2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

Dynoed with Stage 1 Comp Cams

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 12:28 AM
  #1  
copson20's Avatar
Thread Starter
Premium Member
 
Joined: 10-27-07
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MO
Dynoed with Stage 1 Comp Cams

Well here is the number that you all have been waiting for. I thought that i would have gotten a little more but I'll take it. 33HP over stock pretty good. NEED THAT TURBO!!!

VIDEO OF DYNO RUN

VIDEO OF DYNO RUN 2


Here is dyno before Cams



AND THE DYNO AFTER CAMS!!!


Last edited by copson20; Sep 28, 2008 at 01:18 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 12:29 AM
  #2  
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: 05-04-08
Posts: 36,934
Likes: 2
From: The 405
damn thats really good
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 12:37 AM
  #3  
copson20's Avatar
Thread Starter
Premium Member
 
Joined: 10-27-07
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MO
Yeah i was really hoping for 170
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 12:43 AM
  #4  
wollis1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-01-08
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
From: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
still...very nice. pretty excellent numbers for a 2.2 NA engine. too bad for me they dont have anything really for the 2.4 yet
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 12:46 AM
  #5  
copson20's Avatar
Thread Starter
Premium Member
 
Joined: 10-27-07
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MO
Everyone at the Dyno place was pretty excited about it. But i'll take it.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 12:46 AM
  #6  
Red06LS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-06-06
Posts: 2,889
Likes: 0
From: Redding, Nor-Cal.
WoW, nicee... if i keep my car i might have to get these to keep up with my buddys SVT-F...
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 12:55 AM
  #7  
copson20's Avatar
Thread Starter
Premium Member
 
Joined: 10-27-07
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MO
I have video. but my buddy has it on this camera going to get it tomorrow
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 12:56 AM
  #8  
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: 05-04-08
Posts: 36,934
Likes: 2
From: The 405
they need some for the LSJ's haha
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 01:04 AM
  #9  
copson20's Avatar
Thread Starter
Premium Member
 
Joined: 10-27-07
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MO
Video uploading now

video up in first post

Last edited by copson20; Sep 28, 2008 at 01:04 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 01:06 AM
  #10  
Zdeuce4's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 12-16-07
Posts: 4,441
Likes: 0
From: S.A
very nice.. my buddy with a cavy with stg 2s blows the doors off of rsx-s' and anything under that range.. nice sleeper.. get stg 2's if u can..
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 01:13 AM
  #11  
copson20's Avatar
Thread Starter
Premium Member
 
Joined: 10-27-07
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MO
Na want to go turbo. Next thing/ Engine build
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 01:19 AM
  #12  
WickedSS2005's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-02-05
Posts: 8,725
Likes: 2
From: West Carrollton (Dayton), OH
Originally Posted by EXsoccer1921
they need some for the LSJ's haha
JBP and GMR have cams for our LSJ if you want to give it a crack. The problem is they don't really show much of a gain for the cost.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 01:56 AM
  #13  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
Originally Posted by wollis1
still...very nice. pretty excellent numbers for a 2.2 NA engine. too bad for me they dont have anything really for the 2.4 yet
Since when?

CAI's, cams, headers, catback, multiple tunes........

Thats damn respectable man, youve not got more power than a 2.4 Youre lookin 180-184hp at the crank easy.

Last edited by Maven; Sep 28, 2008 at 01:56 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 02:02 AM
  #14  
copson20's Avatar
Thread Starter
Premium Member
 
Joined: 10-27-07
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MO
Thats damn respectable man, youve not got more power than a 2.4 Youre lookin 180-184hp at the crank easy.
Thanks i do beat 2.4s hands down.

I have 12% Drivetrain Loss

Last edited by copson20; Sep 28, 2008 at 02:02 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 02:12 AM
  #15  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
12%, thats about the highest Ive seen, change your fluid

But that puts you just over 185hp.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 02:14 AM
  #16  
copson20's Avatar
Thread Starter
Premium Member
 
Joined: 10-27-07
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MO
Yeah i need to do that. some guys said they have 15-18% loss
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 03:14 AM
  #17  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
Originally Posted by copson20
Yeah i need to do that. some guys said they have 15-18% loss
Every F23 Ive ever seen runs between 9-12%
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 03:32 AM
  #18  
IonNinja's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-29-05
Posts: 7,915
Likes: 0
From: AZ
so you were pulling 150whp before the cams? did you dyno stock?

around ~10whp peak for those cams...not bad.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 08:52 AM
  #19  
MP Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 09-02-07
Posts: 4,523
Likes: 0
From: MP, PA (S of Pittsburgh)
If you got 33 more HP i hope the stage 2 cams do better for me like 40-45 more HP
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 10:50 AM
  #20  
copson20's Avatar
Thread Starter
Premium Member
 
Joined: 10-27-07
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MO
Originally Posted by IonNinja
so you were pulling 150whp before the cams? did you dyno stock?

around ~10whp peak for those cams...not bad.
it was 133hp

Originally Posted by MP Cobalt
If you got 33 more HP i hope the stage 2 cams do better for me like 40-45 more HP

33hp was the hosrsepower gained with all bolt on's and cams

Last edited by copson20; Sep 28, 2008 at 10:51 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 03:43 PM
  #21  
pacific cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-05-08
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, B.C.
Originally Posted by copson20
Yeah i was really hoping for 170
Yeah me too but I think the SS 2.4 is 156 WHP Stock so your 2.2 is pretty fast
Are you getting the MRZ pulley? I did and now I can get to the higher rpm's faster and 1st gear pulls really hard.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 03:55 PM
  #22  
1bdstlLSJ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-14-08
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
From: st.louis
Well lets see....If Jason were to get bigger injectors and if HPTuners had software out, that car could easily make 180whp on stage 1 cams hands down.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 05:16 PM
  #23  
o3nisoaso3's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-20-07
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
From: Irwin, Pa (S of Pittsburgh)
nice man... not too bad. that an auto or manual?

ill dyno soon. im shooting for 200whp

Originally Posted by 1bdstlLSJ
Well lets see....If Jason were to get bigger injectors and if HPTuners had software out, that car could easily make 180whp on stage 1 cams hands down.
injectors??? they dont add power buddy and hpt is nothing different than what vince can do.

Last edited by o3nisoaso3; Sep 28, 2008 at 05:17 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 05:55 PM
  #24  
copson20's Avatar
Thread Starter
Premium Member
 
Joined: 10-27-07
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MO
manual of course way more fun.

Originally Posted by pacific cobalt
Yeah me too but I think the SS 2.4 is 156 WHP Stock so your 2.2 is pretty fast
Are you getting the MRZ pulley? I did and now I can get to the higher rpm's faster and 1st gear pulls really hard.
Yeah I plan on getting the pulley. Just going to sit low for a while

Last edited by copson20; Sep 28, 2008 at 05:55 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 06:04 PM
  #25  
Spanky's Monkey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 09-09-06
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 1
From: Decatur, IL
nice, whats the gas mileage like now?
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 PM.