The 2.2 is moving on up!!!
The 2.2 is moving on up!!!
The 2.2 is finally almost done now to go along with my other mods i have sitting at the house waitin to be installed is the 2.4 intake manifold swap, fogs for my ss/sc bumper, ss/sc springs, and the ss/sc manifold and downpipe i hope that my setup will be nice when i finally get done with up and then really beat those ricers badhttp://www.crateenginedepot.com/stor...P1817C137.aspx
http://www.crateenginedepot.com/stor...P1196C137.aspx
which one?
Last edited by wdsoccer; Aug 13, 2007 at 11:24 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
The install is easy so how long did it take you to do ?it and can you notice the power change? Does it make your intake louder?
take it off, put on adapter plate, bolt back on
I was thinking the same there. he should see some gains just because they are better parts. plus I am sure he got them pretty well discounted from other members.
the gain the manifold gives you is great if you're just shooting for dyno #s. Only problem is it seems to kill your tq #s. Personally I wouldn't do it unless you plan on f/i or raising your rpm limit to take advantage of it. From the dynos I've seen it'll increase your max hp but I'd bet there's not much, if any gain in acceleration. I wanna see some time slips.
Guys, I just got my car off the dyno and I retract my statements about the 2.4 manifold. I know others have gotten decent gains, but my power only increased in the last 700 rpms or so. It gave me 9 peak whp, but decimated my torque curve from 3500 all the way to 5500 rpms. I guess that tells you how accurate my "seat of the pants dyno" was.
I think this manifold is a little too big for the 2.2; I even lost 5 peak lb-ft of torque. I'll be going back to the old manifold tomorrow morning.
Last edited by XM15; Aug 14, 2007 at 04:34 PM.
Yup. Anyone want a 2.4 intake manifold? 
Seriously though, I wouldn't dump this one on anyone. However, if they are going turbo it wouldn't be bad for them. I might save it for down the road anyways. I'll just consider it as a $250 lesson and let it be.
Seriously though, I wouldn't dump this one on anyone. However, if they are going turbo it wouldn't be bad for them. I might save it for down the road anyways. I'll just consider it as a $250 lesson and let it be.
I agree totally Nova. I was just suprised at how much it hurt me down low. The CED dyno runs as well as some of the other member's runs did not show that. I figured on a little tq loss, but not that much and not for such a huge range.
The power band not only shifted, but never got all the way up to where it was before. I lost 5 peak lb-ft of torque and it came 700 rpms later than before. I had lower torque for a period of 2000 rpms ; there goes all my acceleration.
The power band not only shifted, but never got all the way up to where it was before. I lost 5 peak lb-ft of torque and it came 700 rpms later than before. I had lower torque for a period of 2000 rpms ; there goes all my acceleration.
Last edited by XM15; Aug 14, 2007 at 04:43 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
I hear ya' Dallas. What I really want is tuning: The fuel delay thing has got to go; with it off, we should be able to get almost 1000 extra rpms of full torque. I would take that over bad low end torque and a few extra ponies at the very top.
x2, most definitely. A good tune would work wonders, especially after adding bigger injectors. The thing that pisses me off most right now is my governor kicking in at 105.


