would a 2.2 in an 06 cobalt lt be able to house a turbo styled supercharger?

 

You mean a procharger?

 

yeah.

 

I only know of one and hes here in Houston, hes not on the forums, and I know little details other then yes its possible. It was on a lsj not that it makes much of a difference.

 

elecblue06 had a centrifugal blower on his LE5 Ion. It can work, just need the right mounting bracket

 

Elecblue had one on his 2.4, don't c y u couldn't get one...u just need th right bra kdt and.belt set up....

 

It'll work, but it isn't exactly an optimal/cost effective setup.

 

Would be more wise to just turbo it.

 

ya agreed. i find it dumb to do it that way. itll be hard as **** to get setup right.

 

right now im looking at about $3500 for a procharger c1. could anyone list all the internals that are made for the 2006 2.2l. i cant find the one that has the list for the aftermarket head, pistons, and everything.

 

ok one more question? whats the difference between the 2.2 L61 and the 2.2 LAP? this is my first cobalt and its an 06 lt.

 

you have the L61 with an 06

second of all is it your daily driver? and 3500 sounds a little cheap honestly for a procharger setup

 

Turbo style supercharger lol

 

ok thanks. and its just the c1 procharger and the intercooler and everything but the brackets. thats not installing it or or rebuilding the motor. and no its not my daily driver.

 

go straight turbo, less fabrication involved, cheaper, and more potential power.

 

ok, you wanted a procharger system, not a twin charge system, that has the turbo feeding a supercharger like the eaton m62.
3500 is too much for just a supercharged system, zzp has a kit for 2275 (right here Cobalt & Ion ---> ZZ Performance) thats designed for the cobalt, you just have to go through trifecta for the tune (you'll be adding like 80-100ish whp with the stage 2 from what they say) then you can do a full exhaust headers back for less than the 1225 difference.
or zzp offers a turbo with different stages (here from 2k to 3500 depending on the stage) again designed for the 2.2/2.4 cobalt engine.

Hockeyman a turbo set up is less fabrication work then supercharged set up in my opinion

 

i know what yall mean but ive seen an auto with a turbo get beat by a auto with a procharger. both of them were built the same way with the same components and the procharged one won by 5 links in the 1/4

 

and that was the only difference between the two cars?
they had the same tire set up, same weight, same exhaust, same engine mounts, tran mounts?

 

idk about all that but they were built to compare the 2. and something else. i was on youtube looking about and i seen a cobalt ss twincharged? pushing 440 hp. what the hell is twin charged? sorry if it sounds stupid but ive been 4 wheel drive my whole life and wanted to try something else

 

Procharger is a brand. Lol. The correct term is centrifugal supercharger.

 

Where they use a blower and a turbo
i.e. the Cobalt SS retains the stock supercharger and adds a turbo.

 

Would a rebuild be necessary for the 2.2? I know they have a kit for the 2.2 with an eaton supercharger but how do they bolt in a turbo?

 

The supercharger bolts on the intake side of the engine and the turbo bolts to the exhaust side. If you did it on a 2.2 I would assume you would have to build the engine. But then again, I don't know if anyone has twincharged a 2.2 before. If I were you and you were dead set on it I would talk to ZZP about it cause they could help you more.

 

Ok thanks. Cuz after seeing that one I'm setting my goals for it.

 

Sell your car and get a SC or TC; it'll be cheaper in the long run.