and '09 2.2L trims are LS, 1LT (LS bumper), 2LT (SS/NA bumper)

 

i'm actually an owner of many different vehicle makes but my newest is definitely a honda.

 

well yeah but the 2.2 was never anything more than an ls/lt car in the cobalt lineup so its kinda obvious its not gonna be an ss car hahah

 

Point?

 

New Si shifters are god-like. My stepdad sells Hondas and wanted me to drive the Si. I loved the interior since its leaps and bounds better than my LS with nothing powered. But the shift throws were like sex lol.

At the end of the day I wanna pay off my car and not get a torque-less wonder and go further into debt.

 

I have no problem with hondas as long as they are kept clean, I just felt like giving you a hard time, ..mainly because your a mod

 

he kept complaining about certain badges being on certain cars. so i just thought i'ld post that up. lol

go get your license....

 

True, but some may do some crazy-ass turbo and push more power than a base 2.4 and 2.0 SC output and might call it an SS. I think in my opinion, if someone does that then they deserve to have an SS badge. Now, if someone just slaps an SS on a 2.2 with walmart hubcaps we got a problem. I know after I do my cams and ****, I'll be about 170ish I hope, will I call the car an SS? Never, because I like making people ask "is that an SS?"

 

haven't had the chance to drive the new Si's so i'll take your word on the shifter. my TL is a sport shift so don't get much excitement or feel of the knob.

 

LE5 is bored out a bit more, it's 88x98.



Right from teh General.

 

oh ok...


go get a better time slip.....

 

Its real nice, now granted I still need to be 100% comfy with using a manual and I have an auto. But since at work I deal with Cobalts and inventory all day the throws on a new turbo are long compared to the Si.

 

theres a big difference between this....and a cc08 style fuel door cover....

 

no. if your car was built in a non ss trim. it shall forever be in a non ss trim, no matter how much power you have.

ballard and whitfield are both running 2.16's with a little over 900whp, both running low/mid 9's....and they don't call their car an ss, and no one ever has.

atleast i'm able to get a time slip in the first place.

 

Holy ****, ask and you shall receive........General's Fried Chicken, its butt-kicking. Damn undercover brother.

 

interesting, i got mine off the tuner source website and the build book. oh well who cares

 

Agreed.

Just like my ESI has more power than a TSI but im not gonna throw a TSI badge on it.

If i had an ls with 500hp id keep the ls badge just for the lolz when people think "oh its just an ls i can take it"

 

::3 year old voice::
Sooo!!

 

...what I'm shooting for, minus the 500HP part

 

i'm a huge ricer so you probably won't like my last two cars.

06 TL: https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/pictures-videos-64/so-i-no-longer-own-rsx-27758/

04 RSX-S: https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/show...hlight=hondata

 

http://tunersource.gmblogs.com/Racer...ofessional.pdf
page 5....if you really wanna get technical lol. i really couldn't care less the specs of an engine i don't have. i was pointing out the differences of the engines to whoever was asking about them before

that rsx is actually quite nice

 

I like the rsx!

The TL has a classy look

 

i made another mod on here kiss my my front honda emblem after beating him in a race. won't say any names but he did have a ss/sc.

 

hahahah

 

thanks. wish i would have waited on purchasing the TL. the year after i got mine the type S came out for it.