2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

Best way to build power without forced induction

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 14, 2011 | 03:44 PM
  #26  
08baltls's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-01-11
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 1
From: Joshua, TX
Ok so let's say I do go with a forced induction setup, which is easier to install setup properly and maintain, t/c or s/c?
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2011 | 03:54 PM
  #27  
riceburner's Avatar
Super Moderator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: 05-18-11
Posts: 39,564
Likes: 87
From: West Chicago, IL
CAMS, PISTONS, HEADS.... duh
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2011 | 08:48 PM
  #28  
overboostedss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-16-09
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
From: Wi
get somebodys sc takeoff. itll be easy to put together. reliable and give u the instant power that you want and be a great dd.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2011 | 09:09 PM
  #29  
Mr.N00bLaR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 05-30-07
Posts: 2,560
Likes: 0
From: WNY
Originally Posted by 08baltls
Ok so let's say I do go with a forced induction setup, which is easier to install setup properly and maintain, t/c or s/c?
I haven't done either but I have read a bit about both..dunno if there is really an answer for that. If you want more than ~+20-30hp at the wheels over stock, you need forced induction. It's not going to happen otherwise, people have tried, then given up, then supercharged / trubocharged or sold the car. Click on the link in my signature to see what its going to take to build these setups (forced induction setups).
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2011 | 09:26 PM
  #30  
jboogie's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 06-22-09
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 1
From: western NC
add cylinders.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2011 | 12:28 AM
  #31  
nhanson's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-07-08
Posts: 6,417
Likes: 2
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by 08baltls
Ok so let's say I do go with a forced induction setup, which is easier to install setup properly and maintain, t/c or s/c?
their both pretty easy

Big power = easier on a turbo

Cheaper power = lots of used parts for S/C set up
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2011 | 06:49 PM
  #32  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
in........
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2011 | 09:53 PM
  #33  
soundjunky's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 05-26-09
Posts: 13,656
Likes: 47
From: Calgary, Alberta
let me se if I understand you;

Originally Posted by 08baltls
... I'm looking for the best way to build a little more power without doing a turbo/sc buuld up.
was my small correction legit - or are you planning on eventually going boosted?

Originally Posted by 08baltls
... I was thinking about a full header back exhaust, a 2.4 intake mani and tb, cams, and a tune. ...
If I was correct;
Odds are you will be pleasantly surprised what this will do for you (especially if you're a 5 speed);
the trend on this forum is to scoff at people who intend on staying naturally aspirated... which I think is lame-sauce.

you might want to look up this guy -> NWAE-Cobalt

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OOXCPXQcRw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E36pk5r3bCs

hmm... well it looks like he recently sold his Cobalt... which is really too bad;
he seemed to be the only member here legitimately interested in building a naturally aspirated Cobalt...
in any effect, I am sure he could chime in on what you can expect from building your car...

good luck!

Last edited by soundjunky; Nov 16, 2011 at 10:09 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 03:25 PM
  #34  
08baltls's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-01-11
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 1
From: Joshua, TX
Jesus, those stage 2 cams sound sexy!! What's the deal woth putting them on 08+ models with the.cam sensor? How mucg harder is it to put them in?
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 03:45 PM
  #35  
soundjunky's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 05-26-09
Posts: 13,656
Likes: 47
From: Calgary, Alberta
opening the engine does take time/patience and some skill... but it's doable.

I actually was happy to have found him here, because I'm pretty sure he was the only cammed 2.2;
this is another car I had before I bought my Cobalt ~ and is now relegated to occasional driver/cruiser.

Grand Am Quad4 HO w/226 cams #2 - YouTube

note a similar modification done between to two...
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 03:46 PM
  #36  
roadrage06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-29-07
Posts: 3,807
Likes: 0
From: "Central", PA
Honestly your goals vs. your desires are unrealistic.

If I understand you correctly, you don't wish to get too crazy with this, which is exactly what you would have to do to get your car to pick up 40-50hp N/A.

Based solely on your desire to still be streetable and safe, what you're going to want to do is let the car breathe: Intake, Intake manifold, longest headers/downpipe you can find, and exhaust. And then get the car tuned out of it's stock cookie-cutter tune state.

Those are the only mods I can think of that run no risk to your internals, net you a modest amount, and maintain your N/A status. With that, you could possibly see 20-30hp, putting you around 150-160whp, 160hp - 170hp at the crank.

Also, as someone else said, if you want a fun, noticeable change in your car that is safe, change the suspension.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 04:00 PM
  #37  
Phil424's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-16-11
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: New York City
There is no replacement for displacement.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 04:03 PM
  #38  
08baltls's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-01-11
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 1
From: Joshua, TX
I'm not sure how an extra 30 hp is unrealistic? With as highly touted as these ecotec motors are for their performance abilities I feel I may have made a wrong choice in vehicle platforms. Considering I've seen numerous hondas, nissans, abd toyotas all easily pulling an extra 30 horsepower from n/a motors I'm beginning to think these cobalts aren't all they're cracked up yo be.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 04:11 PM
  #39  
roadrage06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-29-07
Posts: 3,807
Likes: 0
From: "Central", PA
Originally Posted by 08baltls
I'm not sure how an extra 30 hp is unrealistic? With as highly touted as these ecotec motors are for their performance abilities I feel I may have made a wrong choice in vehicle platforms. Considering I've seen numerous hondas, nissans, abd toyotas all easily pulling an extra 30 horsepower from n/a motors I'm beginning to think these cobalts aren't all they're cracked up yo be.
Re-read my post. I said I think you could get 30 horsepower out of it. Not too terribly hard. What you had said was you wanted 175 or so (paraphrasing). I can promise you, even though your window sticker says 145hp, you don't have it at the wheels. So, you are talking about gaining more horsepower than I think you realize.

It's just been my experience most are disappointed when they get to the dyno. The numbers aren't ever what you think they are. The true test is your netted horsepower vs. your ET at the track.

Ex. - 260hp in an Ariel Atom is an entirely different animal than 260hp in a cobalt.

All depends on the platform and a realistic comprehension of WHP vs. HP made at the crank. Also comprehending how much horsepower you've gained -- 30hp is a lot more than you think, you'll definitely feel it.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 04:24 PM
  #40  
08_Slowbalt's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 09-14-10
Posts: 207
Likes: 3
From: Raleigh NC
Build the head!
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 04:33 PM
  #41  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
Ive got an 08 speed L61. its got 2.4 intake manifold, GMPP SRI, ZZP LT header, Hahn catback, very slightly tuned to just disable PE delay, zero fuel, maf or timing tuning done. I flow just over 19lbs across the MAF, this translates roughly to 185-190 crank hp. My car has SS suspension and some aftermarket bits, and is a hoot to drive. 30hp isnt unreasonable, but it is about all youre gonna get without cams and compression boost.

Compare to the NA Hondas Nissans and Toyotas you mentioned....not a single one of the similar cars can pull on my car. A fully bolted 2.2 will beat a tC, Si, Sentra, etc.....dont get stuck on the numbers, NA ecos are fun to drive.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 04:59 PM
  #42  
08baltls's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-01-11
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 1
From: Joshua, TX
Ok guys, this is not the first time I've worked on building cars. Its just the first time I've built something that wasnt a carbuerated small block or a rotary. Sure its easier to build power on those style motors, but it cant be that much more difficult on these cars.

I mean with a 2.4 intake mani, full 2.25" exhaust, full cold air intake, stage 2 cams, and a tune, I dont see why I wont be building any more power on the motor. I have no idea where something is missing but obviously something is.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 05:14 PM
  #43  
Cobaltpunk's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 09-19-10
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Louisville
hey. Ive got the 2.4 Intake and TB, as well as ZZP long tube headers and catless downpipe. It makes the car sound great.. Im not so sure about noticeable power increases though :/ GOOD LUCK!
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 05:36 PM
  #44  
nhanson's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-07-08
Posts: 6,417
Likes: 2
From: Minnesota
i wish i had 5 speed to bang gears.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 06:13 PM
  #45  
MadBrad's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-29-07
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Best way to build power without forced induction. Power can be a measure of work input and output as heat. So if you take some gasoline and pour into you engine bay. Now lets add a little bit more work by supplying a little bit of enthropy into the system by means of a match. Now we are talking about bulding some serious potenial power here. Next take the match and light it. Drop it into the engine bay and push the car down the street. The more gasoline you pour the more power you will get.

Dang it that is still forcing it to happen. ???

All kidding aside. N/A is fun, but the aftermaket to stay N/A for our cars is exspensive. Not much support. Yes you can build off the ecotec but each generation of ecotec from the cavy to the cobalt have it's own issues you must get around. Like my 07, stronger block but becasue of the TPS on the cam it takes a bit of maching modifactions too make aftermarket cams fit.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 06:44 PM
  #46  
soundjunky's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 05-26-09
Posts: 13,656
Likes: 47
From: Calgary, Alberta
Originally Posted by Phil424
There is no replacement for displacement.
sheesh...

if that were true, what are you doing driving a compact chevy with a four cylinder??



Originally Posted by 08baltls
Ok guys, this is not the first time I've worked on building cars. Its just the first time I've built something that wasnt a carbuerated small block or a rotary. Sure its easier to build power on those style motors, but it cant be that much more difficult on these cars.

I mean with a 2.4 intake mani, full 2.25" exhaust, full cold air intake, stage 2 cams, and a tune, I dont see why I wont be building any more power on the motor. I have no idea where something is missing but obviously something is.
as you've started to notice, there are very few people on this forum who will support you - most will scoff and say that it cannot be done.
the guy I mentioned earlier was making more power, and iirc some of his posts correctly he said he was smoking 2.4L cars - those are rated 171hp...
but even he seemed to be hitting a brick wall at much past 170-180hp... which I find down right perplexing;
that red car I linked a vid for earlier honestly makes about 200whp;
similar cars/setups as mine have been dyno proven at 200+whp ~ but that's the engine that GM discontinued - replacing it with the ecotec...
It all really comes down to what you're expecting or wanting in your car;
IMHO the BEST Cobalt to do old school type hot-rodding to, is the 2008 and prior L61...


...and for those who doubt my red cars power level - here's a couple year old video that my brother took of me spanking a mouthy SS/2.4L owner;
(and I've done a couple upgrades since that video was taken too!)

July 17 2009 run #3 - YouTube

HINT: quad4forums.com
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 07:46 PM
  #47  
Mr.N00bLaR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 05-30-07
Posts: 2,560
Likes: 0
From: WNY
This is probably the most up to date dyno list on this forum of 2.2L owners.:
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/dyno...2011-a-247552/


If you look around you can probably find some before and after cases since that is mostly a list of the afters. Maybe its just because of the small world I live in but...who brags about NA power on ecos? It's probably because I troll here 100% of the time but, that's not why you buy an eco powered car.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 08:00 PM
  #48  
soundjunky's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 05-26-09
Posts: 13,656
Likes: 47
From: Calgary, Alberta
hmm... look who's at number 1!?

Guess I had a good recommendation as to who the OP should talk to huh?



(but I never saw that thread - thanks for linking it!)
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 10:38 PM
  #49  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
Originally Posted by 08baltls
Ok guys, this is not the first time I've worked on building cars. Its just the first time I've built something that wasnt a carbuerated small block or a rotary. Sure its easier to build power on those style motors, but it cant be that much more difficult on these cars.

I mean with a 2.4 intake mani, full 2.25" exhaust, full cold air intake, stage 2 cams, and a tune, I dont see why I wont be building any more power on the motor. I have no idea where something is missing but obviously something is.
Well with the setup you just mentioned you should expect about 170 at the wheels with proper tune. The 2.25" exhaust would actually be a restriction at that point.
Also the 2.4L intake manifold while better than stock is still actually a restriction to making max power on a 2.2 Very few guys know this, even fewer beleive it, but theres a few (particularly Euro) guys whom have seen it on the dyno.

Also since your used to SBC's you should use some perspective here,output on a very well built and tuned medium-high compression city drivable small block is somewhere around 1.5hp per cubic inch( 525hp for a 350) Use that same metric on your L61 and you come up with 180hp, minus 10% for the trans losses and you get 162whp.

Last edited by Maven; Nov 17, 2011 at 10:52 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 10:47 PM
  #50  
LS2SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-19-10
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
From: DFW TX(corinth)
bore it out!! bore it out!! bore it out!!
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:12 PM.