Trouble at the track!!
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: 09-21-06
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
From: Troy,Ohio
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: 07-02-05
Posts: 8,725
Likes: 2
From: West Carrollton (Dayton), OH
Wideband. That is all. Actually, no. You need H/DP/E to make use of the air you are pulling in. And without waiting between laps and no meth/dualpass, you are not going to reach full potential. Why else do you think I had high 13's the first time with the Harrop, my 60' was terrible (2.3) and i was choking on my stock H/DP/2.5" catback
Ever notice those times of the fastest ss's all but one have DR's? The first 60' of a 1/4mi is HUGE in determining the outcome. Don't ask how he did it other than luck, but my friend from Wooster hit 13.2 @ 106 on a 2.9" pulley, proper supporting mods, and one of my tunes. 60' was 1.9. bhowman1984 is his name on .net.
SS/SC, MODDED,STILL USING THE STOCK SUPERCHARGER(NO OTHER POWER ADDERS)
1.)DWK5150,12.84@110.53 w/2.04 60',I/PB/DP/E/2.5"/HE/T/DR's
2.)Fast06SS,12.86@109.13 w/1.93 60', I/E/CD/T/2.5"/DR's
3.)CobaltSS1,13.18@108.05 w/2.11 60',I/GMH/E/2.6"/T/ST
4.)Enufpwr,13.20@106.13 w/2.03 60', I/E/T/2.5"/CD/DP/DR's
5.)R33P3R007,13.23@106.72 w/2.05 60',H/DP/2.7"/T/DR's
6.)hatrickstu,13.31@104.84 w/2.09 60'GM2/CAI/E/DR's
7.)PatathSS,13.32@105.66 w/2.08 60', I/H/T/2.5"/DR's
8.)black06ss,13.32@111.33 w/2.22 60',I/H/E/HE/2.7"/T/DR's
9.)Bad06SS,13.35@104.50 w/1.95 60', 2.6"/T/CD/GMH/DR's
10.)06blackg85ss,13.36@105.50 w/2.05 60', H/E/WI/HE/2.5"/T/DR
C what I mean!!
1.)DWK5150,12.84@110.53 w/2.04 60',I/PB/DP/E/2.5"/HE/T/DR's
2.)Fast06SS,12.86@109.13 w/1.93 60', I/E/CD/T/2.5"/DR's
3.)CobaltSS1,13.18@108.05 w/2.11 60',I/GMH/E/2.6"/T/ST
4.)Enufpwr,13.20@106.13 w/2.03 60', I/E/T/2.5"/CD/DP/DR's
5.)R33P3R007,13.23@106.72 w/2.05 60',H/DP/2.7"/T/DR's
6.)hatrickstu,13.31@104.84 w/2.09 60'GM2/CAI/E/DR's
7.)PatathSS,13.32@105.66 w/2.08 60', I/H/T/2.5"/DR's
8.)black06ss,13.32@111.33 w/2.22 60',I/H/E/HE/2.7"/T/DR's
9.)Bad06SS,13.35@104.50 w/1.95 60', 2.6"/T/CD/GMH/DR's
10.)06blackg85ss,13.36@105.50 w/2.05 60', H/E/WI/HE/2.5"/T/DR
C what I mean!!
Ever notice those times of the fastest ss's all but one have DR's? The first 60' of a 1/4mi is HUGE in determining the outcome. Don't ask how he did it other than luck, but my friend from Wooster hit 13.2 @ 106 on a 2.9" pulley, proper supporting mods, and one of my tunes. 60' was 1.9. bhowman1984 is his name on .net.
Last edited by WickedSS2005; Jun 15, 2008 at 12:27 AM.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: 09-21-06
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
From: Troy,Ohio
Senior Member
Joined: 07-08-05
Posts: 6,200
Likes: 0
From: Niceville, FL
1. Get a dual pass, front mount heat exchanger, methanol injection, and a better tune!
2. I know what lsjwannabe is looking at!
Yes, DR's or slicks are the way to go. Evidence to support this theory was recently proven on my Integra. 8.8 in the 1/8th spinning on Fuzion ZRi's all the way down, and then with some slicks slapped on BAM 8.0@90mph with a 1.9 60' since my buddy was sleeping at the tree! 
2. I know what lsjwannabe is looking at!
Ever notice those times of the fastest ss's all but one have DR's? The first 60' of a 1/4mi is HUGE in determining the outcome. Don't ask how he did it other than luck, but my friend from Wooster hit 13.2 @ 106 on a 2.9" pulley, proper supporting mods, and one of my tunes. 60' was 1.9. bhowman1984 is his name on .net.
Last edited by 2K5SS/SC?; Jun 15, 2008 at 10:16 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Senior Member
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
you need dual pass, meth, better tune, header, downpipe, full exhaust to run a 2.6" pulley. I'm on stock pulley and I pull on 2.6" pullied cars. Go do some more research. Your car probably hates you right now.
Senior Member
Joined: 07-08-05
Posts: 6,200
Likes: 0
From: Niceville, FL
You're exactly right though, he needs the supporting mods for it without a doubt!
Senior Member
Joined: 07-08-05
Posts: 6,200
Likes: 0
From: Niceville, FL
I can't people the people with such small pulleys with no cooling mods and stock exhaust. It's unbelievable.
