How much "Crank" HP do I probably have?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: 04-06-10
Posts: 3,702
Likes: 0
From: 6000ft on a Mountain in Colorado!
How much "Crank" HP do I probably have?
When I was first considering a Cobalt SS/SC from my Integra LSVTEC I was trying to research cars stock WHP. V6 Accord Coupe, Civic SI, Scion tC, RSX, Neon SRT-4 etc. after I went SS/SC I went SS/TC and started building power.
I learned that (true or not, it's what I went by) most FWD cars lose 13%-15% for WHP. So if this is true then a stock SS/TC should be around 230whp.
So I stuck by this rule/guideline and I've been telling people I have around 400HP at the crank, because that's about where I dyno if you take away 13%
Anyway, what crank HP do I most likely have and have I been an idiot for saying I'm at 400HP?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOWPreilLwY&sns=em
I learned that (true or not, it's what I went by) most FWD cars lose 13%-15% for WHP. So if this is true then a stock SS/TC should be around 230whp.
So I stuck by this rule/guideline and I've been telling people I have around 400HP at the crank, because that's about where I dyno if you take away 13%
Anyway, what crank HP do I most likely have and have I been an idiot for saying I'm at 400HP?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOWPreilLwY&sns=em
Last edited by vahdyx; Oct 8, 2012 at 12:11 PM.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: 04-06-10
Posts: 3,702
Likes: 0
From: 6000ft on a Mountain in Colorado!
Okay cool because I'm at 350whp and uf I add 13-15% I am indeed at or above 400HP. So this the case then. Thanks that's what I figured just wanted confirmation.
Thanks
Thanks
that's roughly since every dyno reads differently.
with that logic my car makes 302 HP at the crank with GMS1 and no boltons assuming 13% loss. it's only supposed to make 280 at the crank and i doubt it's a factory freak since other balts with GMS1 make similiar numbers on the same dyno lol
with that logic my car makes 302 HP at the crank with GMS1 and no boltons assuming 13% loss. it's only supposed to make 280 at the crank and i doubt it's a factory freak since other balts with GMS1 make similiar numbers on the same dyno lol
Last edited by Cobalt_Daddy; Oct 8, 2012 at 03:22 PM.
Your math is a bit off...
If you have 400 whp, 15% drivetrain loss (added in this case, for bhp)
Don't do 400 x 1.15 = 460 .... Do 400 / .85 = 470(.588)
Because your whp is a percentage loss from bhp, not vice-versa; bhp is not a gain from whp.
If you have 400 whp, 15% drivetrain loss (added in this case, for bhp)
Don't do 400 x 1.15 = 460 .... Do 400 / .85 = 470(.588)
Because your whp is a percentage loss from bhp, not vice-versa; bhp is not a gain from whp.
xxxxx/////////xxxxxx........xxx///xx..x.x.x.x..x.x.x..x.x...x..x..x..x..x..x..x..x.. x..x..x..x.x..x.x.x..x.x..x..x.x..x.x..x..x.x..x.. x.x..x..x.x
========1billion hp...lol
========1billion hp...lol
Last edited by AARON-SS-TC; Oct 20, 2012 at 03:33 PM.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: 04-06-10
Posts: 3,702
Likes: 0
From: 6000ft on a Mountain in Colorado!
So for example lets say i build a 1000whp beast doing the math it's a 136-176 extra horses to the crank vs the 30 extra it began with. So does it really stay true to the percentage regardless of how much I increase or is there a point I need to stop going just by percentage?
What about growth? So the higher I go the more it increases. Sure at 260 the stock is 230whp or so, but shouldn't the percentage diminish as it rises.
So for example lets say i build a 1000whp beast doing the math it's a 136-176 extra horses to the crank vs the 30 extra it began with. So does it really stay true to the percentage regardless of how much I increase or is there a point I need to stop going just by percentage?
So for example lets say i build a 1000whp beast doing the math it's a 136-176 extra horses to the crank vs the 30 extra it began with. So does it really stay true to the percentage regardless of how much I increase or is there a point I need to stop going just by percentage?
Horsepower is a calculation from actual dyno measurement too, and can be altered in the dyno software.
And, for us at altitude, the corrected horsepower numbers aren't even remotely close to what were actually putting down, they are a computer calculation simulating what we MIGHT put down at that corrected situation.
I suppose what we ought to be talking about is torque (at the wheels) curve- leave horsepower out altogether, and talk about the whole curve, not just peak torque. That, and cylinder pressure graphing. anybody got a Pico ?




Don't listen to any of these haters dude. You are probly making more horsepower than you think. Juast follow this advice and you will be good 