2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

Dyno tomorrow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-16-2007, 09:43 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
randizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-07
Location: MN
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dyno tomorrow

since I have free access to a dyno because of progam here at MSU Mankato, i'll be dynoing my car tomorrow. it's completely bone stock, just doing it for fun. ya'll can guess if you want, i don't really care what it puts down, but i'll post it up here tomorrow or the next day.
Old 10-17-2007, 09:17 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Novajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-18-06
Location: Jacksonville AL
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
138whp/132wtq
Old 10-17-2007, 09:23 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
YellowLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-24-05
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Novajoe
138whp/132wtq
Doubtful thats what I dyno'd at with a Dyno Jet.

I say 115hp/120tq

Originally Posted by randizzle
since I have free access to a dyno because of progam here at MSU Mankato, i'll be dynoing my car tomorrow. it's completely bone stock, just doing it for fun. ya'll can guess if you want, i don't really care what it puts down, but i'll post it up here tomorrow or the next day.
Let me know if you can get an accurate tach reading cause mine kept freaking out so they couldnt pull my torque

Last edited by YellowLT; 10-17-2007 at 09:23 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 10-17-2007, 03:04 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
randizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-07
Location: MN
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just got done, it was a blast! it was doing a lab assignment for my buddy so we tested the speedometer and ****. then we did the WOT test and before you question the results, keep in mind this is a Mustang dyno, so we're dealing with wheel horsepower. here's what came up with:





and to answer your question yellowlt, we just hook up the rpm reader to the wires going into the coils and it seemed to read perfectly. also, good guess, pretty damn close.
Old 10-17-2007, 03:08 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
YellowLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-24-05
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by randizzle
just got done, it was a blast! it was doing a lab assignment for my buddy so we tested the speedometer and ****. then we did the WOT test and before you question the results, keep in mind this is a Mustang dyno, so we're dealing with wheel horsepower. here's what came up with:

116.6 WHP @ 5000 rpm
125.1 WTQ @ 4000 rpm

i'll scan the sheet or take a picture in a little bit. and to answer your question yellowlt, we just hook up the rpm reader to the wires going into the coils and it seemed to read perfectly. also, good guess, pretty damn close.
Thats the same place we hooked mine too but couldnt get a good reading. Did you use all four wires?
Old 10-17-2007, 03:12 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
randizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-07
Location: MN
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no just 1
Old 10-18-2007, 10:10 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
YellowLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-24-05
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by randizzle
no just 1
You remember which one???? You have an 07?
Old 10-18-2007, 10:25 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
OrngBalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-10-07
Location: West Babylon, NY
Posts: 5,893
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
WOW... is that really what the base balt's are putting down? man that depressing...
Old 10-18-2007, 10:33 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
alleycat58's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-05
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 18,531
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by OrngBalt
WOW... is that really what the base balt's are putting down? man that depressing...
That's pretty standard. Plus a Mustang dyno gives you real-world numbers not ego numbers like a DynoJet. So 116 would be what you'd get out of it on the street. Honestly not bad for a baseline economy car. Still more than base Civics and such.
Old 10-18-2007, 11:07 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
OrngBalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-10-07
Location: West Babylon, NY
Posts: 5,893
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
lol, true.... but still depressing alley...

I mean I came from a V8, 4 barrel carb, grand prix sport.

Time to throw on some more bolt-ons and get some kick out of my baby.

I want my car to make me

Last edited by OrngBalt; 10-18-2007 at 11:54 AM.
Old 10-18-2007, 11:56 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
randizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-07
Location: MN
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by alleycat58
That's pretty standard. Plus a Mustang dyno gives you real-world numbers not ego numbers like a DynoJet. So 116 would be what you'd get out of it on the street. Honestly not bad for a baseline economy car. Still more than base Civics and such.
exactly, what do people expect out of them, these aren't built to be sports cars. the person who was helping was actually really impressed. he said i was the first 4-banger he had seen without mods to get over 100.
Old 10-18-2007, 01:35 PM
  #12  
New Member
 
07whitebalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-16-07
Location: Ohio
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats 20% loss from the 145 crank HP chevy advertises. About normal for drivetrain loss.
Old 10-18-2007, 01:41 PM
  #13  
Member
 
korax123's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-01-05
Location: Arizona City, AZ
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well a dyno jet it would prob be more like 125-130hp to the wheels.

Now put a few bolt-on's on and re-dyno to see what you get.
Old 10-18-2007, 02:29 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
OrngBalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-10-07
Location: West Babylon, NY
Posts: 5,893
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
sp at 20% loss, does that mean the SS versions are getting about 145 to the wheels? SC's about 190?

Just trying to get a feel for where we stand. Ive driven an SS nice and aggressive like and thats kinda what im going for with mine
Old 10-18-2007, 02:38 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
alleycat58's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-05
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 18,531
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by OrngBalt
sp at 20% loss, does that mean the SS versions are getting about 145 to the wheels? SC's about 190?

Just trying to get a feel for where we stand. Ive driven an SS nice and aggressive like and thats kinda what im going for with mine
2.4's get about 140 to the wheels
SS/SC's get about 200 at the wheels on a Mustang Dyno

2.0's were underrated HP wise, 2.2s and 2.4s are almost dead on.
Old 10-18-2007, 02:51 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
OrngBalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-10-07
Location: West Babylon, NY
Posts: 5,893
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
kool, thanks alley. rock on.
Old 10-18-2007, 02:54 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
alleycat58's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-05
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 18,531
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by OrngBalt
kool, thanks alley. rock on.
My estimate on the 2.4s might be slightly high on a Mustang dyno, but those numbers should be about close. The underrating of the SS/SC throws things a little our of wack, but you should see about a 20hp difference between the 2.2 and 2.4 and about a 75-80 hp difference between the 2.2 and the 2.0.
Old 10-18-2007, 03:10 PM
  #18  
New Member
 
07whitebalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-16-07
Location: Ohio
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What RPM is peak HP and What RPM is peak torque?
Old 10-18-2007, 03:28 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
OrngBalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-10-07
Location: West Babylon, NY
Posts: 5,893
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by alleycat58
My estimate on the 2.4s might be slightly high on a Mustang dyno, but those numbers should be about close. The underrating of the SS/SC throws things a little our of wack, but you should see about a 20hp difference between the 2.2 and 2.4 and about a 75-80 hp difference between the 2.2 and the 2.0.
Thanks al... im building my car for autocross right now, and my goal is to get some of the HP and TQ numbers of the SS and handling of the SC if not superior. I am on the way but not there yet
Old 10-18-2007, 03:38 PM
  #20  
New Member
 
cobalt.in.progress's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-11-07
Location: Arizona
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
great info orng, thanks for sharing
Old 10-18-2007, 03:45 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
HunterKiller89's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-20-06
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by 07whitebalt
What RPM is peak HP and What RPM is peak torque?
i'd guess 4200RPM tq and 6000RPM hp
Old 10-18-2007, 03:46 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
OrngBalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-10-07
Location: West Babylon, NY
Posts: 5,893
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by cobalt.in.progress
great info orng, thanks for sharing
I can't tell if that was serious or sarcastic
Old 10-18-2007, 03:47 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
alleycat58's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-05
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 18,531
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by OrngBalt
Thanks al... im building my car for autocross right now, and my goal is to get some of the HP and TQ numbers of the SS and handling of the SC if not superior. I am on the way but not there yet
Advice if you REALLY want to get the most out of auto-x?

Skip the power and build the suspension. If you can be competitive in a lower-powered class, you get a better PAX. Adding power bumps you classes and hurts your PAX index, so you end up hurting yourself.

My ex boyfriend would absolutely DOMINATE week in and week out. In a Civic that put exactly 67 horsepower to the ground. As an added "f-u" to the "power power power" people, he'd tape his dyno sheet to the car for all to see.

Get the car to handle where you want it to FIRST. Keep it on street tires until you learn the car. When you're maxed on street tires, buy R-compounds and do the same thing. When you're getting EVERYTHING you can out of the car, THEN go for the power.
Old 10-18-2007, 03:51 PM
  #24  
New Member
 
cobalt.in.progress's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-11-07
Location: Arizona
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by OrngBalt
I can't tell if that was serious or sarcastic
haha no that was serious.
Old 10-18-2007, 03:58 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
OrngBalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-10-07
Location: West Babylon, NY
Posts: 5,893
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by alleycat58
Advice if you REALLY want to get the most out of auto-x?

Skip the power and build the suspension. If you can be competitive in a lower-powered class, you get a better PAX. Adding power bumps you classes and hurts your PAX index, so you end up hurting yourself.

My ex boyfriend would absolutely DOMINATE week in and week out. In a Civic that put exactly 67 horsepower to the ground. As an added "f-u" to the "power power power" people, he'd tape his dyno sheet to the car for all to see.

Get the car to handle where you want it to FIRST. Keep it on street tires until you learn the car. When you're maxed on street tires, buy R-compounds and do the same thing. When you're getting EVERYTHING you can out of the car, THEN go for the power.
I've built suspension. Sway bars, springs, strut tower bar, performance tires. I am learning the car, pushing it to its limits. love the handling right now.

I love the idea of a 67hp dyno sheet taped to a car pwning people.

Originally Posted by cobalt.in.progress
haha no that was serious.
ok, i wasnt sure what info you were talking about, but no prob. lol

Last edited by OrngBalt; 10-18-2007 at 03:58 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost


Quick Reply: Dyno tomorrow



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:50 AM.