2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

2.0 head on 2.2 block?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 12:20 PM
  #26  
BlackCobalt707's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 02-16-08
Posts: 8,405
Likes: 0
From: Fairfield, CA/Travis AFB, CA
alright
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 04:18 PM
  #27  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Spanky's Monkey
i'd reccomend a turbo grind cam. if you do a little research on the subject you'll find that the sc and turbo grinds are different when it comes to timing of course it'll work but i found that the sc grind is similar to na grinds and turbo grinds are modified to flow differently when it comes to the int. and exh. vavle timings cause they don't require exh scavaging. if you do go with the sc grind get a bov if you don't already have one.
the blower grind uses the stage 1 intake cam and the stage 2 exhaust cam profiles The turbo grind, like you said, is a completely different grind though
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 10:07 AM
  #28  
Spanky's Monkey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 09-09-06
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 1
From: Decatur, IL
now that information i did not know. it actually helps if you can get those cams specifically, but you would need cam gears to dial em in right?
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 11:07 AM
  #29  
BlackCobalt707's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 02-16-08
Posts: 8,405
Likes: 0
From: Fairfield, CA/Travis AFB, CA
so are those cams sufficient for my build?
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 11:12 AM
  #30  
Spanky's Monkey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 09-09-06
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 1
From: Decatur, IL
the blower grind would be good and you can find em at TTR
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 09:01 PM
  #31  
BlackCobalt707's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 02-16-08
Posts: 8,405
Likes: 0
From: Fairfield, CA/Travis AFB, CA
TTR? i forgot the full name
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 09:34 PM
  #32  
Spanky's Monkey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 09-09-06
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 1
From: Decatur, IL
turbo tech racing
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 11:45 AM
  #33  
BlackCobalt707's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 02-16-08
Posts: 8,405
Likes: 0
From: Fairfield, CA/Travis AFB, CA
i dunno, he PMed me back when i asked him about the 2.0 head tho
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2009 | 07:10 AM
  #34  
constantproject's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-04-08
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
From: dayton
subscribed...would like know mores aboot this as well
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2009 | 10:45 AM
  #35  
El Mariachi's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-31-08
Posts: 2,531
Likes: 0
From: Hesperia, California
Originally Posted by BlackCobalt707
sweet. wat are the positives/negatives from doin the swap?
My thoughts exactly, why?
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2009 | 02:46 PM
  #36  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
there really arent any benefits. the LSJ head BARELY flows more than the L61 head, and the valvetrain is the exact same excluding the valves.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
ineedacobaltss
Parts
16
Nov 7, 2015 02:25 PM
HEATON
Parts
12
Oct 16, 2015 07:21 PM
Dylan Johnson
Suspension
9
Sep 30, 2015 08:57 AM
Jesse
Problems/Service/Maintenance
2
Sep 28, 2015 12:51 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:45 AM.