2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

Dyno'd the 2.4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 07:29 PM
  #1  
Dj_BuCa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-06-07
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: Saskatoon,SK
Dyno'd the 2.4

160whp
165wtq

Injen CAI, tune. That's it.

I have the dyno sheet, but don't think it's necessary to post it. I'm pretty happy. It's right around what I expected.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 07:34 PM
  #2  
REDFOCZ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-22-06
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Not bad what type of dyno was it?
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 07:42 PM
  #3  
Dj_BuCa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-06-07
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: Saskatoon,SK
Originally Posted by REDFOCZ
Not bad what type of dyno was it?
Mustang dyno.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 08:17 PM
  #4  
Red07SSNA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-08-06
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 2
From: *
Originally Posted by Dj_BuCa
160whp
165wtq

Injen CAI, tune. That's it.

I have the dyno sheet, but don't think it's necessary to post it. I'm pretty happy. It's right around what I expected.
Please post the dyno sheet -- want to see where the peaks are.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 08:20 PM
  #5  
smartdude24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-09-07
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
From: :)
more tq, but less hp than what gm claims or is the 171 not the whp?
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 08:29 PM
  #6  
Dj_BuCa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-06-07
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: Saskatoon,SK
Originally Posted by smartdude24
more tq, but less hp than what gm claims or is the 171 not the whp?
171 is not the whp. I think average stock #'s are anywhere from 145-155??

Originally Posted by Red07SSNA
Please post the dyno sheet -- want to see where the peaks are.

I'll see what I can do for the sheet. By the looks of it, the tq peaked at around 4000rpm, and the hp peaked around 6100. The hp dropped off just after 6300rpm and the tq started to fall after 5000. The Air fuel was flat right across the whole run at 6.3.

I've never seen a more smooth gradual increase in power through a dyno sheet before.

Last edited by Dj_BuCa; Oct 11, 2008 at 08:30 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 08:32 PM
  #7  
smartdude24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-09-07
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
From: :)
ah, thought so. in that case, good numbers.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 08:33 PM
  #8  
Red07SSNA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-08-06
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 2
From: *
Was your torque pretty flat too with a dip at 3500-4000, if so the 2.4s seem to be consistant (06-07 2.4Ls)?
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 08:39 PM
  #9  
Dj_BuCa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-06-07
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: Saskatoon,SK
I'm happy with the numbers. 160whp isn't much these days, nor much to brag about, but I'll tak eit.

My buddy's turbo'd b16 Civic put down 220whp, and we determined his car makes all it's power between 6700-8000 rpm, haha. only put down 130wtq tho. Typical honda.

Originally Posted by Red07SSNA
Was your torque pretty flat too with a dip at 3500-4000, if so the 2.4s seem to be consistant (06-07 2.4Ls)?

Yeah the torque was fairly flat, 3600rpm - 5000rpm was above 160 on the graph. And yes it did dip slightly, but at 4100rpm, and only for a brief second.

Last edited by Dj_BuCa; Oct 11, 2008 at 08:39 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 08:41 PM
  #10  
_UnLiMiTeD_'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-15-08
Posts: 4,339
Likes: 0
From: Maple Ridge, B.C Canada
a turbo in these can make 300 easily so 220 is not that impressive, but like u said,its a honda lol
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 08:44 PM
  #11  
Red07SSNA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-08-06
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 2
From: *
Originally Posted by Dj_BuCa
My buddy's turbo'd b16 Civic put down 220whp, and we determined his car makes all it's power between 6700-8000 rpm, haha. only put down 130wtq tho. Typical honda.
The torque might be laughable but the HP can be utilized with really steep gears -- that's why the SIs have 4.77:1 gears!!!
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 08:46 PM
  #12  
Dj_BuCa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-06-07
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: Saskatoon,SK
Originally Posted by _UnLiMiTeD_
a turbo in these can make 300 easily so 220 is not that impressive, but like u said,its a honda lol

Oh I know. I was jsut poking fun at the fact his car makes nothing for power until 6700rpm, haha. It was basically floating around 140 until then. I'll give him credit tho, he only finished the install this mornign and only had a couple hours to tune it.

It was a free Dyno day, so there were a few cars to go through, meaning each car only got one pull. I wish I could have maybe had 2 or 3, but oh well. There was a JDM300ZX that almost broke 400whp. Other than that, it was mostly gutless civic's, integra's, crx's, and a couple VW's.

There was an '06 Civic SIR with I/H/E and he only mustered I think 150whp....? It was kinda neat to see peoples reactions to mine. I think they were expecting pretty low numbers from the N/A SS
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
KMO43
Front Page News
33
Jan 12, 2016 12:01 AM
patooyee
2.4L LE5 Performance Tech
50
Oct 15, 2015 05:11 PM
maliki778
Dyno Results
4
Oct 1, 2015 07:39 PM
KMO43
Featured Car Showcase
37
Sep 27, 2015 08:53 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:01 PM.