Stage 3 Comp Cams....Anyone done it???
dan is pretty busy, should have pics online though
as far as changing it, we talked about that today haha. he said that they werent really selling any of the first model just because they werent deep into the balt market yet. he tossed the jig for it and then a few years later when they decided to start making it again, they redesigned it a bit. he said it should give any diff in performance as far as changing it up. no fitment issues with it and its performed great!
as far as changing it, we talked about that today haha. he said that they werent really selling any of the first model just because they werent deep into the balt market yet. he tossed the jig for it and then a few years later when they decided to start making it again, they redesigned it a bit. he said it should give any diff in performance as far as changing it up. no fitment issues with it and its performed great!
It shouldn't give any difference in performance?.. They didn't even dyno it?
I would assume there would be a difference in performance.. It was a totally different design..
not a totally diff design, just that the pairs of headers were swapped.
they didnt dyno it back then cause no one was buying parts on the scale they do now haha
and you are correct, i miss spelled, it SHOULDNT give any difference
they didnt dyno it back then cause no one was buying parts on the scale they do now haha
and you are correct, i miss spelled, it SHOULDNT give any difference
My limiter hits at like 7,000.. Or whatever it is for the stock 5-speed..
Not for much longer though!
stock limiter is 6.5k
hucker and i both are up at 7.5k lol
as far as pairing the cyl, from what i have gathered while talking with them, it doestn really seem to matter much at all perf wise. im sure you do gain an adv one way or the other, but not enough to really matter. the one i have is the original design
hucker and i both are up at 7.5k lol
as far as pairing the cyl, from what i have gathered while talking with them, it doestn really seem to matter much at all perf wise. im sure you do gain an adv one way or the other, but not enough to really matter. the one i have is the original design
im not doing that now though, have to refocus some energy from the car to getting some bills taken care of and some college work done.
and really...we dont make ENOUGH power up there to really justify it without ALOT of other mods to make it worthwhile
i certainly wont do either till my engine is pulled and built
oh god what is with you guys and the balance delete kit? I rode in a lsj with that and i think i lost some fillings. The vibrations are about the equiv of welding your motor straight to your frame with no bushings.
8100 it my dream. here my scenario.
1-7800
2-8000
3-7700
4-7200
i ll finish my ź in ž of my third gears.
now at 7500, i m limit to finish it in third gear
Last edited by huckernage; Feb 13, 2010 at 11:46 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
stock limiter is 6.5k
hucker and i both are up at 7.5k lol
as far as pairing the cyl, from what i have gathered while talking with them, it doestn really seem to matter much at all perf wise. im sure you do gain an adv one way or the other, but not enough to really matter. the one i have is the original design
hucker and i both are up at 7.5k lol
as far as pairing the cyl, from what i have gathered while talking with them, it doestn really seem to matter much at all perf wise. im sure you do gain an adv one way or the other, but not enough to really matter. the one i have is the original design
WOT + cold street = OOPS!
I see no reason for the balance delete kit, or the neutral kit. Not for us anyway.. LSJ/LNF, sure.
it makes sense cause you can then rev out to 8k plus
and for cams, that can be AWESOME!
as for the 6.5k...it makes sense to leave it there unless you need it higher....
and as for my setup...its pending pymnt/ delivery....so pretty much sold already :P
and for cams, that can be AWESOME!as for the 6.5k...it makes sense to leave it there unless you need it higher....
and as for my setup...its pending pymnt/ delivery....so pretty much sold already :P
I'm sure there is a bit of lee-way, but I'm no expert.
Very nice! When tuned by Trifecta, will the rev be raised?.. I'm always afraid to hit it, can't really be good for the car as that's basically the motor saying okay the internals can't handle much more, we're going to cut you off now.
I'm sure there is a bit of lee-way, but I'm no expert.
I'm sure there is a bit of lee-way, but I'm no expert.
hit it at 6500 not that bad. hit it 7500 not good but **** happen.
- when i suggest a rpm setpoint i always put higher that he ask for.
if i put yours at 7500 and you always shift at 7100 you wont never hit it and have some fun.
yes it up to you. 5900-6666-7200-7600. you choice it.
hit it at 6500 not that bad. hit it 7500 not good but **** happen.
- when i suggest a rpm setpoint i always put higher that he ask for.
if i put yours at 7500 and you always shift at 7100 you wont never hit it and have some fun.
hit it at 6500 not that bad. hit it 7500 not good but **** happen.
- when i suggest a rpm setpoint i always put higher that he ask for.
if i put yours at 7500 and you always shift at 7100 you wont never hit it and have some fun.
if i were you i would say set it at 7100rpm ish
yes it up to you. 5900-6666-7200-7600. you choice it.
hit it at 6500 not that bad. hit it 7500 not good but **** happen.
- when i suggest a rpm setpoint i always put higher that he ask for.
if i put yours at 7500 and you always shift at 7100 you wont never hit it and have some fun.
hit it at 6500 not that bad. hit it 7500 not good but **** happen.
- when i suggest a rpm setpoint i always put higher that he ask for.
if i put yours at 7500 and you always shift at 7100 you wont never hit it and have some fun.
if i were you i would say set it at 7100rpm ish
Last edited by NWAE Cobalt; Feb 15, 2010 at 12:51 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Is it possible to break anything hitting the stock limiter?.. If you bump it up then you're pushing the motor farther than it was intended, and sure to break something.
---------------
On a side note, NightHawk: I honestly think a 3" cat-back is too big.. I wouldn't use anything over 2.5" for N/A.. Even WITH cams.
My 2˘
My reasoning: To reduce additional backpressure, the OEM exhaust tubing can be replaced with madrel-bent tubing of the same size or one size up from the OEM. As a general rule, you can enlarge the pipe diameter of your OEM exhaust system by 1/4- to 1/2-inch to increase your horsepower. However, any additional increase in pipe diameter is likely to decrease your performance; specifically, low end torque.
Bigger is not always better.
Up to 250 Horsepower is best served by a 2 1/2" exhaust.
I'm not saying anything bad against you, I'm just throwing it out there. I got it from the MagnaFlow website.
Last edited by xxxxsh4d0wxxxx; Feb 15, 2010 at 01:19 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

Although, if you have the right size primaries then the system behind that really shouldn't cause to you lose too much.
Last edited by xxxxsh4d0wxxxx; Feb 16, 2010 at 09:58 AM.


