2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

GMPP Intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 06:42 AM
  #26  
Jackalope's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 1
From: here
Originally Posted by LewiSS
Well, you have to give the scoop SOME credit! (Actually, most of the credit, really).
Maybe not LewiSS. WHen you dynoed your car with the scoop did you get another high speed fan to point at the scoop? If not then if couldn't have gotten enough air for it to function as a true scoop all it would have done is have one more place to draw air from rather then just the restrictive factory lower box hole. So what I did was not seal it to the hood and removed the underhood blanket and its a BIG difference.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 11:39 AM
  #27  
LewiSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-17-06
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
From: Denver Metro
Originally Posted by Jackalope
Maybe not LewiSS. WHen you dynoed your car with the scoop did you get another high speed fan to point at the scoop? If not then if couldn't have gotten enough air for it to function as a true scoop all it would have done is have one more place to draw air from rather then just the restrictive factory lower box hole. So what I did was not seal it to the hood and removed the underhood blanket and its a BIG difference.
Yes, the real benefit is in NOT forcing it to breathe only through the stock fender inlet. In your case your's is breathing around the gasket (between the air box and the hood). In my case it's breathing through the hood, since I sealed mine to the hood. When I dyno'ed, we threw a plastic bag over the top and closed the hood forcing it to breathe just through the stock fender inlet. I figured that would simulate installing it with a good seal to the stock hood blanket. Then we ran it without the bag, letting it breathe properly. The same gains we got with the second run would apply to your system.

And, BTW, we DID have a fan blowing down the scoop (probably not 60 MPH worth, but enough to ensure there was some flow). The fan cooling the radiator was big enough to help air flow in the scoop.

Anyway, the key with the GMPP is to either seal it and let it breathe outside air (using a scoop or the RKSport hood) OR making sure it ISN'T sealed to the hood with nowhere to breathe except through the stock inlet.

Did you see a mileage gain? I've gone from about 24 to about 28 on my commute, but I also switched to premium so I'm not sure which did what.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 06:54 PM
  #28  
ReggaeRampage's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-07-06
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: Philly, PA
Originally Posted by jerseyfatboy

(littlt off topic) looked at ur pics bro they were great...... was jus wondering if your cobalt came with those lower grilles for the fogs. and if they didn't were they hard to put in? and also are your fogs HID? and were those hard to put in? ...thanx

Thanks boss. Yeah, the model I have (LT) came with the fog lights, so the grill around it came that way from the factory. At the time of those pictures, I had blue aftermarket LUMINICS bulbs put in. Those blew out one by one. So as of right now, I've gone back to stock bulbs.

I forgot I even had those pictures in my gallery. They need to be updated...cuz I'm currently going thru an overhaul.

Originally Posted by Jackalope
2 HP?!?!? WTF! Try about 12HP! Lewis has it on his car and has the dyno results to proove it! 2hp

Lets just say between this intake the GMPP manifold the injector swap and Steves tune the 2.0 SC guys no longer run away from me like they once did.

Heres a link to his dyno thread.https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/2-4l-le5-performance-tech-46/gmpp-intake-dyno-numbers-47695/
For a 2.2, WITHOUT a hood scoop, it's only around 2hp!
An SS (2.4L) WITH hood scoop, is about 10-14hp as LewiSS said...

Last edited by ReggaeRampage; Apr 17, 2007 at 06:54 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 07:47 PM
  #29  
Jackalope's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 1
From: here
Originally Posted by ReggaeRampage
For a 2.2, WITHOUT a hood scoop, it's only around 2hp!An SS (2.4L) WITH hood scoop, is about 10-14hp as LewiSS said...
Having my car dynoed this weekend and I'll tell you exactly what its worth with no hood scoop. All his scoop did was allow it to get more air, remove the underhood blanket and the rubber seal and it gets tons of air then too. I'll post my results asap. And I didn't realize the 2.2 and 2.4 would have different HP gains from the same mod. If it adds 10 hp to a 2.4 it should do the same to the 2.2 but I'll find out.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2007 | 12:27 AM
  #30  
Mike85220's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 04-18-07
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
From: Apache Junction, AZ
I read the description about the dyno gaining 12 horses with the scoop, but it was a measley 2 horses or less by itself.

No wonder GM Performance keeps the warrany going with this mod.

They didnt expect someone to add a hood scoop.

The only problem is the elements leaking in and causing problems.

If it rains hard, the filter will get soaked through the hood scoop and that would be bad for the engine. You could add a sliding piece that blocks the hood scoop for such a time as it raining I guess.

What about making the stock inlet bigger with some plumbing going down and making a ram air unit instead off the bottom?
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2007 | 01:17 AM
  #31  
LewiSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-17-06
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
From: Denver Metro
Originally Posted by Mike85220
I read the description about the dyno gaining 12 horses with the scoop, but it was a measley 2 horses or less by itself.

No wonder GM Performance keeps the warrany going with this mod.

They didnt expect someone to add a hood scoop.

The only problem is the elements leaking in and causing problems.

If it rains hard, the filter will get soaked through the hood scoop and that would be bad for the engine. You could add a sliding piece that blocks the hood scoop for such a time as it raining I guess.

What about making the stock inlet bigger with some plumbing going down and making a ram air unit instead off the bottom?
I get no soaking of the filter, and I've driven in some toad-stranglers (for the Yankee's, read: Nor'Easters). It's amazing, but true. I'd be more worried with a low-mounted intake. I had originally planned to add a closeable baffle, but it turned out I didn't need it.

Making the stock inlet bigger, however, might have the same effect. I wouldn't get carried away with ducting it much lower - it will still be breathing outside air that's not in the engine bay.

As for GM not expecting a scoop to be added, the only reason I can see to build that box the way they did was for just that possibility. Otherwise it would have been cheaper to have closed off the top.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2007 | 01:31 AM
  #32  
Jasper33's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 04-11-07
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Salem, OH
isnt it cheaper and just as good to go with an injen intake rather than your setup...i must admit it is a great idea tho...but i just dont trust myself cutting into my hood
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2007 | 01:54 AM
  #33  
LewiSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-17-06
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
From: Denver Metro
Originally Posted by Jasper33
isnt it cheaper and just as good to go with an injen intake rather than your setup...i must admit it is a great idea tho...but i just dont trust myself cutting into my hood
It's probably just as good, but when I saw the GMPP and thought of the possibilities, I just HAD to do it!
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2007 | 07:43 AM
  #34  
Jackalope's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 1
From: here
::::sigh:::: Guys have you ever seen the GMPP intake in person? It replaces the TB adapter, the duct work with a polished tube, and the lid with an open top adapter for the filter to sit in. Now the open top has a rubber seal around it that is supposed to mate up to, seal against the underside of the hood. When you seal it to the hood it can only draw air in from the same small duct that the factory lower box connects to so no matter what the intake is its still getting no more air then the factory set up.

LewiSS when he added his scoop opened the filter up to be able to get in as much air as the engine wants. More air = more HP, LewiSS prooved that on his dyno runs with netting 10 more HP by opening up the air filter to more air then the stock lower could.

I by removing the rubber seal and removing the underhood blanket have done the same thing, allow the filter to access to as much air as it can possibly get.

I'll do just like Lewis did when I get my dyno time except I don't have a scoop just open in the engine bay. If I'm wrong, then I'm wrong but I don't think I am.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2007 | 08:26 AM
  #35  
07cobaltowner's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-23-06
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
From: York, PA
:jackalope:
cant wait to see the numbers, gonna be interesting!
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2007 | 09:00 AM
  #36  
Jasper33's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 04-11-07
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Salem, OH
Wouldnt you think your numbers may be a little bit lower due to the higher temp of air that your getting. Colder air is denser air and that mean more power (even though theres not a real big difference)
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2007 | 10:16 AM
  #37  
LewiSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-17-06
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
From: Denver Metro
Originally Posted by Jackalope
::::sigh:::: Guys have you ever seen the GMPP intake in person? It replaces the TB adapter, the duct work with a polished tube, and the lid with an open top adapter for the filter to sit in. Now the open top has a rubber seal around it that is supposed to mate up to, seal against the underside of the hood. When you seal it to the hood it can only draw air in from the same small duct that the factory lower box connects to so no matter what the intake is its still getting no more air then the factory set up.

LewiSS when he added his scoop opened the filter up to be able to get in as much air as the engine wants. More air = more HP, LewiSS prooved that on his dyno runs with netting 10 more HP by opening up the air filter to more air then the stock lower could.

I by removing the rubber seal and removing the underhood blanket have done the same thing, allow the filter to access to as much air as it can possibly get.

I'll do just like Lewis did when I get my dyno time except I don't have a scoop just open in the engine bay. If I'm wrong, then I'm wrong but I don't think I am.
You should see the same gains as I did.

Originally Posted by Jasper33
Wouldnt you think your numbers may be a little bit lower due to the higher temp of air that your getting. Colder air is denser air and that mean more power (even though theres not a real big difference)
Since dyno runs are almost always done with the hood open, then, no, he won't see less. On the street in the summer (especially after slow traffic heat-soaking) then, yes, there might be a slight difference. I've not seen published figures for HP loss due to temp, although I know they're out there. But I understand 'lope is planning a mod to fix this.

Last edited by LewiSS; Apr 18, 2007 at 10:16 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2007 | 11:32 AM
  #38  
ReggaeRampage's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-07-06
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: Philly, PA
Originally Posted by Jackalope
Having my car dynoed this weekend and I'll tell you exactly what its worth with no hood scoop. All his scoop did was allow it to get more air, remove the underhood blanket and the rubber seal and it gets tons of air then too. I'll post my results asap. And I didn't realize the 2.2 and 2.4 would have different HP gains from the same mod. If it adds 10 hp to a 2.4 it should do the same to the 2.2 but I'll find out.
Good stuff...let us know how it works out.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 04:00 PM
  #39  
Stl06LS's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 04-07-07
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: O Fallon, MO.
Originally Posted by Stl06LS
I drove my car the same 40 mile trip before and after the intake. Before 33 mpg, after 34.5 mpg. To me that is too close to to claim a mpg benifit from the GMPP intake. Oh, before the 17" wheels I averaged 36 mpg on that trip.
I pulled the seal off the upper intake box today and drove the same 40 mile trip, 37.5 mpg this time. I need to find a way to get more fresh air to the filter.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 06:35 PM
  #40  
LewiSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-17-06
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
From: Denver Metro
Originally Posted by Stl06LS
I pulled the seal off the upper intake box today and drove the same 40 mile trip, 37.5 mpg this time. I need to find a way to get more fresh air to the filter.
Click on the link in my sig about making the GMPP intake functional and see how I did that!
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 08:31 PM
  #41  
Stl06LS's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 04-07-07
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: O Fallon, MO.
LewiSS, that's a great idea. But, I really don't want to cut a hole in the hood.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 11:43 PM
  #42  
Red07SSNA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-08-06
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 2
From: *
Originally Posted by Stl06LS
LewiSS, that's a great idea. But, I really don't want to cut a hole in the hood.
I little more expensive -- I put a SS/NA front bumper/Fascia on my LS but instead of installing fog lights the right fog light hole is now a direct 3" tube to the bottom of my GMPP filter.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 12:38 AM
  #43  
Stl06LS's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 04-07-07
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: O Fallon, MO.
Originally Posted by Cobalter LS
I little more expensive -- I put a SS/NA front bumper/Fascia on my LS but instead of installing fog lights the right fog light hole is now a direct 3" tube to the bottom of my GMPP filter.
That's more of what I'm looking to do.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
DarrenGC
2.2L L61 Performance Tech
18
Dec 24, 2021 01:55 PM
no_ss
Problems/Service/Maintenance
11
Oct 18, 2015 11:58 PM
GBRunner24
Featured Car Showcase
3
Sep 26, 2015 06:44 PM
OrangeCoba
Problems/Service/Maintenance
0
Sep 25, 2015 06:06 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:41 PM.