2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

More Theory

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2008, 10:01 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tru2nrtt777's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-08-08
Location: Fayetteville/Linden, NC/Myrtle Beach, SC
Posts: 3,728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More Theory

I am looking at building a N/A 2.2 capable of about 220 crank hp, I already have a small mods list and would perfer some experienced builders advice.

So far on my list(some already done some still waiting on the paper):
Mod............................................... .Approx gain compounded
Full exhaust(high flow cat).................15hp
CAI............................................... ..10hp
JBP stage 3 cams.............................23hp

What are some things I could do to bump that up? I dont want to run 93 since around here some stations only have 91. I am hoping to(at the most) run 89. I have heard more compression but I really have no experience in that field.
Old 02-20-2008, 10:05 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
XM15's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-16-06
Location: CT
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, if you go with higher compression, you need to go with higher octane. Thats why GM recommends higher octane for the 2.4 than the 2.2.

You could probably bump the compression up another half point to 10.5:1 and run 89. The 2.4 is 10.4:1.


Also, you could build the valvetrain so you could raise the rev limit up much higher. That coupled with the appropriate cam would give you a really good boost in power.
Old 02-20-2008, 10:41 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Sw4y1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-25-06
Location: USAG Stuttgart, GER
Posts: 1,860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by XM15
Well, if you go with higher compression, you need to go with higher octane. Thats why GM recommends higher octane for the 2.4 than the 2.2.

You could probably bump the compression up another half point to 10.5:1 and run 89. The 2.4 is 10.4:1.


Also, you could build the valvetrain so you could raise the rev limit up much higher. That coupled with the appropriate cam would give you a really good boost in power.
Exactly my thoughts as well. You shouldnt have a problem running 11:1 on 91 but i see you do not want to run that. Which is kinda lame because if you want power, dont limit yourself because you dont want to buy a certain octane fuel. That should not be whats holding you back from modding.

A great addition to your list would be a lighter flywheel and neutral balance shafts. Free up some weight on the engine, it should free up a good amount of power. You may not want to go with Stage 3 cams tho because there isnt tuning tested with them yet. Start with stage 1 or 2 and test out tuning using a piggyback. See if you can use them to their fullest then if you can, sell the stage 2's and go with stage 3 if you really want, but I dont see them working right without a standalone. You could easily make 200whp NA if you could up the rev limit, stage 1 cams, higher compression, neutral shafts, lighter flywheel and a decent tune.
Old 02-20-2008, 10:49 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tru2nrtt777's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-08-08
Location: Fayetteville/Linden, NC/Myrtle Beach, SC
Posts: 3,728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No flywheel, flexplate

Once again, I wouldnt mind higher octain if I could reliably find it around this shithole.
Old 02-20-2008, 10:51 PM
  #5  
Banned
 
rossin21's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-18-08
Location: chicago
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
aem fic to tune it with
Old 02-20-2008, 10:57 PM
  #6  
Member
 
brandon2.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-16-08
Location: Kodiak, AK
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
machined head and 2.4L intake manifold,

and bored throttle body
Old 02-21-2008, 08:23 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
laserblue2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-28-05
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
220 isnt really feasible with out high compression is it???

also can you get 25hp from an exhaust and intake???
Old 02-21-2008, 08:44 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
montecarloman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-24-06
Location: Warranty Chevrolet, Maryland
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tru2nrtt777
I am looking at building a N/A 2.2 capable of about 220 crank hp, I already have a small mods list and would perfer some experienced builders advice.

So far on my list(some already done some still waiting on the paper):
Mod............................................... .Approx gain compounded
Full exhaust(high flow cat).................15hp
CAI............................................... ..10hp
JBP stage 3 cams.............................23hp

What are some things I could do to bump that up? I dont want to run 93 since around here some stations only have 91. I am hoping to(at the most) run 89. I have heard more compression but I really have no experience in that field.
Well if your shooting that high with N/A might get a new head. Higher flow #'s with CNC porting does wonders, and you can get the head milled to bump the compression. Its very possible to run 11/1 compression with proper tuning which brings us to the heart of the matter. At the moment the only things avaliable are piggy back units. They work just fine but have rudimentary control. There is a company doing a beta test right now on 2.2 tuning but a final product may not be avaliable for quite sometime. The stage 3 cams are a bit much IMO. With the factory rev limiter in place the engine stops spinning at 6500 rpms? I havent seen thoughs cams but I can assume that they are going to make power real high in the rpm range. Maybe outside of the factory rev limit which is another factor to think about.
Old 02-21-2008, 05:50 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tru2nrtt777's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-08-08
Location: Fayetteville/Linden, NC/Myrtle Beach, SC
Posts: 3,728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have gone to 7k before, i am an auto and was in low gear, it seems on my car the limit is at 7250 and in low gear it is roughly 72 miles per hour.
Old 02-21-2008, 05:54 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
XM15's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-16-06
Location: CT
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, for a high rev setup and without regard for price, I would say:

Intake and full exhaust (duh )
Ported TB
2.4 Intake manifold
Stage 1 or 2 Patriot Performance Head w/valvetrain
Higher Compression Pistons
Stage 2 cams
Piggyback
Old 02-21-2008, 06:00 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tru2nrtt777's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-08-08
Location: Fayetteville/Linden, NC/Myrtle Beach, SC
Posts: 3,728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now you see I like your style. :P
Old 02-21-2008, 07:42 PM
  #12  
New Member
 
levelzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-05-06
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Listed in order of simplest to hardest:

CAI
Exhaust
Cams (the stage threes will be fine, but they are not anywhere near the claimed gains)
Balance shaft delete
Ported Head (upgraded valve train is a good idea for higher revs)
11:1 pistons (might as well do the rods while you are in there)
Tuning
Old 02-22-2008, 04:03 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
HunterKiller89's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-20-06
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by tru2nrtt777
I have gone to 7k before, i am an auto and was in low gear, it seems on my car the limit is at 7250 and in low gear it is roughly 72 miles per hour.
72mph is my redline in 2nd gear at 6500rpm....your not revving to 7250rpm
Old 02-22-2008, 04:11 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Cobalt4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-09-06
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wouldnt meth be able to help him with high compression to up the octaine count?? that way he could run 85 and be near about 100 octaine??

From what AIS said it would help even with NA
Old 02-22-2008, 04:32 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
HunterKiller89's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-20-06
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Cobalt4Life
wouldnt meth be able to help him with high compression to up the octaine count?? that way he could run 85 and be near about 100 octaine??

From what AIS said it would help even with NA
it can, but under heavier part throttle conditions (throttle position 50%-90%), you would probably still knock. You wouldnt be giving enough gas for your meth to run, but still be pushing enough power on a low octane fuel with high compression pistons to detonate.
Old 02-22-2008, 05:15 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Cobalt4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-09-06
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they do have the adjustable ones though, the progressive controller.. let me send the link to AIS..
Old 02-22-2008, 10:49 AM
  #17  
AIS
Non Authorized / Non-Supporting
 
AIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-17-07
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HunterKiller89
it can, but under heavier part throttle conditions (throttle position 50%-90%), you would probably still knock. You wouldnt be giving enough gas for your meth to run, but still be pushing enough power on a low octane fuel with high compression pistons to detonate.
We can use our progressive controller and flip the switch to run it in MAF mode and not boost.We could then set start and full points based off of the mass air output signal. Very easy to do.

A 50/50 mix would give a Cobalt NA application all the octane he needed. He could then run lower grade 85 or 87 octane.

Let me know if you have any other questions.
Old 02-22-2008, 10:56 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
DebadgedBALT77's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-22-06
Location: nowheresville
Posts: 3,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by laserblue2006
220 isnt really feasible with out high compression is it???

also can you get 25hp from an exhaust and intake???



ahh noo. your not gonna be getting 25 hp from an intake and exhaust.

Id say with a really decent comp. ratio of about 11:1 maybe a tad higher you could get your 220 hp mark.

id go:
intake,
2.4 mani
valve train
High comp. pistons
rods if you want. not really nessacary
header, downpipe, exhaust.
lighter flywheel. im not sure if you auto/ manual?
and a really good tune

im confident that, that list would sit you damn lose to 200 or alittle above.
Old 02-22-2008, 01:12 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tru2nrtt777's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-08-08
Location: Fayetteville/Linden, NC/Myrtle Beach, SC
Posts: 3,728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HunterKiller89
72mph is my redline in 2nd gear at 6500rpm....your not revving to 7250rpm
Well then my rpm guage is off, it hit well past redline and slightly past 7k(hence me saying it seemed like around 7250). That was while I was at the dragstrip and didnt think I needed to upshift... I found out by hitting the limiter.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tru2nrtt777
2.2L L61 Performance Tech
27
02-13-2008 08:19 PM



Quick Reply: More Theory



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:23 AM.