2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

Why 2.0 instead of 2.4?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 24, 2008 | 03:57 PM
  #26  
shabodah's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-21-06
Posts: 2,270
Likes: 1
From: Midwest
Originally Posted by mike25
sleeves shouldnt be too hard to come across
I know of lots of places to buy sleeves, but very few who will install them.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2008 | 04:08 PM
  #27  
mike25's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-07-06
Posts: 7,224
Likes: 1
From: west virginia
Originally Posted by shabodah
I know of lots of places to buy sleeves, but very few who will install them.
with the proper know how..one could do it themselves
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2008 | 04:10 PM
  #28  
shabodah's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-21-06
Posts: 2,270
Likes: 1
From: Midwest
Originally Posted by mike25
with the proper know how..one could do it themselves
Actually, I know how to do it, but I don't trust myself to.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2008 | 04:12 PM
  #29  
mike25's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-07-06
Posts: 7,224
Likes: 1
From: west virginia
Originally Posted by shabodah
Actually, I know how to do it, but I don't trust myself to.
yea...that would be my case also
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2008 | 08:38 PM
  #30  
BlackBaltSSNA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-08-07
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, NC
Isnt the LNF coming with vvt due to the emissions thing?
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 08:46 AM
  #31  
shabodah's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-21-06
Posts: 2,270
Likes: 1
From: Midwest
Originally Posted by BlackBaltSSNA
Isnt the LNF coming with vvt due to the emissions thing?
The LNF has VVT and can spray fuel into the exhaust to light-off the cat quicker (one benefit of DI), both reducing emissions.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 08:50 AM
  #32  
Dead Zen's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-19-06
Posts: 6,982
Likes: 1
From: Beaver, PA (outside Pittsburgh)
so what about 2.0 liter cars having a perfect square design? all boosted mitsu motors (4g63) nissans sr20det
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 02:04 PM
  #33  
Kazuki's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 04-17-08
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Sooo, if GM were to spend some money upgrading the 2.4l rods and pistons and spend the same amount of money into the 2.4 as they did for the 2.0, the 2.4ls would actually be better correct?
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 02:09 PM
  #34  
WSFrazier's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-17-05
Posts: 5,844
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by Projekt
less displacement means more air into the cylinders or something along those lines...notice why ALOT of forced induction stock cars are 2.0L or lower..

its something like that..more boost or something..
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 02:11 PM
  #35  
originaladrian's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-22-06
Posts: 8,396
Likes: 0
From: S.FL
Originally Posted by WSFrazier
OMG LMAO
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 02:14 PM
  #36  
shabodah's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-21-06
Posts: 2,270
Likes: 1
From: Midwest
Originally Posted by Dead Zen
so what about 2.0 liter cars having a perfect square design? all boosted mitsu motors (4g63) nissans sr20det
Oversquare motors do just as well. Perfectly "square" doesn't net you anything more than just over or just under has.

The 2.4L engine could have been upgraded, sure. Heck, the LSJ and LNF are more similiar to both SRT-4 motors than people would believe, and well, since the new SRT-4 motor is extremely similiar to the new Evo motor, well, there are more similiarities than differences.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 02:16 PM
  #37  
06blackg85ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-06
Posts: 15,211
Likes: 20
From: New York
lol wow this thread is terrible.
LSJ is a destroked version, 86mm bore x 86mm stroke. better for high rpm usage as in drag racing since they rev over 10krpm. you can't really do that with a long stroke motor without creating damaging crankshaft harmonics and all other types of bad crap.
There's more, but I really don't feel like going through it, though a built up 2.4 litre bottom end with an LSJ head probably would make some rediculous power with a turbo setup, too bad the one guy with that setup sold the car, or is
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 02:16 PM
  #38  
Witt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-06
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by Kazuki
Just out of curiosity, since I'm still new to the racing world, why did chevy decide to use the 2.0 litre and supercharge that, instead of super charging the 2.4? The 2.4 is what, 171hp stock?? and The SS/SC is 206 hp stock?? We're only 30'ish hp behind. And isnt like the turbo'ed or SC 2.4's faster than the 2.0's? I dunno, I might be wrong, but if anyone can make this clear for me, it would be appreciated! Thanks guys.
It was destroked to increase top end horsepower and lower piston speed for a higher redline and less wear on the engine.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 02:20 PM
  #39  
shabodah's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-21-06
Posts: 2,270
Likes: 1
From: Midwest
To restate things in a different way:

The LSJ was two liters with a short stroke because GM was still unsure on its exact durability and didn't want a lot of warranty claims.

The LS9 is 638 horses for the same reason.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
red9
2.4L LE5 Performance Tech
11
Oct 4, 2017 02:23 AM
HEATON
Parts
12
Oct 16, 2015 07:21 PM
patooyee
2.4L LE5 Performance Tech
50
Oct 15, 2015 05:11 PM
Jesse
Problems/Service/Maintenance
2
Sep 28, 2015 12:51 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:58 AM.