More Theory
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 02-08-08
Location: Fayetteville/Linden, NC/Myrtle Beach, SC
Posts: 3,728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
More Theory
I am looking at building a N/A 2.2 capable of about 220 crank hp, I already have a small mods list and would perfer some experienced builders advice.
So far on my list(some already done some still waiting on the paper):
Mod............................................... .Approx gain compounded
Full exhaust(high flow cat).................15hp
CAI............................................... ..10hp
JBP stage 3 cams.............................23hp
What are some things I could do to bump that up? I dont want to run 93 since around here some stations only have 91. I am hoping to(at the most) run 89. I have heard more compression but I really have no experience in that field.
So far on my list(some already done some still waiting on the paper):
Mod............................................... .Approx gain compounded
Full exhaust(high flow cat).................15hp
CAI............................................... ..10hp
JBP stage 3 cams.............................23hp
What are some things I could do to bump that up? I dont want to run 93 since around here some stations only have 91. I am hoping to(at the most) run 89. I have heard more compression but I really have no experience in that field.
#2
Well, if you go with higher compression, you need to go with higher octane. Thats why GM recommends higher octane for the 2.4 than the 2.2.
You could probably bump the compression up another half point to 10.5:1 and run 89. The 2.4 is 10.4:1.
Also, you could build the valvetrain so you could raise the rev limit up much higher. That coupled with the appropriate cam would give you a really good boost in power.
You could probably bump the compression up another half point to 10.5:1 and run 89. The 2.4 is 10.4:1.
Also, you could build the valvetrain so you could raise the rev limit up much higher. That coupled with the appropriate cam would give you a really good boost in power.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-25-06
Location: USAG Stuttgart, GER
Posts: 1,860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, if you go with higher compression, you need to go with higher octane. Thats why GM recommends higher octane for the 2.4 than the 2.2.
You could probably bump the compression up another half point to 10.5:1 and run 89. The 2.4 is 10.4:1.
Also, you could build the valvetrain so you could raise the rev limit up much higher. That coupled with the appropriate cam would give you a really good boost in power.
You could probably bump the compression up another half point to 10.5:1 and run 89. The 2.4 is 10.4:1.
Also, you could build the valvetrain so you could raise the rev limit up much higher. That coupled with the appropriate cam would give you a really good boost in power.
A great addition to your list would be a lighter flywheel and neutral balance shafts. Free up some weight on the engine, it should free up a good amount of power. You may not want to go with Stage 3 cams tho because there isnt tuning tested with them yet. Start with stage 1 or 2 and test out tuning using a piggyback. See if you can use them to their fullest then if you can, sell the stage 2's and go with stage 3 if you really want, but I dont see them working right without a standalone. You could easily make 200whp NA if you could up the rev limit, stage 1 cams, higher compression, neutral shafts, lighter flywheel and a decent tune.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: 01-24-06
Location: Warranty Chevrolet, Maryland
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am looking at building a N/A 2.2 capable of about 220 crank hp, I already have a small mods list and would perfer some experienced builders advice.
So far on my list(some already done some still waiting on the paper):
Mod............................................... .Approx gain compounded
Full exhaust(high flow cat).................15hp
CAI............................................... ..10hp
JBP stage 3 cams.............................23hp
What are some things I could do to bump that up? I dont want to run 93 since around here some stations only have 91. I am hoping to(at the most) run 89. I have heard more compression but I really have no experience in that field.
So far on my list(some already done some still waiting on the paper):
Mod............................................... .Approx gain compounded
Full exhaust(high flow cat).................15hp
CAI............................................... ..10hp
JBP stage 3 cams.............................23hp
What are some things I could do to bump that up? I dont want to run 93 since around here some stations only have 91. I am hoping to(at the most) run 89. I have heard more compression but I really have no experience in that field.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 02-08-08
Location: Fayetteville/Linden, NC/Myrtle Beach, SC
Posts: 3,728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have gone to 7k before, i am an auto and was in low gear, it seems on my car the limit is at 7250 and in low gear it is roughly 72 miles per hour.
#10
So, for a high rev setup and without regard for price, I would say:
Intake and full exhaust (duh )
Ported TB
2.4 Intake manifold
Stage 1 or 2 Patriot Performance Head w/valvetrain
Higher Compression Pistons
Stage 2 cams
Piggyback
Intake and full exhaust (duh )
Ported TB
2.4 Intake manifold
Stage 1 or 2 Patriot Performance Head w/valvetrain
Higher Compression Pistons
Stage 2 cams
Piggyback
#12
Listed in order of simplest to hardest:
CAI
Exhaust
Cams (the stage threes will be fine, but they are not anywhere near the claimed gains)
Balance shaft delete
Ported Head (upgraded valve train is a good idea for higher revs)
11:1 pistons (might as well do the rods while you are in there)
Tuning
CAI
Exhaust
Cams (the stage threes will be fine, but they are not anywhere near the claimed gains)
Balance shaft delete
Ported Head (upgraded valve train is a good idea for higher revs)
11:1 pistons (might as well do the rods while you are in there)
Tuning
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-09-06
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wouldnt meth be able to help him with high compression to up the octaine count?? that way he could run 85 and be near about 100 octaine??
From what AIS said it would help even with NA
From what AIS said it would help even with NA
#17
Non Authorized / Non-Supporting
Join Date: 10-17-07
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it can, but under heavier part throttle conditions (throttle position 50%-90%), you would probably still knock. You wouldnt be giving enough gas for your meth to run, but still be pushing enough power on a low octane fuel with high compression pistons to detonate.
A 50/50 mix would give a Cobalt NA application all the octane he needed. He could then run lower grade 85 or 87 octane.
Let me know if you have any other questions.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-22-06
Location: nowheresville
Posts: 3,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ahh noo. your not gonna be getting 25 hp from an intake and exhaust.
Id say with a really decent comp. ratio of about 11:1 maybe a tad higher you could get your 220 hp mark.
id go:
intake,
2.4 mani
valve train
High comp. pistons
rods if you want. not really nessacary
header, downpipe, exhaust.
lighter flywheel. im not sure if you auto/ manual?
and a really good tune
im confident that, that list would sit you damn lose to 200 or alittle above.
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 02-08-08
Location: Fayetteville/Linden, NC/Myrtle Beach, SC
Posts: 3,728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well then my rpm guage is off, it hit well past redline and slightly past 7k(hence me saying it seemed like around 7250). That was while I was at the dragstrip and didnt think I needed to upshift... I found out by hitting the limiter.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NJHK
General Cobalt
150
03-23-2015 09:55 PM