2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

Headers/Downpipe

Old Jan 18, 2008 | 07:50 PM
  #1  
MP Cobalt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 09-02-07
Posts: 4,523
Likes: 0
From: MP, PA (S of Pittsburgh)
Headers/Downpipe

I just installed my GMPP Performance Exhaust. I now want to get a new set of headers and downpipe. I own a 2.2L cobalt. Which is the best headers and downpipe to install on my car. i would like anyones opinion.

ok i ask nicely for peoples opinions, and all i get is nothing. Your opinions and good websites would be very great.

Last edited by MP Cobalt; Jan 18, 2008 at 07:50 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2008 | 07:59 PM
  #2  
XM15's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
From: CT
lol Easy man. The 2.2 section doesn't exactly jump with activity.


The big question is, where do you want your powerband? The type of header will determine where it is to some degree.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2008 | 08:39 PM
  #3  
YSUsteven's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-19-06
Posts: 1,381
Likes: 0
From: North Carlonia
Originally Posted by XM15
lol Easy man. The 2.2 section doesn't exactly jump with activity.


The big question is, where do you want your powerband? The type of header will determine where it is to some degree.
I want low end torque, which one would be best for that?
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2008 | 09:10 PM
  #4  
XM15's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by YSUsteven
I want low end torque, which one would be best for that?
Longtube header. I have the Vibrant setup and like it alot. I'm not sure who else offers a longtube header though.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 05:14 PM
  #5  
MP Cobalt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 09-02-07
Posts: 4,523
Likes: 0
From: MP, PA (S of Pittsburgh)
so the vibrant will give me more low end torque. Do you have both vibrant headers and a downpipe? What site did you order this off of so i can look around. Im gonna swap my intake manifold next then look for headers and a downpipe
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 05:19 PM
  #6  
ecotecon18s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-29-06
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 0
From: Mulberry, Florida
I have the CA header and Catless XTC downpipe and it def. opened up the top end more...no more lag between 80-100 like there used to be...
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 05:43 PM
  #7  
MP Cobalt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 09-02-07
Posts: 4,523
Likes: 0
From: MP, PA (S of Pittsburgh)
how much did your headers and downpipe cost ?
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 05:44 PM
  #8  
yellowltcoupe22's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-21-07
Posts: 3,741
Likes: 0
From: lucedale, ms
Originally Posted by ecotecon18s
I have the CA header and Catless XTC downpipe and it def. opened up the top end more...no more lag between 80-100 like there used to be...
runnin without a cat dont effect your the way your car runs..? i figured it would make it run like **** with out a cat.. we must not have a o2 sensor after the cat..
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 06:08 PM
  #9  
RBC's Avatar
RBC
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-25-05
Posts: 4,359
Likes: 3
From: Saginaw/Fort Worth, Texas
Don't waste your money on 2 headers, you only need one header unless you got some kind of option that the rest of us were never offered.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 06:21 PM
  #10  
ecotecon18s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-29-06
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 0
From: Mulberry, Florida
I got both the header and DP used, so they were pretty cheap. The Header was 130 shipped and the DP was 131 shipped, then the various gaskets were about 30 total. I bought the ARK CEL eliminator for the DP, and so far it has worked, but fitment for it sucked; we had to air hammer parts of the metal under the car to get it to work.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 02:50 PM
  #11  
cougar2588's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-01-07
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by ecotecon18s
I got both the header and DP used, so they were pretty cheap. The Header was 130 shipped and the DP was 131 shipped, then the various gaskets were about 30 total. I bought the ARK CEL eliminator for the DP, and so far it has worked, but fitment for it sucked; we had to air hammer parts of the metal under the car to get it to work.
i've never heard of one of those. i tried searching for it but i couldnt find it. where did u pick that up from?
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 03:09 PM
  #12  
YSUsteven's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-19-06
Posts: 1,381
Likes: 0
From: North Carlonia
Originally Posted by ecotecon18s
I have the CA header and Catless XTC downpipe and it def. opened up the top end more...no more lag between 80-100 like there used to be...
The top end was better, but what about the low end torque? (under 3000) Did you notice any improvement down low?
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 09:51 PM
  #13  
t800's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-03-06
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
This is something I have also been curious about. Which headers produce the best low to mid range power. I know mostly everything improves either the high end or low end. Whats in the middle ???
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 10:08 PM
  #14  
XM15's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by t800
This is something I have also been curious about. Which headers produce the best low to mid range power. I know mostly everything improves either the high end or low end. Whats in the middle ???
Long tube and mid length headers. Check out Vibrant and ZZP. I think Clear Image has a group buy on their header right now as well.

Originally Posted by MP Cobalt
so the vibrant will give me more low end torque. Do you have both vibrant headers and a downpipe? What site did you order this off of so i can look around. Im gonna swap my intake manifold next then look for headers and a downpipe
Personally, I would open up the exhaust first.


With regards to the Vibrant setup, because it is a longtube, it won't bolt up to the stock downpipe. They sell the header and DP together, which will bolt right up to the cat back.

Last edited by XM15; Jan 28, 2008 at 10:08 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 10:19 PM
  #15  
t800's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-03-06
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
I think I will go with the ZZP thanks guys !!
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 02:39 PM
  #16  
CARLYLE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-26-06
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: Chicago,IL
Originally Posted by XM15
Longtube header. I have the Vibrant setup and like it alot. I'm not sure who else offers a longtube header though.
hate to bust your bubble but headers especially longtubes wont give you any low end power headers are a higher rpm performance piece. and the closest you can get to low end power would be shorty headers
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 07:06 PM
  #17  
YSUsteven's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-19-06
Posts: 1,381
Likes: 0
From: North Carlonia
Originally Posted by CARLYLE
hate to bust your bubble but headers especially longtubes wont give you any low end power headers are a higher rpm performance piece. and the closest you can get to low end power would be shorty headers
So if a shorty header is better for low end torque, does that mean that the GMPP maniflod is even better than a header due to its extremely short 4 to 2 section?
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 07:12 PM
  #18  
XM15's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by CARLYLE
hate to bust your bubble but headers especially longtubes wont give you any low end power headers are a higher rpm performance piece. and the closest you can get to low end power would be shorty headers

My bubble is just fine. Here is part of a tech article from an exhaust design company:

"When considering a header design, the following points need to be considered:

1) Header primary pipe diameter (also whether constant size or stepped pipes).
2) Primary pipe overall length.
3) Collector package including the number of pipes per collector and the outlet sizing.
4) Megaphone/tailpipe package.
There are many ideas about header pipe sizing. Usually the primary pipe sizing is related to exhaust valve and port size. Header pipe length is dependent on wave tuning (or lack of it). Typically, longer pipes tune for lower r.p.m. power and the shorter pipes favor high r.p.m. power. The collector package is dependent on the number of cylinders, the engine configuration (V-8, inline 6, etc.), firing order and the basic design objectives (interference or independence). The collector outlet size is determined by primary pipe size and exhaust cam timing. "



Originally Posted by YSUsteven
So if a shorty header is better for low end torque, does that mean that the GMPP maniflod is even better than a header due to its extremely short 4 to 2 section?

Don't bother with the GMPP manifold. Get a true header.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 07:12 PM
  #19  
XM15's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by CARLYLE
hate to bust your bubble but headers especially longtubes wont give you any low end power headers are a higher rpm performance piece. and the closest you can get to low end power would be shorty headers

My bubble is just fine. Here is part of a tech article from an exhaust design company:

"When considering a header design, the following points need to be considered:

1) Header primary pipe diameter (also whether constant size or stepped pipes).
2) Primary pipe overall length.
3) Collector package including the number of pipes per collector and the outlet sizing.
4) Megaphone/tailpipe package.
There are many ideas about header pipe sizing. Usually the primary pipe sizing is related to exhaust valve and port size. Header pipe length is dependent on wave tuning (or lack of it). Typically, longer pipes tune for lower r.p.m. power and the shorter pipes favor high r.p.m. power. The collector package is dependent on the number of cylinders, the engine configuration (V-8, inline 6, etc.), firing order and the basic design objectives (interference or independence). The collector outlet size is determined by primary pipe size and exhaust cam timing. "



Originally Posted by YSUsteven
So if a shorty header is better for low end torque, does that mean that the GMPP maniflod is even better than a header due to its extremely short 4 to 2 section?

Don't bother with the GMPP manifold. Get a true header.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 08:34 PM
  #20  
hubes's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: NS, Canada
I think the vibrant would be too big for a 2.2, especially if you want low end torque, as the primaries are 1.75
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
05vue-redline-06ion
Tuning
0
May 14, 2011 02:01 PM
Melon
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
14
May 12, 2011 05:47 AM
ryank771
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
17
Jun 10, 2010 01:33 PM
laxoalie609
Parts
0
Feb 24, 2009 07:41 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:13 AM.