2010+ Future Cruze Discussions Discussions and information related to the upcoming 2010 Chevy Cruze

The 1.4L turbocharged engine finally has a name

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-2010, 04:32 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
riko540's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-02-08
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,860
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Actually guys the artical said the next gen aveo unofficially has run sub 6 second 0-60. I just assumed its the RS seeing as it has the LUJ. But again it doesn't mean that GM hasn't gone and tune or put a different turbo on the LUJ to give it better numbers or put a different engine in seeing as there isn't to much info on the next gen Aveo.
Old 05-28-2010, 04:40 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
redcobalt07's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-06-09
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 5,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
like yes this engine gets better mileage but because they put a turbo on it you have to run premium gas so it kind of nulls the better mileage in terms of saving money. Not to mention the hp rating is just embarrassing.
Old 05-28-2010, 05:28 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
Tomtwtwtw's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-30-06
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 5,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A turbo does not mean it has to run premium. There are plenty of turbo engines out there that don't require it. Being designed as a fuel-sipper, I'm sure this car will run fine on 87.
Old 05-28-2010, 06:02 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
roderick's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-07-08
Location: North Vancouver BC
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by northvibe
dude I bet you can tune these to like 200hp on stock everything then the hotwheels turbo runs out of breath... all you css'ers are so negative
sorry man tunes dont work like that maybe another 25hp thats all.
Old 05-28-2010, 06:23 PM
  #55  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
elecblue06's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-19-07
Location: newburgh,ny
Posts: 14,911
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by roderick
sorry man tunes dont work like that maybe another 25hp thats all.
have you looked at the sstc and the vw market?
Old 05-28-2010, 06:25 PM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
Do_WorkSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-14-09
Location: California
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IMO...its really friggin sad that...even when its turbocharged, it puts down less than 150. once again, thats just my opinion.
Old 05-28-2010, 06:47 PM
  #57  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
northvibe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-07-06
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 14,124
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by roderick
sorry man tunes dont work like that maybe another 25hp thats all.
uhhh did you see what a tune did for lnf?
Old 05-28-2010, 07:05 PM
  #58  
Member
 
piratemosh666's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-19-08
Location: Yates/Carlton - Lyndonville
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, every one of these car companies better start making smaller and more fuel efficient engines quick. Did anyone happen to see that huge hole in the sea floor that BP made, which is spewing ungodly amounts of unrefined crude oil into the Gulf like it's a renewable resource????
Old 05-28-2010, 07:16 PM
  #59  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
riko540's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-02-08
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,860
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Do_WorkSS
IMO...its really friggin sad that...even when its turbocharged, it puts down less than 150. once again, thats just my opinion.
it is sad that it makes less HP than a base model Honda Civic but hopefully the tune is really conservative and will reveal good numbers once HPTuners unlocks the ECM
Old 05-28-2010, 07:28 PM
  #60  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
northvibe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-07-06
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 14,124
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
wtf is your guys issue with it having lower hp? its a 1.4! My vibe had a 1.8l with 130hp at the crank. this isnt suppose to be a ******* race car. its smaller than the cobalt, its suppose to sip gas more than the cobalt. you guys are thinking its like a cobalt ss replacement? theres tiny diesel turbo's with less hp than a honda...SO? turbo doesnt mean InSanE raCe CAr!!1! if you noticed ford is using ecoboost's aka turbo's to enhance fuel economy and make a v6 tt make power like a v8 and a I4 turbo more like a small v6. You guys are totally missing the point of the car/engine.
Old 05-28-2010, 08:10 PM
  #61  
Senior Member
 
Do_WorkSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-14-09
Location: California
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by northvibe
wtf is your guys issue with it having lower hp? its a 1.4! My vibe had a 1.8l with 130hp at the crank. this isnt suppose to be a ******* race car. its smaller than the cobalt, its suppose to sip gas more than the cobalt. you guys are thinking its like a cobalt ss replacement? theres tiny diesel turbo's with less hp than a honda...SO? turbo doesnt mean InSanE raCe CAr!!1! if you noticed ford is using ecoboost's aka turbo's to enhance fuel economy and make a v6 tt make power like a v8 and a I4 turbo more like a small v6. You guys are totally missing the point of the car/engine.
dont go getting your friggin panties in a wad. good god man simmer down. my point was that why waste production money by puttying a turbo on it and it makes **** numbers. just build the motor slightly larger and call it good. and i'd be willing to bet that your vibe wasnt boosted? so your still making more power and your motor was marginally bigger. all im saying is that boosting a 1.4L motor is a compelte waste of money.
Old 05-28-2010, 08:19 PM
  #62  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
riko540's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-02-08
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,860
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Do_WorkSS
dont go getting your friggin panties in a wad. good god man simmer down. my point was that why waste production money by puttying a turbo on it and it makes **** numbers. just build the motor slightly larger and call it good. and i'd be willing to bet that your vibe wasnt boosted? so your still making more power and your motor was marginally bigger. all im saying is that boosting a 1.4L motor is a compelte waste of money.
He is right though its for fuel economy and only time will tell if it is a complete waste of money. I believe GM thinks that slapping a turbo on there will encourage aftermarket support. If the aftermarket support takes off it may help boost sales.
Old 05-28-2010, 08:28 PM
  #63  
Senior Member
 
Do_WorkSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-14-09
Location: California
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by riko540
He is right though its for fuel economy and only time will tell if it is a complete waste of money. I believe GM thinks that slapping a turbo on there will encourage aftermarket support. If the aftermarket support takes off it may help boost sales.
yeah but really in the end, how much aftermarket can you produce for a little tiny itty bitty 1.4L? its not like an exhaust is going to get you 10HP. As for the motor? Again, how much can you build it up to produce before its pointless to spend anymore money? **** im sure you can mod it all you want with all upgrades available and it still wont peak 200HP
Old 05-28-2010, 08:34 PM
  #64  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Dart_SI's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-15-09
Location: kansas
Posts: 7,173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Do_WorkSS
yeah but really in the end, how much aftermarket can you produce for a little tiny itty bitty 1.4L? its not like an exhaust is going to get you 10HP. As for the motor? Again, how much can you build it up to produce before its pointless to spend anymore money? **** im sure you can mod it all you want with all upgrades available and it still wont peak 200HP
ive seen a 700whp d16....
granted its a honda engine but still
anythings possible.
id say depending on internals you could push out 300 with the right turbo set up.
Old 05-28-2010, 08:39 PM
  #65  
Senior Member
 
roderick's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-07-08
Location: North Vancouver BC
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by northvibe
uhhh did you see what a tune did for lnf?
The tune worked for the lnf only because gm had a very crappy tune on the car. Even with the lnf with a custom tune its still slower then most lsj. I dont see a 1.4l car producing 200hp from a tune alone. a 2.0 car producing 300hp with a tune is one thing.
Old 05-28-2010, 09:07 PM
  #66  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Dart_SI's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-15-09
Location: kansas
Posts: 7,173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by roderick
The tune worked for the lnf only because gm had a very crappy tune on the car. Even with the lnf with a custom tune its still slower then most lsj. I dont see a 1.4l car producing 200hp from a tune alone. a 2.0 car producing 300hp with a tune is one thing.
Old 05-28-2010, 09:23 PM
  #67  
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
zrated89's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-01-07
Location: newportnews va
Posts: 4,191
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i find it funny that its going to have a cast iron block kinda weird and heavier than aluminum
Old 05-28-2010, 09:24 PM
  #68  
Senior Member
 
Do_WorkSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-14-09
Location: California
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^^ very good point my friend....
Old 05-28-2010, 09:26 PM
  #69  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Dart_SI's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-15-09
Location: kansas
Posts: 7,173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
has to be a reason behind that
Old 05-28-2010, 09:27 PM
  #70  
Senior Member
 
Do_WorkSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-14-09
Location: California
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the only thing i cant think of is using it for strength purposes due to the small size of the engine and it being boosted.
Old 05-28-2010, 10:47 PM
  #71  
Senior Member
 
dandaman15's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-03-10
Location: West Allis, WI
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I always thought cast iron was cheaper than aluminum. With its added strength and cost effectiveness it probably made more sense. It could also mean they are running more boost to begin with so there is not much more room for improvement beside new turbo. I wonder what type of pistons and rods are going in it.
Old 05-28-2010, 10:51 PM
  #72  
Senior Member
 
rnjmur's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-06-06
Location: O Fallon, MO
Posts: 2,729
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by roderick
The tune worked for the lnf only because gm had a very crappy tune on the car. Even with the lnf with a custom tune its still slower then most lsj. I dont see a 1.4l car producing 200hp from a tune alone. a 2.0 car producing 300hp with a tune is one thing.
Wow. I think you may have that backwards. Even without a tune an LNF is faster than most LSJ. Just because all the LSJ on this site are modded and most of them will keep up with a stock LNF or beat it, does not encompass even near the amount of LSJ that are actually on the road. With a HALF decent tune on an LNF you better be running a TVS or nitrous or else I hate to say it, but you are probably not going to be faster with your LSJ.

I think the Aveo RS will have quite a bit of potential with aftermarket and a tune. I bet there will be no problem pulling out 50 - 60 HP. If you can still average ~35 MPG while doing it, that will be pretty kick ass. True, it will never be a "sports car" or a "race car" but a 2500 lb car with 190HP/200TQ would still be pretty quick and give all the little sub compacts an **** raping without spending $3K or more.
Old 05-29-2010, 01:12 AM
  #73  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
northvibe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-07-06
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 14,124
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Do_WorkSS
dont go getting your friggin panties in a wad. good god man simmer down. my point was that why waste production money by puttying a turbo on it and it makes **** numbers. just build the motor slightly larger and call it good. and i'd be willing to bet that your vibe wasnt boosted? so your still making more power and your motor was marginally bigger. all im saying is that boosting a 1.4L motor is a compelte waste of money.
waste? its not a waste. its a 1.4l!!! with out a turbo it would be at like 90-100hp, with turbo its at what 145hp or so. and gets 40mpg? thats WAY better than whats out their now NA. again this isnt a race car. you guys are all thinking turbo engines = performance. thats not what turbo's are all used for.
Old 05-29-2010, 01:21 AM
  #74  
Senior Member
 
Do_WorkSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-14-09
Location: California
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its like im talking to a friggin kid! i'll break it down as if im talking to a five year old, so try and concentrate. im not saying its a damn race car! what im saying is that IN MY OPINION its a waste to design a turbo'd car that only has 138HP. like i said before, if they're looking for gas milage, bump it up to a 1.8L and scratch the turbo.
Old 05-29-2010, 01:28 AM
  #75  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
northvibe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-07-06
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 14,124
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Do_WorkSS
its like im talking to a friggin kid! i'll break it down as if im talking to a five year old, so try and concentrate. im not saying its a damn race car! what im saying is that IN MY OPINION its a waste to design a turbo'd car that only has 138HP. like i said before, if they're looking for gas milage, bump it up to a 1.8L and scratch the turbo.
no its not. the 1.4 will have lower co2 output and get higher mileage than a 1.8..damn its like im talking to a friggin kid


Quick Reply: The 1.4L turbocharged engine finally has a name



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:42 AM.