2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

Another Member to Buy a 2.2L Turbo Kit!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-25-2007, 06:38 PM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
TCarter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-16-06
Location: Sterling, IL
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another Member to Buy a 2.2L Turbo Kit!

I am not going to mention names, and I dont even know if this user is a member, and I dont know if he even wants you all to know if he is...

But a customer just purchased a 2.2L Alpine Turbo Kit from TNT Autosport!

Hopefuly you will all see some posts regarding his outcome which might persuade you all to buy in on one!

Oh, heres a link to the kit: http://www.tntautosport.com/store/in...roducts_id=125

Last edited by TCarter; 03-25-2007 at 06:38 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 03-25-2007, 10:11 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
rickyw's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-01-06
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 1,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice bump for the 2.2 and 2.4 guys
Old 03-25-2007, 10:12 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
shortyhend2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-23-06
Location: Waynesville, Ohio
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i wouldnt get it til sct or hptuners comes out
Old 03-25-2007, 10:12 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
RollOver360's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-30-06
Location: Exit 29, NY
Posts: 3,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did u ever find out if the turbo kit will work on a 2.2 if it has the Secondary Air Injection? I remember u were gona check it out, but u never got back to me. As far as i can remember.

later
Old 03-26-2007, 12:44 AM
  #5  
I'm old school
 
Halfcent's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-16-05
Location: Nashville
Posts: 6,905
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I don't know the answer for certain, but it will work. You will get a CEL from it, but the engine will work just fine. All of the system parts would be removed by the installation of the kit. But the program in the ECM would remain, and would throw the code when it sees its not there anymore.
Old 03-26-2007, 09:53 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
LewiSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-17-06
Location: Denver Metro
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Halfcent
I don't know the answer for certain, but it will work. You will get a CEL from it, but the engine will work just fine. All of the system parts would be removed by the installation of the kit. But the program in the ECM would remain, and would throw the code when it sees its not there anymore.
It would be interesting to know what it monitors to throw that code. Alpine may be able to clamp the signal that would generate the code to fool the computer to keep the light off.
Old 03-26-2007, 02:29 PM
  #7  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
TCarter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-16-06
Location: Sterling, IL
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ive got to place the order whenever the guys check clears, when I do I will ask about the Auto trannys, and about the SAI.
Old 03-26-2007, 09:34 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
RollOver360's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-30-06
Location: Exit 29, NY
Posts: 3,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Halfcent and TCarter. Hopefully they can reflash the comp or something so the cell isnt there. I hate cells and its a pain when u have to get ur car inspected. Plus getting rid of that SAI will save some weight. I was lookin at it the other day and theres a bunch of crap all hooked into it. Thinkin about unhookin it(If i can figure out how) and see how it runs. Maybe I should wait until I get the oil in the dex-cool checked out first...

later
Old 03-26-2007, 09:35 PM
  #9  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
TCarter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-16-06
Location: Sterling, IL
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmm...ive never seen a SAI system in person...the womans balt is a 05 LS...so that does me no good.
Old 03-26-2007, 10:08 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
RollOver360's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-30-06
Location: Exit 29, NY
Posts: 3,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TCarter
hmm...ive never seen a SAI system in person...the womans balt is a 05 LS...so that does me no good.
I will see about getting some pix asap.... seeing as how the car is in the garage.... bb in 5

later

Here are the pix of the SAI... kind of sucky pix but the best I could do in a pinch..


more pix here in my gallery!
https://www.cobaltss.net/gallery/bro...p?do=favorites

or here
https://www.cobaltss.net/gallery/index.php

later

Last edited by RollOver360; 03-26-2007 at 10:08 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 03-26-2007, 10:11 PM
  #11  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
TCarter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-16-06
Location: Sterling, IL
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hopefully at the CED meet im going to will have a couple of guys with it...then I can get in there and look and see if its possible to remove it without hurting anything.
Old 03-26-2007, 10:47 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
8cd03gro's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-09-06
Location: .
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"On a 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt 2.2L Manual, 100% Stock Engine/Drivetrain, 100% Stock Exhaust, gained a overwhelming 212WHP, and 224WTQ over the stock 123whp, and 135wtq..."

i find that extemely hard to beleive. Is that just worded wrong? Were the final numbers 212whp and 224wtq....i believe that. I don't beleive you gained that. Maybe you should reword your site because right now you are techincally saying you put down 335whp and 359wtq....
Old 03-26-2007, 11:11 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Moza13-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-18-06
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 8cd03gro
"On a 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt 2.2L Manual, 100% Stock Engine/Drivetrain, 100% Stock Exhaust, gained a overwhelming 212WHP, and 224WTQ over the stock 123whp, and 135wtq..."

i find that extemely hard to beleive. Is that just worded wrong? Were the final numbers 212whp and 224wtq....i believe that. I don't beleive you gained that. Maybe you should reword your site because right now you are techincally saying you put down 335whp and 359wtq....
are you seriously that retarded that you cant understand hes saying it is now 212 instead of 123. Its called common sense. Sry for the flame but really you dont gotta nit pick on every little thing
Old 03-26-2007, 11:22 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
8cd03gro's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-09-06
Location: .
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Moza13-
are you seriously that retarded that you cant understand hes saying it is now 212 instead of 123. Its called common sense. Sry for the flame but really you dont gotta nit pick on every little thing
i gotta nit pick when some idiot like yourself doesn't realize that in advertising, you have to be very precise or people will come to false conclusions. Read my post again, realize it is pointing out an error so he can correct it, and also realize that if you actually knew how to read, that statement MEANS that they GAINED, as it says, those power numbers, when in fact those were the resulting power numbers. If I didn't nit pick on stuff like this, someone would see that (this is if they can actually read) and if they did not attend these forums or have a decent amount of knowledge on the setup, they would think they are going to put down 335whp and according to the source that would be correct, then tnt would be caught in a **** storm of smack talking about their company when the guy starts telling everyone he gained 100whp less than advertised. I worded it the way i did to not try to call them out as if they were lying or just start a **** storm. If i had said, " you don't really gain that much, those are the final numbers idiot blah blah blah" it probably would have caused problems and would have been very rude. Don't call me retarded because i am correcting mistakes that could cause problems...
Old 03-27-2007, 09:09 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
zomghax's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-02-05
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Moza13-
are you seriously that retarded that you cant understand hes saying it is now 212 instead of 123. Its called common sense. Sry for the flame but really you dont gotta nit pick on every little thing
I also read that as being the gain and not the new total, and would like some clarification. Guess I'm retarded, too?
Old 03-27-2007, 01:21 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
CleanNFun's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-03-05
Location: SoCal
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I read it fine : /. Although I kind of just assumed those were the numbers too without even reading into it. Its pretty common numbers I guess for a turbo kit, they looked normal to me but I'm just a lonely reader .
Old 03-27-2007, 01:47 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
IonNinja's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: AZ
Posts: 7,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
8cd what the hell are you talking about?
Old 03-27-2007, 02:04 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Witt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-03-06
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LewiSS
It would be interesting to know what it monitors to throw that code. Alpine may be able to clamp the signal that would generate the code to fool the computer to keep the light off.
The PCM runs a series of DTCs that actually have to pass as to not throw an SES light so it wouldn't be as simple as a voltage clamp.
Originally Posted by TCarter
hopefully at the CED meet im going to will have a couple of guys with it...then I can get in there and look and see if its possible to remove it without hurting anything.
It won't hurt anything to remove it, its simply there to reduce cold start pollution.
Originally Posted by 8cd03gro
i gotta nit pick when some idiot like yourself doesn't realize that in advertising, you have to be very precise or people will come to false conclusions. Read my post again, realize it is pointing out an error so he can correct it, and also realize that if you actually knew how to read, that statement MEANS that they GAINED, as it says, those power numbers, when in fact those were the resulting power numbers. If I didn't nit pick on stuff like this, someone would see that (this is if they can actually read) and if they did not attend these forums or have a decent amount of knowledge on the setup, they would think they are going to put down 335whp and according to the source that would be correct, then tnt would be caught in a **** storm of smack talking about their company when the guy starts telling everyone he gained 100whp less than advertised. I worded it the way i did to not try to call them out as if they were lying or just start a **** storm. If i had said, " you don't really gain that much, those are the final numbers idiot blah blah blah" it probably would have caused problems and would have been very rude. Don't call me retarded because i am correcting mistakes that could cause problems...
I'm sure common sense would prevail.
Old 03-27-2007, 08:36 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
8cd03gro's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-09-06
Location: .
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IonNinja
8cd what the hell are you talking about?
read my friend. read.
Old 03-27-2007, 09:45 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
IonFeright's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-24-07
Location: Santa Clarita, Ca
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice catch. Im sure there are some people out there that would think it means what it says.
Old 03-27-2007, 10:52 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
8cd03gro's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-09-06
Location: .
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yea, but apparently only retarded people can read english these days.
Old 03-27-2007, 10:54 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
BlackSS05's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-09-05
Location: Eastern LI NY
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
will this kit work on a 2.2 05 cavalier???
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Spanky's Monkey
Parts
37
03-07-2016 06:06 PM
dennis69
Appearance
9
10-20-2015 04:49 PM
Josh@ottp
Supporting Vendor Deals & Group Purchases
0
09-17-2015 12:03 PM
Josh@ottp
Supporting Vendor Deals & Group Purchases
0
09-08-2015 10:18 AM



Quick Reply: Another Member to Buy a 2.2L Turbo Kit!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:03 AM.