Drag Racing Kindle Racing and Dalcorp Racing

Official...NHRA Top Fuelers will run just 1000 ft

Old Jul 3, 2008 | 10:20 AM
  #1  
Doc's Avatar
Doc
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-11-05
Posts: 9,438
Likes: 0
From: Oceanside, Ca
Official...NHRA Top Fuelers will run just 1000 ft

www.nhra.com/content/news/30355.htm

7/2/2008

As the investigation continues into the tragic accident that took the life of driver Scott Kalitta, NHRA has announced that beginning at the Mopar Mile High Nationals in Denver, Colo., both the Top Fuel and Funny Car classes will race to 1,000 feet instead of the traditional 1,320 feet or one-quarter mile. This is an interim step that is being taken while NHRA continues to analyze and determine whether changes should be made to build upon the sport's long standing safety record, given the inherent risks and ever-present dangers associated with the sport.

This interim change was made by NHRA in collaboration with professional race teams. NHRA believes that racing the Top Fuel and Funny Car classes to 1,000 feet will allow NHRA and the racing community time to evaluate, analyze and implement potential changes based on the safety initiatives outlined last week.

With the change, fans will still be able to enjoy the sights, sounds and thrill of NHRA nitro racing with speeds around 300 mph and quick elapsed times to 1,000 feet.

Over the years, NHRA has implemented many initiatives to enhance safety including measures to limit speeds from increasing, personal protective gear, vehicle improvements, and track enhancements such as sand traps, catch nets and concrete barriers the entire length of the drag strip.

In the wake of the tragic series of events that took Kalitta's life, the following technical issues are currently under investigation: 1) what might be done to reduce engine failures; 2) parachute mounting techniques and materials as well as identifying a parachute material that could be more fire resistant; 3) exploring whether there is a way to increase brake efficiency when cars lose downforce due to the loss of the body; 4) analyzing additional methods that might be developed at the top end of the race track to help arrest runaway vehicles; 5) considering whether current speeds should be further limited or reduced to potentially improve safety.

“The board members of the Professional Racers Owners Organization (PRO) wholeheartedly and unanimously support this decision,” said its president Kenny Bernstein. “We want to thank NHRA for listening to our input and suggestions to incorporate these changes. It is not lost on any of us that this constitutes a change in our history of running a quarter-mile, but it's the most immediate adjustment we can make in the interest of safety which is foremost on everyone's mind. This may be a temporary change and we recognize it is not the total answer. We will continue to work hand in hand with NHRA to evaluate other methods of making Top Fuel and Funny Car competition safer so that we might return to our quarter-mile racing standard. We also want to thank Connie Kalitta for his invaluable input. He has been a rock through these difficult times.”
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2008 | 12:30 AM
  #2  
fmxr47's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 05-15-08
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
From: ohio
thas gay!, i want my quarter mile, kinda like i want my whopper!!!
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 03:09 PM
  #3  
Rodimus_Prime's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 04-02-06
Posts: 4,513
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
I think theres better ways of slowing down the cars
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 06:20 PM
  #4  
MP81's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 07-10-08
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 3
From: Washington Township, MI
Originally Posted by Rodimus_Prime
I think theres better ways of slowing down the cars
Like not putting a concrete wall after an incredibly short sand trap?
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 06:22 PM
  #5  
Altiery54's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-01-07
Posts: 7,914
Likes: 0
From: Braidwood, Illinois
wtf come on now
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 06:23 PM
  #6  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
hahahhahahahaha all you guys can suck it now. i dont want to hear **** about my 1000 times.

im dead serious too, you have no idea how many times i had to explain to people the reason there are even 1000 times, measurements, etc. this was talked about WAY back in the day as well.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 06:23 PM
  #7  
XM15's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by MP81
Like not putting a concrete wall after an incredibly short sand trap?
Something like that. lol
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 06:24 PM
  #8  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by MP81
Like not putting a concrete wall after an incredibly short sand trap?
you have to consider the tracks are already long as hell, and they cant just have a 2 mile long shut down area.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 06:27 PM
  #9  
MP81's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 07-10-08
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 3
From: Washington Township, MI
Sure you can.

The track that had the death occur at had an abnormally small sandtrap - and a wall.

I mean, god, at least leave the end open!
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 06:30 PM
  #10  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by MP81
Sure you can.

The track that had the death occur at had an abnormally small sandtrap - and a wall.

I mean, god, at least leave the end open!
no, really, you cant. thats the thing. they are all already built and most are not going to have the land to do it on. IF they did, it would be a silly investment because there is no real advantage financially or from an attractiveness perspective for the remaining 320 feet just for the occasional top fuel race.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 06:41 PM
  #11  
MP81's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 07-10-08
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 3
From: Washington Township, MI
But in most cases, it's only the top fuel cars that need that extra room - really the track that Kaletta died on was not a common situation.

1/8 of a mile of cool down is usually more than enough time to slow down without slamming on the brakes. Why penalize everyone else who's not going 300mph.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 07:11 PM
  #12  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
I don't think they plan to penalize everyone not doing 300mph.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 07:19 PM
  #13  
stryder's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-14-06
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
lol thats funny if they knocking it down to 1000ft and they think they will still get top speeds of 300mph NOT 260mph to maybe 290mph. whatever though i will still watch it but won't be impressed.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 07:54 PM
  #14  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by MP81
But in most cases, it's only the top fuel cars that need that extra room - really the track that Kaletta died on was not a common situation.

1/8 of a mile of cool down is usually more than enough time to slow down without slamming on the brakes. Why penalize everyone else who's not going 300mph.
they arent penalizing everyone, its only the top fuel and FC guys
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 10:32 PM
  #15  
Turbo Wax's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 12-14-05
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
From: Florida
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Not true They Kill Sport Compact Racing
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 11:42 PM
  #16  
BlkWdoSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 06-11-07
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 0
From: Texas
they have done a really great job of slaughtering sport compact racing

it is only the TF drags and FCs that are gonna b shutting down at the 1000ft mark but the 320 ft is going to seriously change the MPH of the race cars at their trap, also the way the MPH at the 1000ft mark is calibrated differently than it is at the trap box at 1320ft, so the tracks are all going to have to be swapped over

differently meaning the length of trap space

also, we can evaluate and re evaluate until we are blue in the face, the answers are simply that the motor needs to be better covered for scatter, the bodies need to be locked down in a different fashion, where they wont blow off as easily, the chutes absolutely have to be made of a non burning material, and tire companies need to build a tire that can keep up with the sport.

the pro stock cars are all over the track and they only do 200mph
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 01:57 AM
  #17  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
im lost, and maybe i havent read enough. how is this killing sport compact racing? serious question
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 01:59 AM
  #18  
ls1fbody's Avatar
Haz l33t wheelz.
 
Joined: 09-14-07
Posts: 18,883
Likes: 3
From: Costa Mesa CA
sorry doc, someone posted this last night. but you actually posted the article, not just the link, so actually you win.

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/lounge-42/1-4-mile-being-changed-shorter-length-121564/
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 02:02 AM
  #19  
campo165's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-15-05
Posts: 6,216
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
im not even interested in going to see the top fuels anymore. i hope everyone boycotts this bullshit. I am SO SICK of people thinking new rules will help people...this is EXACTLY how governments fail and citizens lose all freedom. It is happening in EVERY aspect of life, now including the nhra.


but lets be safe, right!? cause you know, people think they can always save people from death! cause you know, thats a realistic thought.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 02:07 AM
  #20  
fballman1987's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-03-06
Posts: 6,793
Likes: 0
From: New Tripoli, Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by campo165
im not even interested in going to see the top fuels anymore. i hope everyone boycotts this bullshit. I am SO SICK of people thinking new rules will help people...this is EXACTLY how governments fail and citizens lose all freedom. It is happening in EVERY aspect of life, now including the nhra.


but lets be safe, right!? cause you know, people think they can always save people from death! cause you know, thats a realistic thought.
lets regulate something thats dangerous by just starting up the engine... we'll increase prices and advertise it as new and improved, bullshit.... they have been going that fast for a couple years.... freak accident, very sad one at that, but its just a way to make themselves feel less responsible for anything that may happen from here on out... now if anything happens, well we shortened the race length, not our fault...
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 01:38 PM
  #21  
Turbo Wax's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 12-14-05
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
From: Florida
The point I was trying to make is that little by little NHRA is killing the sport, I use Sport Compact as an example, now this rule, sure the teams love this, less spares, less wear,less money to spend for them, and less for us the Fans

but that is just my 0.02
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DarrenGC
2.2L L61 Performance Tech
18
Dec 24, 2021 01:55 PM
Zharrington_2010LNF
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
21
Feb 8, 2016 01:43 PM
dieGone
Complete Cars
0
Oct 1, 2015 06:27 PM
Tupp
Suspension
5
Sep 30, 2015 08:18 PM
Cobalt_Daddy
Pictures & Videos
0
Sep 27, 2015 06:59 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:42 PM.