ADVANCED Performance Modifications For advanced modification topics only.

TB upgrade for the balt?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 06:32 PM
  #1  
rrutter81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 05-11-07
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
TB upgrade for the balt?

Just curious where our bottlenecks are via airflow in the ecotec. Any info on this would be appreciated. I only brought up throttlebody because some of the ecotec cavaliers have noticed a few hp gains from them. Normally asperated im not sure...
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 06:34 PM
  #2  
chevysalesman614's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-03-06
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 0
From: new jersey
what eco are you talking about? LSJ, LE9, LNF, ect....
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 06:40 PM
  #3  
rrutter81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 05-11-07
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by chevysalesman614
what eco are you talking about? LSJ, LE9, LNF, ect....
Eh srry, i have an ss/sc so the LSJ which im thinking is around 60-61 mm?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 07:27 PM
  #4  
AWDstylez's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-06-07
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: CT
You aren't bottle necking at a 60mm TB at <300hp.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 07:38 PM
  #5  
rrutter81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 05-11-07
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by AWDstylez
You aren't bottle necking at a 60mm TB at <300hp.
our tb can withstand 10000000000000000 hp....whats ur point?

Someone who knows anything about our psi and bottlenecks in our engine via airflow pls.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 07:42 PM
  #6  
AWDstylez's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-06-07
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: CT
I just told you, you aren't maxing out a 60mm throttle body at <300hp. There cars making 400+hp on 60mm TB. Spend your money in other places, the TB isn't going to be a restriction for you for a long long time.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 07:46 PM
  #7  
rrutter81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 05-11-07
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by AWDstylez
I just told you, you aren't maxing out a 60mm throttle body at <300hp. There cars making 400+hp on 60mm TB. Spend your money in other places, the TB isn't going to be a restriction for you for a long long time.
No one is maxxing out their exhaust manifolds either....that doesnt mean we dont want more airflow.

18 PSI is telling me there is a bottleneck.....
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 07:49 PM
  #8  
AWDstylez's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-06-07
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: CT
You're missing the point you could bolt on a 110mm TB and you wouldn't gain even 1/4hp because you aren't anywhere near the limits of a 60mm one. The only thing you'll do is turn 60% throttle and 100% throttle into the same thing because the TB is oversized for the power you're making.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 07:50 PM
  #9  
rrutter81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 05-11-07
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by AWDstylez
You're missing the point you could bolt on a 110mm TB and you wouldn't gain even 1/4hp because you aren't anywhere near the limits of a 60mm one.
however you would have less restriction and less psi, heat, wear and tear.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 07:53 PM
  #10  
AWDstylez's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-06-07
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: CT
ugh... It's just not worth it.

Have a ball, throw a 200mm on there. I bet that will drop charge temps into the sub zero range it will have so little restriction.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 07:55 PM
  #11  
rrutter81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 05-11-07
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by AWDstylez
ugh... It's just not worth it.

Have a ball, throw a 200mm on there. I bet that will drop charge temps into the sub zero range it will have so little restriction.
lmfao
Being serious though, I wouldnt mind 75 mm at the butterfly.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 08:03 PM
  #12  
AWDstylez's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-06-07
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: CT
You'd gain 0.00hp and would nothing but make throttle angle to air let in relationship more aggresive. And that results in nothing more than what I just said, making 60-80% throttle the same as WOT. At 300hp you're engine can't pull enough air for the 60mm to be a restricition, you aren't helping anything by making that inlet bigger.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 08:07 PM
  #13  
rrutter81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 05-11-07
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by AWDstylez
You'd gain 0.00hp and would nothing but make throttle angle to air let in relationship more aggresive. And that results in nothing more than what I just said, making 60-80% throttle the same as WOT. At 300hp you're engine can't pull enough air for the 60mm to be a restricition, you aren't helping anything by making that inlet bigger.
Obviously when I see 18 psi it means im using it all and its not wasted air....its actually accomodated. yes i see clearly now

your one of those kids who thinks more boost = more hp?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 08:17 PM
  #14  
AWDstylez's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-06-07
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: CT
Say wha bro? That didn't even make any sense.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 08:21 PM
  #15  
rrutter81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 05-11-07
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by AWDstylez
Say wha bro? That didn't even make any sense.
I really dont want to flame you.....

seriously your making this rough......
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 08:26 PM
  #16  
AWDstylez's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-06-07
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: CT
It's simple. At 300hp (which is what the highest power blower guys are making) a 60mm TB is more than adequate.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 08:27 PM
  #17  
elvisc's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 09-28-06
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Providence, RI
the problem with running a huge ass TB is drivability.

cause you can easily go from vacuum to atmosphere easily.

but with FI it's easier to get by with a smaller tb since it's forced.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 08:41 PM
  #18  
rrutter81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 05-11-07
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by elvisc
the problem with running a huge ass TB is drivability.

cause you can easily go from vacuum to atmosphere easily.

but with FI it's easier to get by with a smaller tb since it's forced.
Not going to go huge, just larger... ie: us using 3 inch exhaust instead of stock, however ive heard the same thing about that. I find it very difficult for it going atmosphere very easily with forced induction.

If thats the conclusion Ill go with it, however I'll wait for more opinions on it.

Originally Posted by AWDstylez
It's simple. At 300hp (which is what the highest power blower guys are making) a 60mm TB is more than adequate.
dude... our blower doesnt make 300 hp. Our stock internals support it max (if you believe GM).

Im not worried about my TB exploding.

Last edited by rrutter81; Jul 24, 2007 at 08:41 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 11:17 PM
  #19  
rrutter81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 05-11-07
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by yourmother
So then why are you concerned with upgrading your TB. That's like wanting to buy axles that support 900hp when you're only making 230hp.
If you are only answering this post in response to TB and horsepower just dont even respond. If, however you are responding via CFM, PSI reduction etc let me know.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 11:27 PM
  #20  
NJHK's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-05-06
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 2
From: East Brunswick, NJ
OMG I can't believe this thread is going on...

First of all, you have a LSJ with a supercharger that creates or better word "builds" pressure in the manifold. I don't know why you keep mentioning "18 PSI" when this is POST-throttle body.

Another thing, pre-throttle body, you're still following the basic principal of air intake velocity. Making the hole bigger isn't going to make air come in any faster, it will just slow it down. If you were shoving in a MASSIVE quantity of air with a LARGE turbocharger then this would be a different story because that would all be done PRE-throttle body.

So AWDStyles is absolutely correct, it's a worthless upgrade.

Also, just cause the J-body guys picked up a "couple of HP" doesn't mean it was at all a bottleneck. For all you know, they shifted their powerband upwards, gained 2-3 HP and lossed 5 lbs of torque in the lower portion of the powerband from the change with air intake velocity.

Your throttle body is FAR from being a bottleneck.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 11:43 PM
  #21  
rrutter81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 05-11-07
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by NJHK
OMG I can't believe this thread is going on...
once again you offer nothing to it...suprise? flame on!



Originally Posted by NJHK
First of all, you have a LSJ with a supercharger that creates or better word "builds" pressure in the manifold. I don't know why you keep mentioning "18 PSI" when this is POST-throttle body. .
k .... so is this
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/forced-induction-50/what-20psi-does-plastic-intake-manifold-54808/


Originally Posted by NJHK
Another thing, pre-throttle body, you're still following the basic principal of air intake velocity. Making the hole bigger isn't going to make air come in any faster, it will just slow it down. If you were shoving in a MASSIVE quantity of air with a LARGE turbocharger then this would be a different story because that would all be done PRE-throttle body.
your almost right....not quite tho

It makes the compressed air go in faster...yes, not the total air molecules itself which is detonated. Saying it will go slower is like comparing you sucking on a straw and then with the same amount of pressure with a 3 inch pipe. Same air is coming in, just not at the same "velocity" and density. Why do people want 3' CAI? I know....why dont you hook up a 1' CAI and tell me why that fast air is making you lose hp?

keep it constructive
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 11:46 PM
  #22  
Belto's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-21-06
Posts: 2,124
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Florida
dude,, you already have your mind set on buying a bigger TB so why ask us for any advice if your not willing to hear our opinions... ? and also NJHK is one of the most knowledgefull people here, so I would hear him out when he advices you something.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 11:51 PM
  #23  
rrutter81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 05-11-07
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by Belto
also NJHK is one of the most knowledgefull people here, so I would hear him out when he advices you something.
He mentioned it was post throttlebody....that was the only piece that deterred my tb question as not a big deal. The rest was fluff.....as usual
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 11:52 PM
  #24  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
Originally Posted by rrutter81
He mentioned it was post throttlebody....that was the only piece that deterred my tb question as not a big deal. The rest was fluff.....as usual
what was fluff? you just don't want to accept the fact that it won't do anything for you. why are you so set on a bigger tb?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 11:57 PM
  #25  
rrutter81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 05-11-07
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
what was fluff? you just don't want to accept the fact that it won't do anything for you. why are you so set on a bigger tb?
I was looking at it as "part of" an option for increasing air flow overall. Boost your car to mars, id rather sit at 15 psi but with maxed amount of air.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:58 PM.