2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

Another Member to Buy a 2.2L Turbo Kit!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 25, 2007 | 06:38 PM
  #1  
TCarter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 04-16-06
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
From: Sterling, IL
Another Member to Buy a 2.2L Turbo Kit!

I am not going to mention names, and I dont even know if this user is a member, and I dont know if he even wants you all to know if he is...

But a customer just purchased a 2.2L Alpine Turbo Kit from TNT Autosport!

Hopefuly you will all see some posts regarding his outcome which might persuade you all to buy in on one!

Oh, heres a link to the kit: http://www.tntautosport.com/store/in...roducts_id=125

Last edited by TCarter; Mar 25, 2007 at 06:38 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2007 | 10:11 PM
  #2  
rickyw's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-01-06
Posts: 1,626
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh NC
nice bump for the 2.2 and 2.4 guys
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2007 | 10:12 PM
  #3  
shortyhend2004's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-23-06
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
From: Waynesville, Ohio
i wouldnt get it til sct or hptuners comes out
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2007 | 10:12 PM
  #4  
RollOver360's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-30-06
Posts: 3,014
Likes: 0
From: Exit 29, NY
Did u ever find out if the turbo kit will work on a 2.2 if it has the Secondary Air Injection? I remember u were gona check it out, but u never got back to me. As far as i can remember.

later
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 12:44 AM
  #5  
Halfcent's Avatar
I'm old school
 
Joined: 02-16-05
Posts: 6,905
Likes: 3
From: Nashville
I don't know the answer for certain, but it will work. You will get a CEL from it, but the engine will work just fine. All of the system parts would be removed by the installation of the kit. But the program in the ECM would remain, and would throw the code when it sees its not there anymore.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 09:53 AM
  #6  
LewiSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-17-06
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
From: Denver Metro
Originally Posted by Halfcent
I don't know the answer for certain, but it will work. You will get a CEL from it, but the engine will work just fine. All of the system parts would be removed by the installation of the kit. But the program in the ECM would remain, and would throw the code when it sees its not there anymore.
It would be interesting to know what it monitors to throw that code. Alpine may be able to clamp the signal that would generate the code to fool the computer to keep the light off.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 02:29 PM
  #7  
TCarter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 04-16-06
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
From: Sterling, IL
ive got to place the order whenever the guys check clears, when I do I will ask about the Auto trannys, and about the SAI.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 09:34 PM
  #8  
RollOver360's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-30-06
Posts: 3,014
Likes: 0
From: Exit 29, NY
Thanks Halfcent and TCarter. Hopefully they can reflash the comp or something so the cell isnt there. I hate cells and its a pain when u have to get ur car inspected. Plus getting rid of that SAI will save some weight. I was lookin at it the other day and theres a bunch of crap all hooked into it. Thinkin about unhookin it(If i can figure out how) and see how it runs. Maybe I should wait until I get the oil in the dex-cool checked out first...

later
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 09:35 PM
  #9  
TCarter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 04-16-06
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
From: Sterling, IL
hmm...ive never seen a SAI system in person...the womans balt is a 05 LS...so that does me no good.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 10:08 PM
  #10  
RollOver360's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-30-06
Posts: 3,014
Likes: 0
From: Exit 29, NY
Originally Posted by TCarter
hmm...ive never seen a SAI system in person...the womans balt is a 05 LS...so that does me no good.
I will see about getting some pix asap.... seeing as how the car is in the garage.... bb in 5

later

Here are the pix of the SAI... kind of sucky pix but the best I could do in a pinch..


more pix here in my gallery!
https://www.cobaltss.net/gallery/bro...p?do=favorites

or here
https://www.cobaltss.net/gallery/index.php

later

Last edited by RollOver360; Mar 26, 2007 at 10:08 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 10:11 PM
  #11  
TCarter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 04-16-06
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
From: Sterling, IL
hopefully at the CED meet im going to will have a couple of guys with it...then I can get in there and look and see if its possible to remove it without hurting anything.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 10:47 PM
  #12  
8cd03gro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-09-06
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
From: .
"On a 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt 2.2L Manual, 100% Stock Engine/Drivetrain, 100% Stock Exhaust, gained a overwhelming 212WHP, and 224WTQ over the stock 123whp, and 135wtq..."

i find that extemely hard to beleive. Is that just worded wrong? Were the final numbers 212whp and 224wtq....i believe that. I don't beleive you gained that. Maybe you should reword your site because right now you are techincally saying you put down 335whp and 359wtq....
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 11:11 PM
  #13  
Moza13-'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-18-06
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 1
From: Wisconsin
Originally Posted by 8cd03gro
"On a 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt 2.2L Manual, 100% Stock Engine/Drivetrain, 100% Stock Exhaust, gained a overwhelming 212WHP, and 224WTQ over the stock 123whp, and 135wtq..."

i find that extemely hard to beleive. Is that just worded wrong? Were the final numbers 212whp and 224wtq....i believe that. I don't beleive you gained that. Maybe you should reword your site because right now you are techincally saying you put down 335whp and 359wtq....
are you seriously that retarded that you cant understand hes saying it is now 212 instead of 123. Its called common sense. Sry for the flame but really you dont gotta nit pick on every little thing
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 11:22 PM
  #14  
8cd03gro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-09-06
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
From: .
Originally Posted by Moza13-
are you seriously that retarded that you cant understand hes saying it is now 212 instead of 123. Its called common sense. Sry for the flame but really you dont gotta nit pick on every little thing
i gotta nit pick when some idiot like yourself doesn't realize that in advertising, you have to be very precise or people will come to false conclusions. Read my post again, realize it is pointing out an error so he can correct it, and also realize that if you actually knew how to read, that statement MEANS that they GAINED, as it says, those power numbers, when in fact those were the resulting power numbers. If I didn't nit pick on stuff like this, someone would see that (this is if they can actually read) and if they did not attend these forums or have a decent amount of knowledge on the setup, they would think they are going to put down 335whp and according to the source that would be correct, then tnt would be caught in a **** storm of smack talking about their company when the guy starts telling everyone he gained 100whp less than advertised. I worded it the way i did to not try to call them out as if they were lying or just start a **** storm. If i had said, " you don't really gain that much, those are the final numbers idiot blah blah blah" it probably would have caused problems and would have been very rude. Don't call me retarded because i am correcting mistakes that could cause problems...
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 09:09 AM
  #15  
zomghax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-05
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, MB
Originally Posted by Moza13-
are you seriously that retarded that you cant understand hes saying it is now 212 instead of 123. Its called common sense. Sry for the flame but really you dont gotta nit pick on every little thing
I also read that as being the gain and not the new total, and would like some clarification. Guess I'm retarded, too?
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 01:21 PM
  #16  
CleanNFun's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-03-05
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
I read it fine : /. Although I kind of just assumed those were the numbers too without even reading into it. Its pretty common numbers I guess for a turbo kit, they looked normal to me but I'm just a lonely reader .
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 01:47 PM
  #17  
IonNinja's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-29-05
Posts: 7,915
Likes: 0
From: AZ
8cd what the hell are you talking about?
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 02:04 PM
  #18  
Witt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-06
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by LewiSS
It would be interesting to know what it monitors to throw that code. Alpine may be able to clamp the signal that would generate the code to fool the computer to keep the light off.
The PCM runs a series of DTCs that actually have to pass as to not throw an SES light so it wouldn't be as simple as a voltage clamp.
Originally Posted by TCarter
hopefully at the CED meet im going to will have a couple of guys with it...then I can get in there and look and see if its possible to remove it without hurting anything.
It won't hurt anything to remove it, its simply there to reduce cold start pollution.
Originally Posted by 8cd03gro
i gotta nit pick when some idiot like yourself doesn't realize that in advertising, you have to be very precise or people will come to false conclusions. Read my post again, realize it is pointing out an error so he can correct it, and also realize that if you actually knew how to read, that statement MEANS that they GAINED, as it says, those power numbers, when in fact those were the resulting power numbers. If I didn't nit pick on stuff like this, someone would see that (this is if they can actually read) and if they did not attend these forums or have a decent amount of knowledge on the setup, they would think they are going to put down 335whp and according to the source that would be correct, then tnt would be caught in a **** storm of smack talking about their company when the guy starts telling everyone he gained 100whp less than advertised. I worded it the way i did to not try to call them out as if they were lying or just start a **** storm. If i had said, " you don't really gain that much, those are the final numbers idiot blah blah blah" it probably would have caused problems and would have been very rude. Don't call me retarded because i am correcting mistakes that could cause problems...
I'm sure common sense would prevail.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 08:36 PM
  #19  
8cd03gro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-09-06
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
From: .
Originally Posted by IonNinja
8cd what the hell are you talking about?
read my friend. read.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 09:45 PM
  #20  
IonFeright's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-24-07
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 0
From: Santa Clarita, Ca
Nice catch. Im sure there are some people out there that would think it means what it says.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 10:52 PM
  #21  
8cd03gro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-09-06
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
From: .
yea, but apparently only retarded people can read english these days.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 10:54 PM
  #22  
BlackSS05's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-09-05
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 0
From: Eastern LI NY
will this kit work on a 2.2 05 cavalier???
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Spanky's Monkey
Parts
37
Mar 7, 2016 06:06 PM
dennis69
Appearance
9
Oct 20, 2015 04:49 PM
Josh@ottp
Supporting Vendor Deals & Group Purchases
0
Sep 17, 2015 12:03 PM
Josh@ottp
Supporting Vendor Deals & Group Purchases
0
Sep 8, 2015 10:18 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 PM.