2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

09 2.2 has vTAK!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 02:22 PM
  #26  
REIGN SS's Avatar
Original Hayden Fanatic
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 05-06-06
Posts: 33,169
Likes: 1
From: Dayton, O HI O
Haven't we had this discussion like 50 times since the 2.4 has had it all along?!?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 02:24 PM
  #27  
Projekt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-07
Posts: 24,270
Likes: 1
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
i think so..lol
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 02:25 PM
  #28  
REIGN SS's Avatar
Original Hayden Fanatic
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 05-06-06
Posts: 33,169
Likes: 1
From: Dayton, O HI O
Try searching the 2.4 Section for VVT under Thread Titles Only
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 02:26 PM
  #29  
SS4ME's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-13-05
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
From: WI
Originally Posted by Projekt
well instead of being childish and just saying "no no no" enlighten me.
The only people being childish are the people ragging on Honda's torque like that is the desiding factor on whether a car is fast or not. That's childish and ignorant.

The internet enlightened me on how VVT and Vtec works. I'm sure it could do the same for you. Vtec is much too complex for me to explain while I'M AT WORK.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 02:26 PM
  #30  
blackbolt89's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-28-08
Posts: 5,068
Likes: 0
From: New Milford, NJ
Originally Posted by REIGN SS
Haven't we had this discussion like 50 times since the 2.4 has had it all along?!?
you're always trying to rain on our parades!
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 02:50 PM
  #31  
StreetDreamz's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 02-23-06
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
From: Mo-town, WV
Originally Posted by SS4ME
The only people being childish are the people ragging on Honda's torque like that is the desiding factor on whether a car is fast or not. That's childish and ignorant.

The internet enlightened me on how VVT and Vtec works. I'm sure it could do the same for you. Vtec is much too complex for me to explain while I'M AT WORK.
Well in a 1/4 mile scenario torque makes all the difference in the world of whether a car is fast or not. A car making 500whp and 250ft.lbs. is going to get destroyed by that same car making 400whp/400ft.lbs. Going around a track obviously is a different story, but when you start talking about VTEC being so great because it can make more "power", be careful of what kind of power you are talking about. There's one that gets you going and one that keeps you going. If you catch a car at a streetlight that has more of the first kind than you do of the second kind, it's probably going to ruin your day and cause you to come up with a typical ricer excuse or reason like power per liter, which no one gives a FLYING F*** about because you just got PWNED by a car that doesn't need VTEC to make POWER. Ever seen what happens when a Honda motor gets higher in rpm and loses oil pressure from turning too hard? You lose your precious VTEC and the power you need to win the race, thus the reason most cars at the track don't use it. This great technology can't keep up if the oil pressure drops. I'll stick with the way camshafts have been working for 100 years now thanks.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 02:57 PM
  #32  
SedanMan08's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-10-08
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, Missouri
Originally Posted by StreetDreamz
Well in a 1/4 mile scenario torque makes all the difference in the world of whether a car is fast or not. A car making 500whp and 250ft.lbs. is going to get destroyed by that same car making 400whp/400ft.lbs. Going around a track obviously is a different story, but when you start talking about VTEC being so great because it can make more "power", be careful of what kind of power you are talking about. There's one that gets you going and one that keeps you going. If you catch a car at a streetlight that has more of the first kind than you do of the second kind, it's probably going to ruin your day and cause you to come up with a typical ricer excuse or reason like power per liter, which no one gives a FLYING F*** about because you just got PWNED by a car that doesn't need VTEC to make POWER. Ever seen what happens when a Honda motor gets higher in rpm and loses oil pressure from turning too hard? You lose your precious VTEC and the power you need to win the race, thus the reason most cars at the track don't use it. This great technology can't keep up if the oil pressure drops. I'll stick with the way camshafts have been working for 100 years now thanks.
Burn^^. That is what i call Enlightenment.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 03:12 PM
  #33  
bsbllscnd970's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-20-08
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
From: Norman, OK
Originally Posted by StreetDreamz
Well in a 1/4 mile scenario torque makes all the difference in the world of whether a car is fast or not. A car making 500whp and 250ft.lbs. is going to get destroyed by that same car making 400whp/400ft.lbs. Going around a track obviously is a different story, but when you start talking about VTEC being so great because it can make more "power", be careful of what kind of power you are talking about. There's one that gets you going and one that keeps you going. If you catch a car at a streetlight that has more of the first kind than you do of the second kind, it's probably going to ruin your day and cause you to come up with a typical ricer excuse or reason like power per liter, which no one gives a FLYING F*** about because you just got PWNED by a car that doesn't need VTEC to make POWER. Ever seen what happens when a Honda motor gets higher in rpm and loses oil pressure from turning too hard? You lose your precious VTEC and the power you need to win the race, thus the reason most cars at the track don't use it. This great technology can't keep up if the oil pressure drops. I'll stick with the way camshafts have been working for 100 years now thanks.
pwned, lol
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 03:13 PM
  #34  
boltedbalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-17-08
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
/thread game over everything he just said is true.....
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 03:17 PM
  #35  
Projekt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-07
Posts: 24,270
Likes: 1
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Originally Posted by SedanMan08
Burn^^. That is what i call Enlightenment.
indeed!!!
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 03:19 PM
  #36  
ilovecars's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 06-08-08
Posts: 6,663
Likes: 1
From: Hanover, Maryland
pretty much traded 5 torque for 5 hp.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 03:23 PM
  #37  
Pavement Pusher's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 10-16-08
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: In a House
Originally Posted by StreetDreamz
Well in a 1/4 mile scenario torque makes all the difference in the world of whether a car is fast or not. A car making 500whp and 250ft.lbs. is going to get destroyed by that same car making 400whp/400ft.lbs. Going around a track obviously is a different story, but when you start talking about VTEC being so great because it can make more "power", be careful of what kind of power you are talking about. There's one that gets you going and one that keeps you going. If you catch a car at a streetlight that has more of the first kind than you do of the second kind, it's probably going to ruin your day and cause you to come up with a typical ricer excuse or reason like power per liter, which no one gives a FLYING F*** about because you just got PWNED by a car that doesn't need VTEC to make POWER. Ever seen what happens when a Honda motor gets higher in rpm and loses oil pressure from turning too hard? You lose your precious VTEC and the power you need to win the race, thus the reason most cars at the track don't use it. This great technology can't keep up if the oil pressure drops. I'll stick with the way camshafts have been working for 100 years now thanks.
any idiot can drive a car in a straight line...honda doesnt make straight line cars...



and u guys say 150hp and 90tq like were in the mid 90s still...hondas k20a makes 220hp and 161tq out of a 2.0 while chevys le5 with "superior" vvt makes 171hp and 167tq with a 2.4...

try comparing similar technology before u talk ****
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 03:23 PM
  #38  
YelloEye's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 36
From: WA
Wrong section, its an LAP not an L61.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 03:56 PM
  #39  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
Originally Posted by SS4ME
You don't have to be a fan to realize how nicely engineered Honda products are.
my motorcycle does ride pretty good
other then that...i dont have to

Originally Posted by YelloEye
Wrong section, its an LAP not an L61.
good call

Last edited by NWAE Cobalt; Apr 20, 2009 at 03:56 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 04:00 PM
  #40  
Pavement Pusher's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 10-16-08
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: In a House
Originally Posted by NWAE Cobalt
my motorcycle does ride pretty good
other then that...i dont have to
thats cuz ur not moving anything...why would u need so much trq to move something that weighs nothing...honda built there engines for there vehicles...not to swap in a heavy ass impala or something like that....300tq in a 1900lb car makes no sense...
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 04:06 PM
  #41  
shawn672's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-07-07
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by YelloEye
Wrong section, its an LAP not an L61.
09 2.2 is indeed a lap?
i thought only the XFE's were lap's.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 04:10 PM
  #42  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
Originally Posted by Pavement Pusher
thats cuz ur not moving anything...why would u need so much trq to move something that weighs nothing...honda built there engines for there vehicles...not to swap in a heavy ass impala or something like that....300tq in a 1900lb car makes no sense...
lawl, i know haha
my bike has a 1L honda engine, its a 95 cbr1000f (hurricane) and weighs about 600-700lbs
if i had a car with it..i would sell it
my gf gave me so much crap when i bought a HONDA motorcycle
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 04:19 PM
  #43  
Pavement Pusher's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 10-16-08
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: In a House
^lol im a honda fan boi and still ride yamaha
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 05:07 PM
  #44  
SS4ME's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-13-05
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
From: WI
Originally Posted by Pavement Pusher
any idiot can drive a car in a straight line...honda doesnt make straight line cars...



and u guys say 150hp and 90tq like were in the mid 90s still...hondas k20a makes 220hp and 161tq out of a 2.0 while chevys le5 with "superior" vvt makes 171hp and 167tq with a 2.4...

try comparing similar technology before u talk ****
No point in arguing. There is a lot of ignorance going on here. I guess a F1 car that makes about 750hp and 250tq is a bad reference for these guys. Torque is needed no doubt but high torgue in a car that doesn't weigh much is good for roasting tires. Oh and going up hills without switching gears.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 05:54 PM
  #45  
Jaemon52's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-22-07
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by SS4ME
No point in arguing. There is a lot of ignorance going on here. I guess a F1 car that makes about 750hp and 250tq is a bad reference for these guys. Torque is needed no doubt but high torgue in a car that doesn't weigh much is good for roasting tires. Oh and going up hills without switching gears.
A production honda block bears no resemblance...

Then does that mean I could compare a 2.2l cobalt engine to the redbull drag 2.2 that makes 1400hp?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 06:07 PM
  #46  
Witt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-06
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by StreetDreamz
Correct, VVT is superior in that the power from varying the cams is ALWAYS there, not just a sudden ON switch.





It is not, please research how VVT works.
You should research into how vtec used since 2001 works.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 06:20 PM
  #47  
06_ion2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-12-06
Posts: 2,904
Likes: 2
From: minnesota
what is vtec?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 06:31 PM
  #48  
ssyellow's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-20-09
Posts: 4,319
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by 06_ion2
what is vtec?
Magic
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 06:34 PM
  #49  
06_ion2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-12-06
Posts: 2,904
Likes: 2
From: minnesota
Originally Posted by ssyellow
Magic
i heard it was like bad sex?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 06:37 PM
  #50  
Pavement Pusher's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 10-16-08
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: In a House
Originally Posted by Witt
You should research into how vtec used since 2001 works.
thank u...basing how something from the mid to late 90s works against something from now is being ignorant...i-vtec pwn's all variable valve timing out...
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:10 PM.