2010+ Future Cruze Discussions Discussions and information related to the upcoming 2010 Chevy Cruze
View Poll Results: Would you like to see a Cruze SS produced?
YES
88.43%
NO
11.57%
Voters: 432. You may not vote on this poll

*** GM Performance Cruze SS *** What would u like to see?

Old Nov 13, 2008 | 05:56 PM
  #151  
G85 SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-25-07
Posts: 6,003
Likes: 0
From: Kissimmee, Fl
I notice the spoiler was removed from the picture...

I would like to have a high rise spoiler, just one that is more stable and doesn't threaten to fly away in the wind when I drive. And it doesn't have to look complex, just accent the lines of the vehicle.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 10:45 PM
  #152  
knighthawk's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 10-09-08
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Merrimack,NH
I say leave the cruze to be the economy car they are trying to make it in the first place.

Then keep the cobalt line but get rid of the lower end modles and only offer the cobalt in the 2 ss modles one na the other either tc or sc. Also use the concept from the first page for the new cobalt ss b/c the name cruze just dsn't belong on that concept car.

This way everyone is happy.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2008 | 10:23 AM
  #153  
SS4EVER's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-08
Posts: 1,524
Likes: 0
From: Metro Detroit, Mi
Originally Posted by knighthawk
I say leave the cruze to be the economy car they are trying to make it in the first place.

Then keep the cobalt line but get rid of the lower end modles and only offer the cobalt in the 2 ss modles one na the other either tc or sc. Also use the concept from the first page for the new cobalt ss b/c the name cruze just dsn't belong on that concept car.

This way everyone is happy.
A good way to look at it. But I don't think GM is going to plan on keeping the Cobalt very long into the Cruze's production. Two FWD sub compacts is overkill in Chevy's lineup, then with the Aveo compact that's three. However I do like the idea.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2008 | 10:52 AM
  #154  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Originally Posted by knighthawk
This way everyone is happy.
Except GM, which is all that really matters.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2008 | 10:56 AM
  #155  
N8s07SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-19-06
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
From: Grand Rapids, MI
RWD, RWD, RWD, RWD

already have the technology from the Solstice coupe.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2008 | 11:03 AM
  #156  
elecblue06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-19-07
Posts: 14,901
Likes: 1
From: newburgh,ny
Originally Posted by N8s07SS
RWD, RWD, RWD, RWD

already have the technology from the Solstice coupe.
that would be interesting.. looking at the s2k, mustang, genisis, koup, evo, and sti crowd then(yes i know the last two are AWD but still.. ) i think it might be a good idea
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2008 | 11:04 AM
  #157  
N8s07SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-19-06
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by rallyracer
That list you see is the one I created before I started this thread...I have not added anything to it.

The only thing Ive updated to that post is some wording to make things easier to read and I changed push start button to key less ignition.


I had planned on just emailing GM Performance with my own ideas but I figured Id see if you guys were able to come up with anything interesting...So far not much has been talked about that I did not already have on my list.
What about wheel options? Why not offer the wheels in diff. finishes (chrome, polished, gunmetal, black, etc.)

Another must is to perfect the RPD but incorporate it into the guage cluster or dash, but keep the boost guage on the Apillar. That is a pretty impressive piece of technology that no other competitors offer to my knowledge?
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2008 | 11:07 AM
  #158  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Originally Posted by N8s07SS
RWD, RWD, RWD, RWD

already have the technology from the Solstice coupe.
"Technology" what do you mean by that? Is the Solstice coupe on Delta II?
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2008 | 11:12 AM
  #159  
N8s07SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-19-06
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by elecblue06
that would be interesting.. looking at the s2k, mustang, genisis, koup, evo, and sti crowd then(yes i know the last two are AWD but still.. ) i think it might be a good idea
Exactly, name me ONE significant FWD performance car released before 2000. Not sure I can.

Originally Posted by Acey
"Technology" what do you mean by that? Is the Solstice coupe on Delta II?
I guess by technology I meant the application of the LNF on a RWD platform. As far as I know there are no plans to do another Solstice. Yes I know it will never happen, but could Chevy at least get a Solstice coupe-like vehicle?

Last edited by N8s07SS; Nov 14, 2008 at 11:12 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2008 | 11:18 AM
  #160  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Sorry I just got home from a night shift, my brain is like mush. Solstice hardtop is still on Kappa, Delta II is AWD/FWD, not sure what Kappa has to do with any possible Cruze SS.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2008 | 12:40 PM
  #161  
SS4EVER's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-08
Posts: 1,524
Likes: 0
From: Metro Detroit, Mi
The Kappas are dead after 2011/2012.

GM lost a lot of $$ with the Solstice & Sky. So we won't at least be seeing any RWD Cobalt on the Kappa platform....

Now GM's new Alpha platform is RWD, and that takes components of both the Zeta, and Kappa platform from my limited knowledge of it.

In order of size at least with RWD it goes like this Zeta > Alpha > Kappa (dead as of 2011/2012)
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2008 | 11:07 AM
  #162  
rallyracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-09-04
Posts: 9,440
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Anyone have any good messages that I should add to the email stating why its important the Cruze SS gets produced?
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2008 | 11:34 AM
  #163  
SEMAJ07's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-06-07
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
From: Holbrook, NY
well after reading through a few of the pages (oh and i LOVE the concept by the way!) I honestly have to say there are a few things I think it SHOULD have. Most importantly interior wise it should have soft to touch trim (like from the gti) this helps with rattles and noises and shouldnt be TOO expensive to put in the car. It should also have an in the dash navi system. Even Suzuki is doing this now...seriously! It should have better lateral support seats as well. As far as performance options, this is where it can get crazy! A lot of people are recommending this and that BUT once you add all of these things up (AWD etc...) now the car is beyond the price range that GM can make money on it AND sell it!! I am not bashing at all cause all of the things people said would be amazing to see!! But right now the general is going to try and make the cheapest car that they can make ANYTHING off of. So subtle things like a LSD (a must!!) and 2 or 3 rim options, also brembos are a must as well (but they can get those from the cobalt). I also believe that the SS models should be the 5sp in there now (this also saves money). The 6speed would only hinder the performance of the LNF because of the power curve it creates. More shifting equals slower times. If someone wants a model with an AUTO they should opt for a SPORT model with a 5 speed!!!!(i know this has been said, im just saying) with a detuned version of the LNF engine (using the same engine saves money AND will have potential if someone decided to mod it later on). There really is no need for a 3 engine lineup...Ok sorry about that guys lol i got carried away
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2008 | 11:38 AM
  #164  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
^^ The seats are fine. Navi shouldn't be standard IMO, that should be an option. If this is a performance car that wouldn't matter anyway. 2 or 3 rim options? Your post seemed plausible up until that point.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2008 | 12:30 PM
  #165  
rallyracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-09-04
Posts: 9,440
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by SEMAJ07
well after reading through a few of the pages (oh and i LOVE the concept by the way!) I honestly have to say there are a few things I think it SHOULD have. Most importantly interior wise it should have soft to touch trim (like from the gti) this helps with rattles and noises and shouldnt be TOO expensive to put in the car. It should also have an in the dash navi system. Even Suzuki is doing this now...seriously! It should have better lateral support seats as well. As far as performance options, this is where it can get crazy! A lot of people are recommending this and that BUT once you add all of these things up (AWD etc...) now the car is beyond the price range that GM can make money on it AND sell it!! I am not bashing at all cause all of the things people said would be amazing to see!! But right now the general is going to try and make the cheapest car that they can make ANYTHING off of. So subtle things like a LSD (a must!!) and 2 or 3 rim options, also brembos are a must as well (but they can get those from the cobalt). I also believe that the SS models should be the 5sp in there now (this also saves money). The 6speed would only hinder the performance of the LNF because of the power curve it creates. More shifting equals slower times. If someone wants a model with an AUTO they should opt for a SPORT model with a 5 speed!!!!(i know this has been said, im just saying) with a detuned version of the LNF engine (using the same engine saves money AND will have potential if someone decided to mod it later on). There really is no need for a 3 engine lineup...Ok sorry about that guys lol i got carried away
Great write up...Straight to the point and pretty much spot on
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2008 | 10:39 AM
  #166  
Gturismo1's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 03-17-05
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by rallyracer
Anyone have any good messages that I should add to the email stating why its important the Cruze SS gets produced?
I'd start off by saying GM has been making great strides with the Cobalt. It's not perfect, but it was light years better than the Cavalier. With everyone jumping in on the General for not making enough fuel efficient vehicles, having the reputation of only making trucks and gas guzzling V8 muscle cars, why not turn that argument on its head?

Why not give a Corvette Z06 style effort into making the Cruze SS a reality. Prove that not only can GM make a great compact car, but a compact car that can beat the snot out of every competitor in the segment, at a much lower price point. GM has a real good opportunity to start fresh with this car. Most people never gave the Cobalt a chance because they thought it was too much like a Cavalier. Most people don't even take seriously the astounding performance of the new Cobalt SS/TC, simply because the Cobalt has made its reputation on the rental fleet, not on the pages of Sport Compact Car.

Make the Cruze SS visually and mechanically distinguished enough from the base model that you know that it is something special. Then pack it with enough performance punch to keep the competition trembling in fear. Prove to the public that GM isn't a one trick pony that can only build V8 RWD muscle cars. Show them when a serious effort is put into a program, that a serious result will emerge.

Make a car that will be a credible threat to the STI and EVO crowd. You will not only have a shaken the stigma that GM can't do FWD performance, you'll be building a program that will continue to be honed, much like the Corvette is, that will assure maintained dominance in the segment.

Last but not least, as your building that car, picture Jeremy Clarkson driving it around the Top Gear test track, and all the things he will hate about this car, and eliminate those faults. Give this serious thought. Put him in a situation where he will be forced to admit that you've built a damn good car, much like he was with the ZR1
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2008 | 10:44 AM
  #167  
rallyracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-09-04
Posts: 9,440
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by Gturismo1
Last but not least, as your building that car, picture Jeremy Clarkson driving it around the Top Gear test track, and all the things he will hate about this car, and eliminate those faults. Give this serious thought. Put him in a situation where he will be forced to admit that you've built a damn good car, much like he was with the ZR1
...I'll add this into the email.

I haven't sent off the email yet due to all the **** going down the "big 3" ...I've been sort of holding out to see whats going to happen...but dont worry I think Im just gonna send it off anyways.

Last edited by rallyracer; Nov 22, 2008 at 01:16 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2008 | 10:57 AM
  #168  
Stetson's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 06-04-08
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
From: New York
Originally Posted by rallyracer
...I'll add this into the email.

I haven't sent off the email yet due to all the **** going down the "big 3" ...I've been sort of weighting to see whats going to happen...but dont worry I think Im just gonna send it off anyways.
yea thats what i was thinking, i hope it turns out ok, i kind of want to see the cruze make it to production, and see what it ends up like.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2008 | 11:00 AM
  #169  
Gturismo1's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 03-17-05
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by rallyracer
...I'll add this into the email.
Much appreciated
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2008 | 11:47 AM
  #170  
TorontoSS's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 06-14-07
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
AM i seeing things or do those seats say STI on it?
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2008 | 12:42 PM
  #171  
avro206's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-17-04
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
From: Calgary Alberta Canada
[QUOTE=Gturismo1;3125652ot turn that argument on its head?

Why not give a Corvette Z06 style effort into making the Cruze SS a reality. Prove that not only can GM make a great compact car, but a compact car that can beat the snot out of every competitor in the segment, at a much lower price point.

Make the Cruze SS visually and mechanically distinguished enough from the base model that you know that it is something special. Then pack it with enough performance punch to keep the competition trembling in fear.

Make a car that will be a credible threat to the STI and EVO crowd. You will not only have a shaken the stigma that GM can't do FWD performance, you'll be building a program that will continue to be honed, much like the Corvette is, that will assure maintained dominance in the segment.

)[/QUOTE]

While your goals are laudable--the Turbo Cobalt does most of what you say now. It's cheap, affordable to many and beats anything in its class.

I don't want an EVO/WRX priced Cruze. All the things you mention cost alot of money and an AWD 300HP Cruze would cost right in that same ball park.

I fail to see a much lower price point if theyu build car to go head to head with the EVO/WRX.

With the state oif GM and the economy thats just not going to happen.
Its neat to day dream about that stuff but its just not going anywhere.

Update the LNF, tweak it and drop it in a 2 and 4 dr Cruze. Maybe a DSG option? Keep the price resonable and they have a winner
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2008 | 01:16 PM
  #172  
rallyracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-09-04
Posts: 9,440
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by TorontoSS
AM i seeing things or do those seats say STI on it?
I'm using those seats as an example of what Id like to see in the Cruze SS.

Originally Posted by avro206
300HP Cruze would cost right in that same ball park.
All they'd have to do is put stage 1 on the LNF and sell it as stock and it would be right in about that area.

Last edited by rallyracer; Nov 22, 2008 at 10:01 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2008 | 09:37 PM
  #173  
Gturismo1's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 03-17-05
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by avro206
While your goals are laudable--the Turbo Cobalt does most of what you say now. It's cheap, affordable to many and beats anything in its class.

I don't want an EVO/WRX priced Cruze. All the things you mention cost alot of money and an AWD 300HP Cruze would cost right in that same ball park.

I fail to see a much lower price point if theyu build car to go head to head with the EVO/WRX.

With the state oif GM and the economy thats just not going to happen.
Its neat to day dream about that stuff but its just not going anywhere.

Update the LNF, tweak it and drop it in a 2 and 4 dr Cruze. Maybe a DSG option? Keep the price resonable and they have a winner
Never said anything about making it AWD. I spoke about making it approach that performance benchmark with FWD. This car needs to go toe-to-toe with things like the major competition it its class, drive layout notwithstanding.

I fail to see when I stated any of these apparent numerous things that will be cost prohibitive. Never said AWD. All I am saying is that General Motors should put the same effort as they did into the Z06 into this car. I'm not asking them to make the car Z06 fast, I'm simply asking for a team to be set up to coax every little bit of speed and handling out of the car, while keeping the car affordable. As the Corvette team keeps making the car progressively better and better by continually tweaking the formula, this is what GM should do with the Cruze SS. Learn how to make a credible threat to the competition, at a competitive price, then keep tweaking the formula as technology progresses. It will assure GM will always be competitive in the segment.

As for a DSG option? Weren't you just talking about making the car too expensive? I'd be completely satisfied with a 5-speed that responds nicely to aftermarket power increases.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2008 | 10:29 PM
  #174  
avro206's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-17-04
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
From: Calgary Alberta Canada
Originally Posted by Gturismo1
Never said anything about making it AWD. I spoke about making it approach that performance benchmark with FWD. This car needs to go toe-to-toe with things like the major competition it its class, drive layout notwithstanding.

I fail to see when I stated any of these apparent numerous things that will be cost prohibitive. Never said AWD. All I am saying is that General Motors should put the same effort as they did into the Z06 into this car. I'm not asking them to make the car Z06 fast, I'm simply asking for a team to be set up to coax every little bit of speed and handling out of the car, while keeping the car affordable. As the Corvette team keeps making the car progressively better and better by continually tweaking the formula, this is what GM should do with the Cruze SS. Learn how to make a credible threat to the competition, at a competitive price, then keep tweaking the formula as technology progresses. It will assure GM will always be competitive in the segment.
Your confusing me greatly----you don't think the TC SS is good enough??

(no you didn't say AWD.....but when you mentioned EVO ect thats where I got it from)

And whats the competition you speak of?? I would not call an EVO/WRX in the same class...way more money and AWD--they are in complately different class.

All they have to to is transfer the running gear/suspension brakes over to the Cruze SS......volia!
(maybe a tad more power)
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2008 | 11:40 PM
  #175  
JRelly's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-27-06
Posts: 6,381
Likes: 1
From: Jacksonville,Florida
Originally Posted by avro206
Your confusing me greatly----you don't think the TC SS is good enough??

(no you didn't say AWD.....but when you mentioned EVO ect thats where I got it from)

And whats the competition you speak of?? I would not call an EVO/WRX in the same class...way more money and AWD--they are in complately different class.

All they have to to is transfer the running gear/suspension brakes over to the Cruze SS......volia!
(maybe a tad more power)
The SS/TC is nowhere near good enough. Don't get me wrong its a great car and performs well but in the sport compact market it lacks in many areas compared to its competition. The EVO and STI are competition for this car. They may be AWD but they are still a sport compact tuner car. It needs more power, interior refinement, quality wheels namely BBS from the factory, Bi-Xenon projector headlights, and many more little things. This car could be right up there with the EVO and STI in the tuner world if they just made a few changes and they wouldn't have to increase price too much. Keep the car under 25k and add those things and it will change the minds of many tuners when it comes to American cars.

Last edited by JRelly; Nov 23, 2008 at 01:27 AM.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:36 AM.