Running 10.5:1 pistons
Throw on some ARP Head Studs and a Cometic Head gasket and you could be making some nice numbers with that blower. nothing wrong with higher compression. dont listen to everyone who says higher compression is bad, it isnt if done right. mild boost + higher compression = more power then them =P
Throw on some ARP Head Studs and a Cometic Head gasket and you could be making some nice numbers with that blower. nothing wrong with higher compression. dont listen to everyone who says higher compression is bad, it isnt if done right. mild boost + higher compression = more power then them =P
yea. what he said.. if your goal is boost, instead of performance, then lower ratio is what you want.. ive seen a boosted K20 runnin 11 to 1 ratio makin 350+whp on 13 psi. I guess its just easier turnin up the boost with a lower comp. then fine tuning with the higher comp
You'd also probably want to run richer as well.
You'd be better off going with a more efficient compressor which would yield more power than your supercharger even with higher compression. Another thing to think about, how much air is being delivered into the combustion chamber (talking about your valvetrain) per intake stroke.
Higher octane would be needed as well to avoid knocking.
I think you're really pushing it with that high. Even the J-bodies with the M62 start seeing knocking issues when they reach 3.0" or under.
(Note: The L61 motor is 10.0:1 compression)
Last edited by NJHK; May 18, 2007 at 01:12 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Also understand that you are going to be increasing combustion chamber temperatures by raising the compression. You would also need to fine tune ignition timing depending on how much of an advance it is currently.
you increase this by putting a smaller pulley on too, so I'm sure a 2.5" produces something close to it.
You'd also probably want to run richer as well.
That's no problem, the meth will help here.
You'd be better off going with a more efficient compressor which would yield more power than your supercharger even with higher compression. Another thing to think about, how much air is being delivered into the combustion chamber (talking about your valvetrain) per intake stroke.
Well I can always go TS, but the reason I want to lower the boost on the M62 is because of the efficency, on Eaton's site they don't even have a graph for the stock 12.5psi, so I'm assuming that psi is at it's limit.
since the valve are designed for 9.5:1, I'm assuming there would be plenty of air in and out. I would see this being a problem if I drop the compression.
Higher octane would be needed as well to avoid knocking.
Even in vacuum?
I think you're really pushing it with that high. Even the J-bodies with the M62 start seeing knocking issues when they reach 3.0" or under.
(Note: The L61 motor is 10.0:1 compression)
you increase this by putting a smaller pulley on too, so I'm sure a 2.5" produces something close to it.
You'd also probably want to run richer as well.
That's no problem, the meth will help here.
You'd be better off going with a more efficient compressor which would yield more power than your supercharger even with higher compression. Another thing to think about, how much air is being delivered into the combustion chamber (talking about your valvetrain) per intake stroke.
Well I can always go TS, but the reason I want to lower the boost on the M62 is because of the efficency, on Eaton's site they don't even have a graph for the stock 12.5psi, so I'm assuming that psi is at it's limit.
since the valve are designed for 9.5:1, I'm assuming there would be plenty of air in and out. I would see this being a problem if I drop the compression.
Higher octane would be needed as well to avoid knocking.
Even in vacuum?
I think you're really pushing it with that high. Even the J-bodies with the M62 start seeing knocking issues when they reach 3.0" or under.
(Note: The L61 motor is 10.0:1 compression)
What's going on with his car anyways?
Last edited by Mase; May 18, 2007 at 03:00 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Mase, if you care about efficiency and you recognize that raising the compression (just for example sakes) will put you in the temperature range of a 2.5" pulley, why go this route? Less boost or more boost, it's overall about the temperature inside the combustion chamber.
You actually COULD knock in vacuum or with very low boost pressure.
As far as running rich, remember the whole issue with having a return-less fuel system...
One last thing
If you have to use Meth Injection on a constant basis to keep temps down, there IS a problem. It should be a helper, not a must have.
You actually COULD knock in vacuum or with very low boost pressure.
As far as running rich, remember the whole issue with having a return-less fuel system...
One last thing
If you have to use Meth Injection on a constant basis to keep temps down, there IS a problem. It should be a helper, not a must have.
Last edited by NJHK; May 18, 2007 at 08:18 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
I know what you're saying about heat inside the motor.
One of the main reasons I want to go with 10.5:1 is due to the 2.4L. The solstice I tuned made 311RWHP at only 8psi. Now I know they have more displacement, but in comparison to the turbo cobalt which made 323WHP at the front on 18psi, I'm thinking these motors like compression more than boost.
One of the main reasons I want to go with 10.5:1 is due to the 2.4L. The solstice I tuned made 311RWHP at only 8psi. Now I know they have more displacement, but in comparison to the turbo cobalt which made 323WHP at the front on 18psi, I'm thinking these motors like compression more than boost.
I know what you're saying about heat inside the motor.
One of the main reasons I want to go with 10.5:1 is due to the 2.4L. The solstice I tuned made 311RWHP at only 8psi. Now I know they have more displacement, but in comparison to the turbo cobalt which made 323WHP at the front on 18psi, I'm thinking these motors like compression more than boost.
One of the main reasons I want to go with 10.5:1 is due to the 2.4L. The solstice I tuned made 311RWHP at only 8psi. Now I know they have more displacement, but in comparison to the turbo cobalt which made 323WHP at the front on 18psi, I'm thinking these motors like compression more than boost.
You're comparing a Turbocharged Unit to your Supercharger unit. Even with your supercharger staying within it's efficiency range, it does not compare to a properly sized turbocharger as far as how much air (CFM) is being produced AND the parasitic loss that you're having when it comes to turning the supercharger. Displacement defenitley does play an effect as well...there is a slight bore increase over your engine but it's mostly the stroke that's the difference, this means more air and higher VE.
It's hard to really compare 2 setups and try to say that they are slightly similar because even if it was the same engine as yours, you're not going to duplicate it's results.
People that are running higher comp pistons are doing so because of aggressive cams.
My cams are going to be far past aggressive, more like, "WHAT? Your actually gonna drive that on the street!?!?"
9.5:1 compression FTMFW!!! 15 psi with a 2.6" pulley FTMFW!!!! Boost/Heat equal to a 2.9" pulley, but the CFM of a 2.6", can't beat that!
Adding compression and lowering boost will grant you the same power as when you had higher boost and lower compression. The benefits are that your spinning the SC slower which = less parasitic loss, and the roots type you use is less and less efficient the faster you spin it. Turbo's its cool to lower comp, but roots type equipped cars love comp.
10.5 is damn high btw
10.5 is damn high btw
Tell me, was the head of the attack on you by chance AlphaJaguar? He TRIED to blast me when I posted about my blower porting! He blasts everyone, and says he has 300 whp with no dyno to prove it.
One of the reasons why i came over here. Lots of knowledgeable people here.
I bought 10:5:1 pistons which Rob Archer told me he was going to do before he had to get rid of the car. Now after reading everything and I talked to Todd at Intense I don't know if I want them anymore. Should I sell them or give them a try? I really don't want to run 100 octane. I run only 94 now so I don't really want to go above that. Any advice would be appreciated.


