Drag Racing Kindle Racing and Dalcorp Racing

Top fuel acceleration put into perspective

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 8, 2011 | 01:01 PM
  #1  
06' SS2SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-07-06
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 0
From: Y
Top fuel acceleration put into perspective

TOP FUEL ACCELERATION PUT INTO PERSPECTIVE



* One Top Fuel dragster 500 cubic-inch Hemi engine makes more

horsepower (8,000 HP) than the first 4 rows at the Daytona 500.


* Under full throttle, a dragster engine consumes 11.2 gallons of

nitro methane per second; a fully loaded 747 consumes jet fuel at the same

rate with 25% less energy being produced.


* A stock Dodge Hemi V8 engine cannot produce enough power to merely

drive the dragster's supercharger.


* With 3000 CFM of air being rammed in by the supercharger on

overdrive, the fuel mixture is compressed into a near-solid form before ignition.

Cylinders run on the verge of hydraulic lock at full throttle.


* At the stoichiometric 1.7:1 air/fuel mixture for nitro methane the

flame front temperature measures 7050 degrees F.


* Nitro methane burns yellow. The spectacular white flame seen above

the stacks at night is raw burning hydrogen, dissociated from atmospheric

water vapor by the searing exhaust gases.


* Dual magnetos supply 44 amps to each spark plug. This is the output

of an arc welder in each cylinder.


* Spark plug electrodes are totally consumed during a pass. After 1/2

way, the engine is dieseling from compression plus the glow of exhaust

valves at 1400 degrees F. The engine can only be shut down by cutting

the fuel flow.


* If spark momentarily fails early in the run, unburned nitro builds

up in the affected cylinders and then explodes with sufficient force to

blow cylinder heads off the block in pieces or split the block in

half.


* Dragsters reach over 300 MPH before you have completed reading this

sentence.


* In order to exceed 300 MPH in 4.5 seconds, dragsters must accelerate

an average of over 4 G's. In order to reach 200 MPH well before

half-track, the launch acceleration approaches 8 G's.


* Top Fuel engines turn approximately 540 revolutions from light to

light!


* Including the burnout, the engine must only survive 900 revolutions

under load.


* The redline is actually quite high at 9500 RPM.


* THE BOTTOM LINE: Assuming all the equipment is paid off, the crew

worked for free, & for once, NOTHING BLOWS UP, each run costs an

estimated $1,000 per second.


0 to 100 MPH in .8 seconds (the first 60 feet of the run)

0 to 200 MPH in 2.2 seconds (the first 350 feet of the run)

6 g-forces at the starting line (nothing accelerates faster on land)

6 negative g-forces upon deployment of twin chutes at 300 MPH


* An NHRA Top Fuel Dragster accelerates quicker than any other land

vehicle on earth, quicker than a jet fighter plane, quicker than the space

shuttle.


* The current Top Fuel dragster elapsed time record is 4.420 seconds for

the quarter-mile (2004, Doug Kalitta). The top speed record is 337.58

MPH as measured over the last 66' of the run (2005, Tony Schumacher).



Putting this all into perspective:



You are driving the average $220,000 Ford GT twin-turbo. Over a mile

up the road, a Top Fuel dragster is staged & ready to launch down a

quarter-mile strip as you pass. You have the advantage of a flying start. You run

the GT hard up through the gears and blast across the starting line & pass

the dragster at an honest 200 MPH. The 'tree' goes green for both of you

at that moment. The dragster launches & starts after you. You keep your foot down

hard, but you hear an incredibly brutal whine that sears your eardrums &

within 3 seconds the dragster catches & passes you. He beats you to the finish line,

a quarter-mile away from where you just passed him. Think about it - from a standing start,

the dragster had spotted you 200 MPH & not only caught, but nearly blasted you off the

road when he passed you within a mere 1320 foot long race!



That's acceleration!

Last edited by 06' SS2SS; Feb 8, 2011 at 01:09 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2011 | 01:05 PM
  #2  
08ShowbaltLS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-01-09
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, FL
ahh i needed that today. good read!

cobalts are still faster tho
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2011 | 01:06 PM
  #3  
padlock's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: 07-20-09
Posts: 5,305
Likes: 0
From: Platteville, WI
repost but still amazing
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2011 | 01:08 PM
  #4  
BYT*SS*TURBO's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 05-01-09
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 0
From: NEPA/North NJ
Pretty cool info and read
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2011 | 01:12 PM
  #5  
jsscooby's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-08-07
Posts: 3,868
Likes: 0
From: USA
think ive seen this on here before but it is still good to read.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2011 | 01:19 PM
  #6  
CudaJoe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-21-09
Posts: 11,280
Likes: 74
From: Newark, DE
Yea, But top Fuel Dragsters arent street legal so that last scenario would never happen!

Twin Turbo Ford GT for the WIN! Jeremy Clarkson would probably disagree though.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2011 | 01:20 PM
  #7  
Kahless's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-10-05
Posts: 13,359
Likes: 5
From: TX
you changed that around or the site you posted it from is full of tards. it used to read z06 vette at 200mph. obviously from a biased chevy site since the gt didnt cost 220k and it wasnt twin turbo. and since the gt can do 217 using it in this scenario is also retarded
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2011 | 01:30 PM
  #8  
06' SS2SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-07-06
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 0
From: Y
Originally Posted by Kahless
you changed that around or the site you posted it from is full of tards. it used to read z06 vette at 200mph. obviously from a biased chevy site since the gt didnt cost 220k and it wasnt twin turbo. and since the gt can do 217 using it in this scenario is also retarded
I actually got it in an e-mail. regardless of what kind of car/brand is in the write up, the stats are pretty amazing. And sorry for the repost. I searched but didn't find it, so I posted this version (HEMI/Ford bias).
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2011 | 01:36 PM
  #9  
Chevycobaltss3's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 10-24-08
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 1
From: Vine Grove Kentucky
seen it before but damn ill read it again any day.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2011 | 01:38 PM
  #10  
defo98's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-16-09
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey then. Now Orlando Florida
damn thats crazy
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2011 | 02:00 PM
  #11  
jb09ss's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 04-01-09
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: causapscal, qc
The part about the dragster catching the ford gt @ 200 mph is false. 200 mph is about 293.2 ft/s, so without acceleration the ford gt would take around 4.5 seconds to complete the 1/4 mile, so the dragster and the ford gt would cross the finish line at the same time. Still impressive.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
06MetallicBalt
Mid East
10
Jul 20, 2025 08:47 PM
Supercharged06SS
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
21
Dec 11, 2022 04:47 PM
no_ss
Problems/Service/Maintenance
11
Oct 18, 2015 11:58 PM
Jesse
Stuff
0
Oct 1, 2015 05:47 PM
DocSvensk
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
7
Sep 27, 2015 02:24 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:26 PM.