Full face vs. 6 puck
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 03-08-11
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Full face vs. 6 puck
It's time to replace the stock clutch on the lnf. I have downpipe,catback,cai, and hp tune coming in a month, so I'll be looking at increased torque.
I'm pretty set on the KY clutch but I am still open to suggestions, I simply cant afford an expensive setup and from reviews, more expensive clutches have received the same(if not more) negative feedback.
So I know full face clutches generally last longer but are more prone to slipping because they cant support increased torque. 6 puck setup should hold more torque but not last as long. With the setup im going to have, would you suggest KY stage 1 or 2? Basically would you suggest a 6 puck clutch for basic bolt ons and tune?
Edit: oh and yea this car's warranty went up this month. only has ~25k miles on it. I'm the second owner and the car was completely raped when we bought it So I'm 90% sure its not my driving thats ruining clutches
I'm pretty set on the KY clutch but I am still open to suggestions, I simply cant afford an expensive setup and from reviews, more expensive clutches have received the same(if not more) negative feedback.
So I know full face clutches generally last longer but are more prone to slipping because they cant support increased torque. 6 puck setup should hold more torque but not last as long. With the setup im going to have, would you suggest KY stage 1 or 2? Basically would you suggest a 6 puck clutch for basic bolt ons and tune?
Edit: oh and yea this car's warranty went up this month. only has ~25k miles on it. I'm the second owner and the car was completely raped when we bought it So I'm 90% sure its not my driving thats ruining clutches
#3
No matter what brand/type of clutch, you need one that you can live with. If you are going to be DDing your car I would steer clear of puck-type clutches, due to their on-off engagment. That will get old quick. If you are going to be taking the car to the course or track then go for holding power over smooth engagement and get a puck-type clutch.
#5
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 03-08-11
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey bro, honestly tourque capacity it a issues. So running acfull face and a higher tq load it won't last. So I recommend the 6 puck..... And a full face disc has.better slipping but if your making more power then the clutch can hold then u sol be purchasing a new clutch soon
No matter what brand/type of clutch, you need one that you can live with. If you are going to be DDing your car I would steer clear of puck-type clutches, due to their on-off engagment. That will get old quick. If you are going to be taking the car to the course or track then go for holding power over smooth engagement and get a puck-type clutch.
So KY stage 2 looks like a good option for my setup?
#8
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 03-08-11
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I had the spare money Id be willing. But I don't see the point in spending $400 more for it to feel better. I'm a poor college student lol
#9
Clutch material (like organic, kevlar, ceramic, blended, etc.) also has a big hand in clutch life. Depending on the material, you can accidentally burn or glaze one pretty bad and basically ruin it early. Others can be driven on and brought back, and others aren't prone to glazing. I guess I'm just saying that puck vs. disk isn't the only variable at hand here.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-05-10
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What makes a puck type clutch not last as long as full face disk...my clutch is completely fucked, want the KY 6 puck. I'm afraid the tranny will break though..
#17
Senior Member
hey do you know if we can just order a new disc from ky or would i have to buy an entire new kit, i noticed when i looked at mine yesterday it a few nicks on it, like maybe it wasn't lined up correctly when first put in
#18
Basically, starting with less clutch material to begin with means less to rub away before you run out of material.
Last edited by Stamina; 01-30-2012 at 02:45 PM.
#20
New Member
Join Date: 06-29-11
Location: Unionville, MI
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i was looking at the zzp stage 3 (400lbft), or spec 2+ (380lbft) w/fidanza flywheel, or exedy hypersingle setup(w/ excedy flywheel, 350ish ftlbs rating), for a zzp stage 3 setup (catless, fmhe, 80s), 3" catback (resonated), zzp 3"cai, in mind for a future 252et kit, which would be a better option as far as streetablity and clamp load that i wont have to replace the clutch when i get zzp's turbo kit?
#22
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: 09-06-08
Location: east coast
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im running a clutchmasters stage 4 6 puck with lightweight flywheel in my car. While it was fine at first the setup gets old after 2,000 miles. There is no slipping the clutch and the light flywheel makes the car tough to get going. On any hill I look like a 16 year old just learning how to drive stick...with 3" straight pipe exhaust it makes it sound even worse.
#25
New Member
Join Date: 06-29-11
Location: Unionville, MI
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks, wasnt too sure, my buddy had a sn95 5.0 mustang and went from stock to spec stage 3 clutch and his pedal effort was retarted, may have well be a mechanical clutch setup lol, my 66 chevy truck is easier to press than his **** is lol