kid? talk about yourself, i dont say such things as "your idiot" or do some research kid ... im a bit more ... respectful sorry

We never specified at the crank or to the wheels and normally you talk about the crank cause its more... of a known power information... your so picking on the details my god cant you admit your wrong? anyway lets continue

ok your right automatics are 4 speed, but i never talked about such thing as autos in my head you cant crank up an auto car to that much hp its stupid and senseless its meanless, i got plenty of other synonymes if you want but you got the point, why get an auto if you want to go higher then 250?

But I liked how you tried to speak about the only thing I COULD be wrong, that was the transmission hp limit, and did not talk about the other things that u didnt know about and didnt argu more about cause i showed you proofs...

Reading a post about ZZP on the forum (im sure i can find it and after base the same opinions that you gave me) is fairly easy lmao

But to conclude this stupid argument debate about nothing that important I would say we should stop waisting our time debating on such senseless things that wont change nothing. IMO its just a ego thing no? Think about that KID!! xD hahaha lmao!!!

 

you should be banned

 

*sigh* ... why lol having a discution isnt always friendly

 

BC you don't know What the **** your talking about

 

ok if proofs doesnt work with you guys ill just leave it this way

 

all cobalts have manual transmissions? false

all cobalts have the same transmissons ? false

cobalt transmissions can hangle 600 hp ? false

lnfs make 260/260whp right out of the box? false

any other stupid comments to add?

 

haha i think theres a miss understood here.. maybe you should learn english read alot better when some writes something or i should be more clear about my points...

I said resumed it means I know there 4 speed auto i even state it in the first words but i bsaid autos are not ment to race with and i added some opinions of my own.

About the 600 hp i said : What more should i say?

About the 260 hp i said : But even if i didnt specified at the crank in one of my first posts i did say :

Where do you see the W ? i wonder haha

*sigh*

 

yea your a complete idiot not just 4/5ths anymore everyone proved you wrong im done with this thread. Some people that are on this forum really just need to sit there and be quiet..... i have more to say but il just end it there. you will just make yourself look more stupid if you even respond.

 

your arguments were jsut ridiculously stupid...

 

whats wrong with an auto having more than 250 hp?
mine will have 250 horse sometime soon. its an auto. whether i go aftermarket auto or 5 speed is up to me. but dont rag on autos. hell i bet quite a few auto trans balts will smack your precious 5 speed across the face.

 

i was gonna say this myself^^ thank you sir. lol this thread has turned into stupid

 

the funny part is both silver and red are both wrong. lol i guess apparently if you have a color in your name you apparently dont know things lol

ok .. so if you cant push lnf power out of the F23 tranny before needed a tranny upgrade.. explain all the boosted 2.4s.. that use the same tranny as the 2.2's.. the gear ratio makes not that much of a difference in whp as much as it'll make a difference in acceleration and top speed of the gears..

not to mention there are a bunch of boosted 2.2's that put down stock lnf numbers .. and he was probably close on 10 psi

 

are we thinkin of the same red 2.2 cobalt with that pushed like 258whp on 10 psi?

 

you mean the one with the remote mount turbo? that pushed 270 whp on 12 psi if i remember correctly.. but if so .. thats only one person i was thinking of lol but he's an auto

 

he redyno'd? nice. but yea, that was the car i was thinkin of lol. i wonder wat tundraboarder222 is pushing, he has a auto as well

 

yea i uesd to talk to him every so often on yahoo... he dynoed 258 whp when he had some tuning issues.. they fixedit .. and bumped up the powah lol actually i think it was 270 at 10 psi still

 

not bad at all

 

speaking of my 250 hp sometime soon. I pick up my turbo kit next Saturday. Quite possibly the first CSS.net 2010 lap turbo? Don't know the others

 

Haters will hate... I never said an auto cant handle more then 250 hp.. I said in my opinion its useless and when i see something like that i just laugh at ppl doing that with autos thats it.

 

if you think it's useless you need to go back school for auto ****.. the fastest drag cars are auto.. they're more consistent.. and shift faster. hell the manual ones are clutchless sequential "manuals" so i dont even think that counts

not to mention.. you dont lose spool when an auto shifts..

 

Agree:
my auto handles 272whp/276wtq @10psi just fine.

 

Why are you talking about speed? I'm talking about feeling and momentum... And control...

Its just that anyone can drive an auto and it will drive the same... Manuals are more about skills...

And i like to control my car with the speeds thats it..

 

cuz you're saying you "laugh at and auto with work done" common man.. a tuned auto will be as fast and feel the same given the same power ..

control yea manuals have more control for things like in the snow and bad conditions

but still a tuned auto tranny will have better down shifting and such as far as modding is concerned a car with XXX whp will be faster then a 5 spd car with the same XXX whp

 

your just jealous my 2010 will smack your 2010

 

WTF did I really heard that?! HAAHHAHAHA