the best pass to date for my cobalt
Yea I'm not really looking to grind anything. 245 is pretty damn big.
I did find a 245/50/16 but that just seems like allot of tire to get me through 1st and then slow me down the rest of the way.
I did find a 245/50/16 but that just seems like allot of tire to get me through 1st and then slow me down the rest of the way.
Last edited by RBC; Feb 3, 2008 at 08:11 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
where are you getting 27 from? i said close to 100, thats 108-110. which is 25-27 mph. seeing as how he only needs to pick up 11 mph from the 1000 on, which i could show you is quite possible in either of our cars.
quit being a hater and support a fast car. care to tell me how many cobalts you see putting down et's like his in the 1/8 and 1000, and thats with a 2.00 60. think it might be making some power?
quit being a hater and support a fast car. care to tell me how many cobalts you see putting down et's like his in the 1/8 and 1000, and thats with a 2.00 60. think it might be making some power?
Originally Posted by hatrickstu
hes saying with a 2.0. i have one with a 2.29 that went 79 in the 1/8 and 105 in the 1/4.
you know there will always be that hater that disbelieves everything, you have to have the slip, video of run, pictures at the 1/8 and 1/4, 3 witnesses, a state trooper, and his mom has to be there in order for it to be true.
you know there will always be that hater that disbelieves everything, you have to have the slip, video of run, pictures at the 1/8 and 1/4, 3 witnesses, a state trooper, and his mom has to be there in order for it to be true.
Basic math. He trapped 83mph in the 1/8 and you are saying he will trap 110mph in the 1/4. I don't know about Arkansas math but 110-83= 27.
Where am I being a hater??? I am just stating facts. His car is not going to do 83 in the 1/8 and 110 in the 1/4.
500+hp 11 second cars don't gain 27 in the back half.
And NO DUH you picked up more mph in the back half with a WORSE 60'. Do you have any idea as to what you are babbling about?
Like I said before show me another Cobalt pull a 2.0 60' and pick up 27mph on the back half.
PS quit with the childish insults
Last edited by balla; Feb 4, 2008 at 01:57 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost


Nice times 06
Do u know what ur babbling about . Here slips from my 95 Trans Am . I posted 4 , I got several more . Kinda blows ur theory there bud . It all depends where the car pulls the best . My Trans AM was pulled like a freight train from 5K-7200 and it was not impressive power wise below 4K ( look at my dead hooking 60 ft times
) My Cobalt is the same way , though the most Ive gained with it in back 1/2 is 23 mph < that is with the stock pulley though
.
Nice times 06
. . . I cant wait to start drag racing again this year .
Nice times 06
Still would love to see a Cobalt cut a 2.0 60' and pick up 27mph on the back 1/2 with under 300whp.
well the reason i can pick up so much in the back half is that, like stu said i pull very hard in third. and there is a huge difference between Drs and slicks. people running slicks cutting 2.0s or better have a hell of alot less pressure than my Drs which are just shy of 20 psi cold. thats why you wont gain as much later you sacrifice top speed for launch with slicks which is somewhat true with drs but not as bad. and hell between the 1/8th and the 1000 ft mark i gained 14 mph what makes it so hard to beleive another 10 in the next 320 ft still in 3rd gear?
Originally Posted by balla
500+hp 11 second cars don't gain 27 in the back half
well the reason i can pick up so much in the back half is that, like stu said i pull very hard in third. and there is a huge difference between Drs and slicks. people running slicks cutting 2.0s or better have a hell of alot less pressure than my Drs which are just shy of 20 psi cold. thats why you wont gain as much later you sacrifice top speed for launch with slicks which is somewhat true with drs but not as bad. and hell between the 1/8th and the 1000 ft mark i gained 14 mph what makes it so hard to beleive another 10 in the next 320 ft still in 3rd gear?
But please prove me wrong instead of having Stewie insult me.
The way u worded sounded like u meant them all
No clue on the power of my TA , it wasnt ever on a dyno . I just tuned it with a wideband and LT1 edit and left it at that . The car 3700 lbs ( convertible) and the best et 11.69@119 ....a calculator says 474 at the wheels and 590 crank ...Im sure those are reeeeeal accurate 
Nice car and times either way.
My main point though still is 27mph on the back half is no easy feet and stu and black are acting like they will do it without any trouble and still cut decent 60's.
Last edited by balla; Feb 4, 2008 at 03:42 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Basic math. He trapped 83mph in the 1/8 and you are saying he will trap 110mph in the 1/4. I don't know about Arkansas math but 110-83= 27.
Where am I being a hater??? I am just stating facts. His car is not going to do 83 in the 1/8 and 110 in the 1/4.
500+hp 11 second cars don't gain 27 in the back half.
And NO DUH you picked up more mph in the back half with a WORSE 60'. Do you have any idea as to what you are babbling about?
Like I said before show me another Cobalt pull a 2.0 60' and pick up 27mph on the back half.
PS quit with the childish insults
Where am I being a hater??? I am just stating facts. His car is not going to do 83 in the 1/8 and 110 in the 1/4.
500+hp 11 second cars don't gain 27 in the back half.
And NO DUH you picked up more mph in the back half with a WORSE 60'. Do you have any idea as to what you are babbling about?
Like I said before show me another Cobalt pull a 2.0 60' and pick up 27mph on the back half.
PS quit with the childish insults
thats common sense, if a car is going 95 or so in the 1/8 its traveling much faster across that remaining 660 feet THUS ITS HARDER TO PICK UP THAT MUCH MPH. and just for ***** and giggles i went and looked on some forums with plenty of 500 or close to 500 hp cars (vette forums mostly) and almost all of them running in the 11-10 second range pick up 26-28 mph on the back half ON SLICKS.
thanks man, glad someone else can see the light!
Last edited by hatrickstu; Feb 4, 2008 at 01:44 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
basic englsih, i said close to 110. there goes your whole argument. oh really 500 hp cars dont pick up that much on the backhalf, did you ever consider thats because they are already going so much faster????
thats common sense, if a car is going 95 or so in the 1/8 its traveling much faster across that remaining 660 feet THUS ITS HARDER TO PICK UP THAT MUCH MPH. and just for ***** and giggles i went and looked on some forums with plenty of 500 or close to 500 hp cars (vette forums mostly) and almost all of them running in the 11-10 second range pick up 26-28 mph on the back half ON SLICKS.
thanks man, glad someone else can see the light!
thats common sense, if a car is going 95 or so in the 1/8 its traveling much faster across that remaining 660 feet THUS ITS HARDER TO PICK UP THAT MUCH MPH. and just for ***** and giggles i went and looked on some forums with plenty of 500 or close to 500 hp cars (vette forums mostly) and almost all of them running in the 11-10 second range pick up 26-28 mph on the back half ON SLICKS.
thanks man, glad someone else can see the light!
You still said 110. I don't see him trapping over 109 with a 2.0 60'. There are GTOs(a little closer to Cobalt's aero) with 85ish 1/8 mile traps that don't pick up 27mph by the 1/4 and they run 11s.
Still waiting for you to prove me wrong, one Cobalt pick up 27mph with a 2.0 60' or even 26mph. Until then STFU!
Ummm I may be wrong but aren't vettes a little more aerodynamic than Cobalts?
You still said 110. I don't see him trapping over 109 with a 2.0 60'. There are GTOs(a little closer to Cobalt's aero) with 85ish 1/8 mile traps that don't pick up 27mph by the 1/4 and they run 11s.
Still waiting for you to prove me wrong, one Cobalt pick up 27mph with a 2.0 60' or even 26mph. Until then STFU!
You still said 110. I don't see him trapping over 109 with a 2.0 60'. There are GTOs(a little closer to Cobalt's aero) with 85ish 1/8 mile traps that don't pick up 27mph by the 1/4 and they run 11s.
Still waiting for you to prove me wrong, one Cobalt pick up 27mph with a 2.0 60' or even 26mph. Until then STFU!
if you want to pick apart, and misunderstand the english language then you let me know, until then STFU with your negativity.
there are GTO's trapping 85 in the 1/8 and running 11's?!?!?!? LMAO, you really are a moron. where you getting that info from????
http://www.ls1gto.com/forums/showthread.php?t=216145
http://www.ls1gto.com/forums/showthread.php?t=106613
none of the cars on THEIR official list trapped below like 88 anywhere below about a 12.5. uber pwnage there. AND almost all the cars on that list were in the 25+ MPH area between the 1/8 and 1/4
damn your a *******, i just said, and originally said "CLOSE TO 110" and you say thats not possible. THEN, your intelligent ass says "I don't see him trapping over 109," pretty sure when i say close to 110, 109 falls into that category!
if you want to pick apart, and misunderstand the english language then you let me know, until then STFU with your negativity.
there are GTO's trapping 85 in the 1/8 and running 11's?!?!?!? LMAO, you really are a moron. where you getting that info from????
http://www.ls1gto.com/forums/showthread.php?t=216145
http://www.ls1gto.com/forums/showthread.php?t=106613
none of the cars on THEIR official list trapped below like 88 anywhere below about a 12.5. uber pwnage there. AND almost all the cars on that list were in the 25+ MPH area between the 1/8 and 1/4
if you want to pick apart, and misunderstand the english language then you let me know, until then STFU with your negativity.
there are GTO's trapping 85 in the 1/8 and running 11's?!?!?!? LMAO, you really are a moron. where you getting that info from????
http://www.ls1gto.com/forums/showthread.php?t=216145
http://www.ls1gto.com/forums/showthread.php?t=106613
none of the cars on THEIR official list trapped below like 88 anywhere below about a 12.5. uber pwnage there. AND almost all the cars on that list were in the 25+ MPH area between the 1/8 and 1/4
Are you retarded??
Point blank, show me Cobalt cut a 2.0 60' and pick up 27mph in the back half?
point blank, all of your points have been proven wrong. you are just waiting for something i have no access too. i said "close to 110," you say thats not possible, but 109 is. terrible argument, as were all your others.
Please prove me wrong.
Show me a Cobalt cut a 2.0, trap 83 in the 1/8, and "trap close to 110" in the 1/4 then.


