Drag Racing Kindle Racing and Dalcorp Racing

the best pass to date for my cobalt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 04:56 PM
  #101  
laloosh's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-24-07
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey
Originally Posted by hatrickstu
wow laloosh, lame completely copying someone elses response off an identical argument.

and i disagree with the other guy's argument anyways, nice plagiarism though.

and your example is too extreme to fit the argument. we are not talking about spinning over the whole track or even half of it, we are talking in small incrementals, which will increase your wheel speed enough to increase the trap OVER a longer period of time (NOT distance)

http://www.mazdas247.com/forum/showp...5&postcount=20

^^^lame
look who started that thread before u call it lame, i just had this discussion, whats the point of typing up what i want to say when i can just copy it.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 04:58 PM
  #102  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by laloosh
look who started that thread before u call it lame, i just had this discussion, whats the point of typing up what i want to say when i can just copy it.
because it proves you dont know what you are talking about, you are just repeating what you read and ASSUME is correct. it proves you have no grip on the actual concept

this is a difficult thing to argue over the internet, but i will try to help you understand if you are willing to swallow some pride. the guy whos answer you used it actually incorrect in saying distance is not increased. think about it, of course you are still ACTUALLY traveling 1320 feet, but THEORETICALLY your TIRES are traveling a further distance. if your tires travel 1320 feet with no spin, and they rotate a couple times your tires are now covering more distance over a longer period of time. i understand its hard to grasp and it is quite hard to explain. you cant look at extremes to explain this because obviously excessive tire spin will kill your run all together, but MODERATE tire spin WILL increase trap speed and ET. its been proved time and time again, so dont think you have magically come across some reasoning that genius drag racers have never come across before
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:03 PM
  #103  
laloosh's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-24-07
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey
i started that thread because i could never inflate my trap speed by spinning of the line. So i wanted some1 with physics behind it to explain it to me. Obviously no could and the real truth came out.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:06 PM
  #104  
Super_SS's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 6,449
Likes: 0
From: N. Side Chi-Town
i got a 2.2 60ft at 108 trap
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:13 PM
  #105  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by laloosh
i started that thread because i could never inflate my trap speed by spinning of the line. So i wanted some1 with physics behind it to explain it to me. Obviously no could and the real truth came out.
lmao, read what i just posted. it does increase trap, and if you think it doesnt you have alot to learn about drag racing. i would love to see you argue your point (sorry other people's points you see as yours) with any experienced drag racer and tell them there is no proof. they will also tell you that some spin is good off the line
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:16 PM
  #106  
laloosh's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-24-07
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey
show me the physics behind it. ive been leaggly dragging since 18, im turning 25 soon, never once did i inflate my trap by spinning.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:17 PM
  #107  
Super_SS's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 6,449
Likes: 0
From: N. Side Chi-Town
Originally Posted by hatrickstu
because it proves you dont know what you are talking about, you are just repeating what you read and ASSUME is correct. it proves you have no grip on the actual concept

this is a difficult thing to argue over the internet, but i will try to help you understand if you are willing to swallow some pride. the guy whos answer you used it actually incorrect in saying distance is not increased. think about it, of course you are still ACTUALLY traveling 1320 feet, but THEORETICALLY your TIRES are traveling a further distance. if your tires travel 1320 feet with no spin, and they rotate a couple times your tires are now covering more distance over a longer period of time. i understand its hard to grasp and it is quite hard to explain. you cant look at extremes to explain this because obviously excessive tire spin will kill your run all together, but MODERATE tire spin WILL increase trap speed and ET. its been proved time and time again, so dont think you have magically come across some reasoning that genius drag racers have never come across before
x2 on this...more spin high trap speed...
For example:sti gets a 1.6 60' and runs 13.4 at 101 for example
u have a turbo hatch, which 60ft is a 2.4 or someshit they do also 13.4 in the 1320 but with much higher trap speed.

i think thats a good comparison...
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:17 PM
  #108  
balla's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
From: socal
Originally Posted by hatrickstu
lmao, read what i just posted. it does increase trap, and if you think it doesnt you have alot to learn about drag racing. i would love to see you argue your point (sorry other people's points you see as yours) with any experienced drag racer and tell them there is no proof
Yeah this kind of reminds me of the unsprung weight discussion(arguement). Physics says one thing, real life trial and error says different.

Laloosh we aren't trying to pull wool over your head, this is just how it is.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:18 PM
  #109  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by balla
Yeah this kind of reminds me of the unsprung weight discussion(arguement). Physics says one thing, real life trial and error says different.

Laloosh we aren't trying to pull wool over your head, this is just how it is.
unsprung weight FTL haha, actually weight in general FTL haha
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:19 PM
  #110  
balla's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
From: socal
Originally Posted by Super_SS
x2 on this...more spin high trap speed...
For example:sti gets a 1.6 60' and runs 13.4 at 101 for example
u have a turbo hatch, which 60ft is a 2.4 or someshit they do also 13.4 in the 1320 but with much higher trap speed.

i think thats a good comparison...
You can't use different cars, that just adds more variables.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:19 PM
  #111  
laloosh's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-24-07
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey
Originally Posted by Super_SS
x2 on this...more spin high trap speed...
For example:sti gets a 1.6 60' and runs 13.4 at 101 for example
u have a turbo hatch, which 60ft is a 2.4 or someshit they do also 13.4 in the 1320 but with much higher trap speed.

i think thats a good comparison...
umm lol no comment
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:20 PM
  #112  
Super_SS's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 6,449
Likes: 0
From: N. Side Chi-Town
idn, im out of my own league. i'll keep spinning half of the track though... :-)
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:21 PM
  #113  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by laloosh
show me the physics behind it. ive been leaggly dragging since 18, im turning 25 soon, never once did i inflate my trap by spinning.
dude, go do your own research, ive done mine. ive never seen you accept anyone else's opinion on a subject if it differed from yours. i just told you the physics behind it and you have no argument against it so whats the problem? i also highly doubt you have never seen increase due to spinning, maybe you just dont know what the hell is going on or you just spun TOO much
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:22 PM
  #114  
laloosh's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-24-07
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey
some1 proove me wrong. With actual though behind it, not just speculation.

time has nothing to do with it. The distance stays the same. The only real way spinning can help is to bring the rpm up, and if it does that, then ure just launching wrong to begin with. you dont acc when u spin, and ure wont acc faster later on because you spun.

Originally Posted by hatrickstu
dude, go do your own research, ive done mine. ive never seen you accept anyone else's opinion on a subject if it differed from yours. i just told you the physics behind it and you have no argument against it so whats the problem? i also highly doubt you have never seen increase due to spinning, maybe you just dont know what the hell is going on or you just spun TOO much
i posted reasoning, u posted speculation. Post your reasoning
DISTANCE DOESNT CHANGE NEWB! having more time to acc over the same disatnce will not make u go faster!

Last edited by laloosh; Feb 6, 2008 at 05:22 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:22 PM
  #115  
balla's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
From: socal
Originally Posted by hatrickstu
unsprung weight FTL haha, actually weight in general FTL haha
lol, yeah physics says, that unsprung weight is = to about 1.5-2.5x that of actual weight. But real life numbers put unsprung closer to 6-10x.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:23 PM
  #116  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by laloosh
some1 proove me wrong. With actual though behind it, not just speculation.

time has nothing to do with it. The distance stays the same. The only real way spinning can help is to bring the rpm up, and if it does that, then ure just launching wrong to begin with. you dont acc when u spin, and ure wont acc faster later on because you spun.
holy cow dude, you wanted it proved in physics terms, i gave you that. how about YOU prove it doesnt work through physics. time does have ALOT to do with it, do you understand understand you can not compute any from of acceleration or speed without time right? wow.

dude distance does increse THEORETICALLY, think about it. how many times are your tires rotating with wheel spin vs not wheel spin. you are increasing time and distance, please tell me that doesnt effect speed. tell em this, do you trap faster with a bog or with a good launch? you are too prideful to learn anything and that is truly aggravating.
Originally Posted by balla
lol, yeah physics says, that unsprung weight is = to about 1.5-2.5x that of actual weight. But real life numbers put unsprung closer to 6-10x.
i agree 100%

Last edited by hatrickstu; Feb 6, 2008 at 05:25 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:25 PM
  #117  
Super_SS's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 6,449
Likes: 0
From: N. Side Chi-Town
speed=rate/time

i think thats it, im trying to remmeber back to my school days
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:28 PM
  #118  
laloosh's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-24-07
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey
ok explain this.

You spin u dotn acc as fast as you should right?
If u hook and acc to max of the tires ability u will be acc and thus going faster. right?

say to 330ft: BTW TWO IDENTICAL CARS

You spin and 6.0 @ 60mph
I hook and go 5.0 @ 60

your telling me your car will acc faster to the end of the track becuase you spun? LOL

keep in mind that in reality a car that hooks and acc faster will be going faster by 330 to beging with, so in reality u will not only be going slower and taking longer to get there, but no u have to make up time AND speed to over come your loss.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:31 PM
  #119  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by laloosh
ok explain this.

You spin u dotn acc as fast as you should right?
If u hook and acc to max of the tires ability u will be acc and thus going faster. right?

say to 330ft:

You spin and 6.0 @ 60mph
I hook and go 5.0 @ 60

your telling me your car will acc faster to the end of the track becuase you spun? LOL

keep in mind that in reality a car that hooks and acc faster will be going faster by 330 to beging with, so in reality u will not only be going slower and taking longer to get there, but no u have to make up time AND speed to over come your loss.
no, you WILL NOT be doing the same MPH in your example.

you honestly do not understand and are not willing to accept anyone else's opinion no matter how factually based they are. you have done this in any argument i have ever seen you in, so i guess ill just wait for more people to come in here and attempt to explain it to you
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:31 PM
  #120  
laloosh's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-24-07
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey
the reason u trap lower when u bog is because u are not putting power down cause ure rpms drop. it has nothign to do with spinning tires and distance. The reason spinning doesnt lower ure trap speed is because u are acc faster while spinning then while bogging.

Like i said, prove me wrong
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:32 PM
  #121  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by laloosh
the reason u trap lower when u bog is because u are not putting power down cause ure rpms drop. it has nothign to do with spinning tires and distance. The reason spinning doesnt lower ure trap speed is because u are acc faster while spinning then while bogging.

Like i said, prove me wrong
i have already proven you wrong, proof is not enough for you.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:32 PM
  #122  
laloosh's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-24-07
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey
Originally Posted by hatrickstu
no, you WILL NOT be doing the same MPH in your example.

you honestly do not understand and are not willing to accept anyone else's opinion no matter how factually based they are. you have done this in any argument i have ever seen you in, so i guess ill just wait for more people to come in here and attempt to explain it to you
EXACTLY i will be going FASTER cause i acc. faster to the 330. When u acc faster over A SET DISTANCE that means ure trap speed at that distance will be FASTER. Which according to your theory, your car whch trapped and ran slower to 330 now will make up time and trap speed by the 1/4....which is impossible due to p/w ratio given its the identical car
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:33 PM
  #123  
Super_SS's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 6,449
Likes: 0
From: N. Side Chi-Town
idn, im just chillen here really... i'll hit 12's one day stock.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:35 PM
  #124  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by laloosh
EXACTLY i will be going FASTER cause i acc. faster to the 330. When u acc faster over A SET DISTANCE that means ure trap speed at that distance will be FASTER. Which according to your theory, your car whch trapped and ran slower to 330 now will make up time and trap speed by the 1/4....which is impossible due to p/w ratio given its the identical car
no dude i believe if the car SPUN marginally in your example, it will be going faster at the 330, by a certain MPH i cannot say because i would have to know WAY more information that your given info
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 05:37 PM
  #125  
laloosh's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-24-07
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey
see this is the thing. If spinning gains u trap, that means ure putting down more power based on rpm. If u launch right and get max power down by hookign up, spinning wont do **** for u
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:13 AM.