LS vs SS question

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Apr 13, 2009 | 08:28 PM

#26

06_ion2

Senior Member

Joined: 12-12-06

Posts: 2,904

Likes: 2

From: minnesota

Quote:

Originally Posted by D4u2s0t

Why do 16-20, when you can make the same power on 12-15 if it's done right.

well if you want that big of a turbo go for it.. i would rather have less lag possible.. but still im shooting for 400whp

Apr 13, 2009 | 08:34 PM

#27

07blackg5

Slobodan Milošević

iTrader: (8)

Joined: 11-05-07

Posts: 5,959

Likes: 215

From: Serbia

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackbolt89

keep in mind that all these "dyno" numbers CAN be innacurate. i went to a dyno day where they utilize mustang dynos and there was a guy with a TVS powered ss/sc that had a hard time breaking 290whp with stage 2 a tune and some rice tow hooks. lol.

if you took that same car to a dynojet he would be pushing like 320 "whp"

make sure you know that some people on here claim so much whp but don't clarify what type of dyno they ran on.

i ran 161/148 on a mustang dyno with my 2.2

lol useless post/info