ADVANCED Performance Modifications For advanced modification topics only.

TB upgrade for the balt?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-25-2007, 12:24 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
NJHK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-05-06
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by rrutter81
once again you offer nothing to it...suprise? flame on!





k .... so is this
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/forced-induction-50/what-20psi-does-plastic-intake-manifold-54808/




your almost right....not quite tho

It makes the compressed air go in faster...yes, not the total air molecules itself which is detonated. Saying it will go slower is like comparing you sucking on a straw and then with the same amount of pressure with a 3 inch pipe. Same air is coming in, just not at the same "velocity" and density. Why do people want 3' CAI? I know....why dont you hook up a 1' CAI and tell me why that fast air is making you lose hp?

keep it constructive
There is a different between air velocity and air capacity and balancing between the two. Why don't you ask me why people don't get 1" exhaust systems. It's the same theory.

Yes, the supercharger can make a draw for air but to the point of utilizing and even being able to supply the supercharger that same velocity of airflow and a larger capacity with a 70 MM throttle body is not going to happen.

And also once again, you can only compress so much air and you can only draw in so much air when the valves open. Yes, you're creating 18 PSI of pressure in your manifold but how much of that pressurized air is being utilized, that's a different story.

Seriously, why don't you just do it and stop wasting our times. You come on a forum and ask a question, someone gives you a answer and you disagree like you know what you are talking about and you will argue your point left and right...just ******* do it. Who cares what we think cause evidentally you DON'T.

Originally Posted by Belto
dude,, you already have your mind set on buying a bigger TB so why ask us for any advice if your not willing to hear our opinions... ? and also NJHK is one of the most knowledgefull people here, so I would hear him out when he advices you something.
Exactly!

And thank you.

I don't understand this thread at all.

Originally Posted by reggin
That made NO sense.

This kid is on drugs.
ROFL

Last edited by NJHK; 07-25-2007 at 12:26 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 07-25-2007, 12:32 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
NJHK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-05-06
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by reggin
He lacks a basic understanding airflow, boost, and power output. He's failing to realize that if you can pull 400hp worth of air through a 60mm hole with 0 pressure drop, then it simply isn't a restriction and enlarging that to a 1000000mm opening isn't going to flow any more air.

Restriction has to do with pressure drops. If there is not pressure drop across the TB, it isn't a restriction. End of story.
BINGO!

It's like these people so quick to trash their intake manifold for something "larger" when it's far from being a restriction.
Old 07-25-2007, 12:36 AM
  #28  
Banned
 
3fo893013L's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-30-05
Posts: 6,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You want restriction, perhaps you should be looking at the stock LSJ heads first. TB is a last thing to upgrade. Even a fully ported Stage 3 Ecotec head cannot flow faster then an stock EVO head. The head is pretty restrictive piece IMO, so is the crappy LSJ exhaust manifold design. The rest of the exhaust outflow the header so imagine that restriction..

All that larger TB will do is make the air dance around the inlet. Also, good luck tuning the extra coming in. The momment you put that TB on without it tuned it will throw it in limp mode because it cannot read all the extra air.
Old 07-25-2007, 12:40 AM
  #29  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
rrutter81's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-11-07
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
reformed comment....done with this
Old 07-25-2007, 12:42 AM
  #30  
Banned
 
3fo893013L's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-30-05
Posts: 6,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rrutter81
reformed comment....done with this
WTF?
Old 07-25-2007, 12:44 AM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
NJHK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-05-06
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by sneaky
You want restriction, perhaps you should be looking at the stock LSJ heads first. TB is a last thing to upgrade. Even a fully ported Stage 3 Ecotec head cannot flow faster then an stock EVO head. The head is pretty restrictive piece IMO, so is the crappy LSJ exhaust manifold design. The rest of the exhaust outflow the header so imagine that restriction..

All that larger TB will do is make the air dance around the inlet. Also, good luck tuning the extra coming in. The momment you put that TB on without it tuned it will throw it in limp mode because it cannot read all the extra air.
I agree and disagree...sort of.

I agree the TB is the last thing that should be changed. I also agree that the head is restrictive BUT I will say it depends on the purpose of the vehicle as far as powerband and RPM band as well. Honda cylinder heads are known for being high in CFM flowing capabilities but they are also revving 8k and sometimes higher.

Originally Posted by sneaky
WTF?
That means that we win...

WE WIN! WEEEE!

Last edited by NJHK; 07-25-2007 at 12:44 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 07-25-2007, 12:46 AM
  #32  
Banned
 
3fo893013L's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-30-05
Posts: 6,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've looked at flow charts before for the ecotec head, it's sub-par compared to the rest of the competiion even with some work done to it, although I do agree it's better then some.
Old 07-25-2007, 12:46 AM
  #33  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
rrutter81's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-11-07
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sneaky
WTF?
responded to a comment then just deleted it.

PSI is built for a reason, restriction occur with PSI. You cant say the engine doesnt have restrictions. The tb was only a question but when idiots come on here and mention HP and not CFM, Pressure and other things it just ticks me off. Cylinder Heads will need a port and polish I know, and I know the MAF from and oversized tb wont read correctly without a tune as well.
Bottlenecks I was talking about were with flowing more air through larger space. Not how much that space can hold via pressure, density, and heat.
Old 07-25-2007, 12:47 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
NJHK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-05-06
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by reggin
Why does everyone always say that, aren't these cars mass flow based?
Si Senior.
Old 07-25-2007, 12:47 AM
  #35  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
rrutter81's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-11-07
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by reggin
Why does everyone always say that, aren't these cars mass flow based?
it can read the air....it just needs a tune
Old 07-25-2007, 12:49 AM
  #36  
Banned
 
3fo893013L's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-30-05
Posts: 6,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I take it your using a TB off a Colorado/Caynon and fabbing it to your supercharger?
Old 07-25-2007, 12:51 AM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
NJHK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-05-06
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by rrutter81
responded to a comment then just deleted it.

PSI is built for a reason, restriction occur with PSI. You cant say the engine doesnt have restrictions. The tb was only a question but when idiots come on here and mention HP and not CFM, Pressure and other things it just ticks me off. Cylinder Heads will need a port and polish I know, and I know the MAF from and oversized tb wont read correctly without a tune as well.
Bottlenecks I was talking about were with flowing more air through larger space. Not how much that space can hold via pressure, density, and heat.
No one did.

All of our comments were mentioning towards your "70 MM Throttle Body" comment.

Originally Posted by sneaky
I take it your using a TB off a Colorado/Caynon and fabbing it to your supercharger?
OH NOEZ! U LT DA S3KR3TZ OUT!1111111

Last edited by NJHK; 07-25-2007 at 12:51 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 07-25-2007, 12:51 AM
  #38  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
rrutter81's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-11-07
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NJHK
No one did.

All of our comments were mentioning towards your "70 MM Throttle Body" comment.
My original post was about any restrictions in general. Then some idiot went on a rant measuring TB with HP rating which is like giving 93 octane an HP rating. Going to bed
Old 07-25-2007, 01:02 AM
  #39  
Banned
 
3fo893013L's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-30-05
Posts: 6,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by reggin
So why do I see people all over the place saying that they always need to be retuned with even the slightest modification? Normal MAF based cars have a fairly large margin of reading range over stock power.
Are MAF sucks. It's the most pickest sensor on any vehicle i've ever seen. Thats why since it's so sensative we constantly have to make changes to counter or adjust what it cannot compensate. Even throwing an intake on the car makes it wig the hell out.
Old 07-25-2007, 01:09 AM
  #40  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
ItalianJoe1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-05
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 12,485
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 60 Posts
Originally Posted by sneaky
I take it your using a TB off a Colorado/Caynon and fabbing it to your supercharger?
No fabbing required, it bolts and plugs right in. Only need a new coupler for the intake. I put one on my car just to try it, it idled ok and responded fast as hell, but over about 20% throttle opening you got limp mode. Something for me to play with when I get HPT.
Old 07-25-2007, 02:48 AM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
NJHK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-05-06
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by rrutter81
My original post was about any restrictions in general. Then some idiot went on a rant measuring TB with HP rating which is like giving 93 octane an HP rating. Going to bed
You know what...you're right.

I apologize, I think I took it as you initially asking about TB changes.
Old 04-24-2008, 04:50 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
freakta's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-22-07
Location: milton ma
Posts: 5,578
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so why does raw say it gains 10hp
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
06MetallicBalt
Mid East
9
08-17-2021 03:40 PM
Zharrington_2010LNF
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
21
02-08-2016 01:43 PM
Tupp
2.2L LAP Performance Tech
5
01-02-2016 12:04 PM
dieGone
Complete Cars
0
10-01-2015 06:27 PM
roth
Problems/Service/Maintenance
2
09-26-2015 12:16 PM



Quick Reply: TB upgrade for the balt?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:11 PM.