2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

Car And Driver Review of LS Sedan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 08:14 PM
  #1  
MachiBLue's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-20-05
Posts: 3,402
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Car And Driver Review of LS Sedan

Have any of you guys read the latest issue of Car And Driver?? They have a 4 page article on a '05 Cobalt LS Sedan. It has the sport package, MP3 player, and the upgraded 7 speaker Pioneer sound system. As tested price was $18,245. Well thats a little background info, heres the good part...
C/D Test Results
Accerlation
0-30 MPH.....3.0 Seconds
0-40 MPh.....4.3 Seconds
0-50 MPH.....6.2 Seconds
0-60 MPH.....8.4 Seconds
0-70 MPH.....11.1 Seconds
0-80 MPH.....14.7 Seconds
0-90 MPH.....19.8 Seconds
0-100 MPH.....25.8 Seconds
0-110 MPH.....34.7 Seconds
Street Start, 5-60 MPH.....8.4 Seconds
Top-gear acceleration, 30-50 MPH.....4.0 Seconds
50-70 MPH.....5.3 Seconds
Standing 1/4 mile.....16.6 Seconds@ 84 MPH
Top speed(drag limited).....124 MPH
Braking
70-0 MPH.....188ft
Handling......77g
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 09:48 PM
  #2  
wesmanw02's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-13-04
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Sweet - Those are some really nice numbers for a LS Sedan auto. It definitely one of the quickest cars in its class, especially if you get the coupe with the 5-speed manual.

Pretty weird though how the 0-60 time and the 5-60 time were the same. Usually the street start results in a significantly slower time, sometimes as much as a 1/2 second

Hopefully C&D will test a Cobalt Coupe 5-speed soon - if the auto can do that well, the manual version should be even better
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 10:40 PM
  #3  
Eddie's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-11-04
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
From: patterson, ca
thats sweet i was looking for that on the website but couldnt find it.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 11:24 PM
  #4  
b-spot's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-15-04
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB
0.77g's??

Yikes... I hope the LS comes with shitty tires or something, because that absolutely sucks.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 11:33 PM
  #5  
CoolCobalt_NY's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 01-13-05
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Rockland, NY
Perrelies or something like that!
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 07:25 AM
  #6  
rm25x's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 02-19-05
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: Grand Blanc Michigan
This weekend I will throw the GTech pro in mine and pull some numbers since its finally going to be above freezing. I am sure I can pull at least .85g in the skid pad. And I am on stock 195's lol.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 10:44 AM
  #7  
avro206's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-17-04
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
From: Calgary Alberta Canada
0.77 isn't terrible considering the fact the LS does not have any kind of sport suspension.
The S/C SS shows what the suspension is capablke withsome tweaking.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 02:45 PM
  #8  
tiny's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-16-05
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
the ls has better suspension than the base

ill be takin mine to the track once to run it for some numbers
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2005 | 08:42 PM
  #9  
avro206's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-17-04
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
From: Calgary Alberta Canada
Originally Posted by tiny
the ls has better suspension than the base

ill be takin mine to the track once to run it for some numbers
prove it---I see nothing to says it does. Only thing I did see was "Suspension: Premium Ride" on base and LS.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The Rookie24
War Stories
14
Sep 14, 2015 07:03 PM
royce777
Complete Cars
11
Sep 14, 2015 12:17 PM
Getaway_Driver
Problems/Service/Maintenance
41
Sep 8, 2015 09:41 AM
Extremespeed
South Pacific
0
Sep 1, 2015 09:05 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:06 AM.