2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

2007 2.2 L61 Revisions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2006, 05:12 PM
  #26  
I'm old school
 
Halfcent's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-16-05
Location: Nashville
Posts: 6,905
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by WopOnTour
Visually maybe but in general COP> CSI
WOT
I agree, but I have to say, it was just plain ugly. Somebody please make a custom wiring harness for that thing that looks better please.
Old 08-22-2006, 06:50 PM
  #27  
Premium Member
Thread Starter
 
WopOnTour's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-04-05
Location: No where man
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by HackAbuse
If they even crack the E37 ECM before they crack the E16, I will ******* strangle someone
Unfortunately I think you will likely be strangling somebody...
The E16 is an "orphan" used only in the 2.2 Cobalts and IONs
The E37 is "new" but will likely be used on more than one product. Currently it's used not only on the L61 Cobalts but also on the new 2007 GMT900 pickup trucks as well (with certain engines)
All you can do is maybe start a 2.2 E16 thread on the HP Tuner forum and start getting people from here (and maybe on SaturnFans.com??) to start saying "What about us??"

Good Luck
Wop
Old 08-23-2006, 10:24 AM
  #28  
Former Vendor
 
Hahn RaceCraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-07-06
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great info, everyone, thanks!

That looks just like the 2.4 VVT coil-on-plug system, which of course is a tad different than the LSJ COP setup, if only in aesthetics. But beauty is in the eye of the beholder...I like the excellent accessibility this arrangement offers as compared to the previous L61 or even the LSJ.

And that old L61 dual-shared-coil ignition arrangement was really long in tooth, as it dates back to the Quad 4/TwinCam approach. Although, I can offer this about it...on our wicked Sunfire, we have fired 28 PSI of boost with it, so it's pretty capable!

I'm optimistic that the coil-on-plug setup will be at least as good, likely better. In every other application, they rock!
Old 08-23-2006, 12:52 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
joeworkstoohard's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-21-06
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 5,578
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Halfcent

The new E37 ECM. 32-bit processing, there ya go.

crap, does that mean that it's not "vista ready"?
Old 11-20-2006, 09:03 PM
  #30  
New Member
 
RacerX83's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-07-06
Location: NC
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by unkillsam
Any word on the effect this will have on fuel efficiency, I would imagine that it would have to go up.


I just bought my 2007 SS/ NA in the begining of October thinking it would be better on fuel then my 2000 V6 Cougar was, but honestly, this thing is just as bad if not worse on fuel economy than my Cougar was. My estimated fuel range says i can usually go around 360 +/- a few miles on a full tank, but its more like between 200 and 250 miles on a full tank.
Maybe i bought a messed up SS or something, lol, its a gas hog for a 2.4L.

-J
Old 11-21-2006, 04:15 AM
  #31  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
HunterKiller89's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-20-06
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
well whats your MPG meter on the DIC say?
i gotta lose the fuel economy award...with the way i drive, my 2.2 is getting 17.7mpg last time i checked the DIC...
i like to floor it
Old 11-27-2006, 08:15 AM
  #32  
New Member
 
brentil's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-21-05
Location: FL
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RacerX83
I just bought my 2007 SS/ NA in the begining of October thinking it would be better on fuel then my 2000 V6 Cougar was, but honestly, this thing is just as bad if not worse on fuel economy than my Cougar was. My estimated fuel range says i can usually go around 360 +/- a few miles on a full tank, but its more like between 200 and 250 miles on a full tank.
Maybe i bought a messed up SS or something, lol, its a gas hog for a 2.4L.

-J
Well it really depends on how you drive it too. If you rag on it like a dog it's going to give you fuel economy like a dog. Probably time to analyze your shifting and driving habits, because if you're getting bad fuel economy from a i4 and there are no other real apparent issues from the car then it's usually driving habits.
Old 11-27-2006, 09:58 AM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
The_Blur's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-28-06
Location: Lawrence, KS (from STL)
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HackAbuse
If they even crack the E37 ECM before they crack the E16, I will ******* strangle someone
So will I. A lot of us hate waiting.
Old 11-27-2006, 10:10 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Jackalope's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-12-06
Location: here
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Looks like the 2.2 now has the same coil set up as the 2.4 does. And your right its UGLY as hell! I hate it!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DarrenGC
2.2L L61 Performance Tech
18
12-24-2021 01:55 PM
agentirons
Electronics, Audio, and Video
2
10-16-2015 02:11 AM
ThoR294
Wanted - What to buy - All categories
4
10-04-2015 08:44 PM
Jesse
Problems/Service/Maintenance
2
09-28-2015 12:51 PM
GBRunner24
Featured Car Showcase
3
09-26-2015 06:44 PM



Quick Reply: 2007 2.2 L61 Revisions



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:35 PM.