIC compression ratio is 9.5:1
Thank You...
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 09:52 PM
  #69  
JMH's Avatar
JMH
Member
 
Joined: 11-05-06
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver B.C.
Originally Posted by sscrazy
lol, no it changes when you ad pressure. Man I cant believe you "smart" guys dont get it.
Yes...... adding additional pressure to the cylinder bumps pressure. As a result, mean state compression ratio must fall in order to compensate unless you have accsess to grades of fuel that are not commonly available at the pump. Hence "Blown Engines" have a lower C- ratio and yet require Premium Fuel.
My issue was concerning static ratios relative to RPM. This doesn't change .....because it can't. The C-ratio is calibrated relative to the intended use of the vehicle and doesn't jump from lows to highs..........IT IS a constant.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 09:57 PM
  #70  
NJHK's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-05-06
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 2
From: East Brunswick, NJ
Originally Posted by JMH
Yes...... adding additional pressure to the cylinder bumps pressure. As a result, mean state compression ratio must fall in order to compensate unless you have accsess to grades of fuel that are not commonly available at the pump. Hence "Blown Engines" have a lower C- ratio and yet require Premium Fuel.
My issue was concerning static ratios relative to RPM. This doesn't change .....because it can't. The C-ratio is calibrated relative to the intended use of the vehicle and doesn't jump from lows to highs..........IT IS a constant.
But I mean you "smart guys" know nothing about engines...

lol
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 10:29 PM
  #71  
Cobalt_SSTuner's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-30-06
Posts: 14,899
Likes: 0
From: J-Town, Wisconsin
Originally Posted by NJHK

OMG Thats hilarious!!! +rep for you!

ok, on a serious note, (i'm probably gonna get flamed) I thought that part of the slow de-rev was caused by back pressure in the exhaust...

*flame suit on*
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 10:35 PM
  #72  
JMH's Avatar
JMH
Member
 
Joined: 11-05-06
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver B.C.
Originally Posted by NJHK
But I mean you "smart guys" know nothing about engines...

lol
They're pretty complex eh?

The most archaic, inefficient air/heat pumps around.
But they're allotta FUN!!!.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 10:36 PM
  #73  
NJHK's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-05-06
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 2
From: East Brunswick, NJ
Thanks for the rep.

Nah, backpressure shouldn't be a effect on rev down
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 10:37 PM
  #74  
Cobalt_SSTuner's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-30-06
Posts: 14,899
Likes: 0
From: J-Town, Wisconsin
yea....figured that, just a thought tho...
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 10:40 PM
  #75  
chris88z24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-07
Posts: 14,142
Likes: 71
From: NY
Computer-controlled throttle by wire <3
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:08 PM.