Dyno Results Dyno pictures, videos and dyno results.

I R disappoint :(

Old 12-28-2015, 09:55 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OzzyruleZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-13-07
Location: Keystone Heights, Fl
Posts: 6,664
Received 30 Likes on 28 Posts
I R disappoint :(

So me and a couple friends decided to do a little dyno tuning today. I took the sleeper Z31 and my friend his M62 LD9 Cavy Z24.

I'm gonna be honest both of us were expecting about 30-40whp more. Heartbreaker dyno I tell ya!

Anyways to make things easier to view I'm posting a dyno graph with both our numbers on them.

Mine is blue, his is red.

Old 12-29-2015, 06:04 AM
  #2  
Moderator
Platinum Member
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Slowbalt2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-15-11
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 27,413
Received 584 Likes on 519 Posts
Why didnt you use SAE or STP correction? It would be more comparable and accurate imo
Old 12-29-2015, 08:33 AM
  #3  
Super Moderator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (66)
 
riceburner's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-18-11
Location: West Chicago, IL
Posts: 39,848
Received 87 Likes on 74 Posts
so you think you're over 400whp? Nice!!
Old 12-29-2015, 08:50 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OzzyruleZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-13-07
Location: Keystone Heights, Fl
Posts: 6,664
Received 30 Likes on 28 Posts
No. The dyno says I only has 370whp. I was hoping it would be over 400whp. This means back to the drawing board.

Uncorrected shows better numbers for boosted vehicles. Not sure why.
Old 12-29-2015, 10:07 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ECaulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-10
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,574
Received 836 Likes on 733 Posts
Still nice numbers.

Time for bigger turbo
Old 12-29-2015, 10:18 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OzzyruleZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-13-07
Location: Keystone Heights, Fl
Posts: 6,664
Received 30 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by ECaulk
Still nice numbers.

Time for bigger turbo
6262 isn't exactly a little turbo lol
Old 12-29-2015, 11:32 AM
  #7  
Moderator
Platinum Member
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Slowbalt2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-15-11
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 27,413
Received 584 Likes on 519 Posts
Originally Posted by OzzyruleZ
No. The dyno says I only has 370whp. I was hoping it would be over 400whp. This means back to the drawing board.

Uncorrected shows better numbers for boosted vehicles. Not sure why.
"Better" doesnt mean accurate lol

Dont worry so much about the numbers though, as long as its fast right?
Old 12-29-2015, 11:44 AM
  #8  
Slobodan Milošević
iTrader: (8)
 
07blackg5's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-07
Location: Serbia
Posts: 5,960
Received 215 Likes on 175 Posts
Numbers are 110% the most important thing. How else can you be popular on the internet?
The following users liked this post:
GBRunner24 (12-31-2015)
Old 12-29-2015, 11:51 AM
  #9  
Moderator
Platinum Member
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Slowbalt2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-15-11
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 27,413
Received 584 Likes on 519 Posts
Originally Posted by 07blackg5
Numbers are 110% the most important thing. How else can you be popular on the internet?
Build the worlds fastest m62 l61
Old 12-29-2015, 12:02 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ECaulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-10
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,574
Received 836 Likes on 733 Posts
Originally Posted by OzzyruleZ
6262 isn't exactly a little turbo lol
Are you at the flow limit at 15psi?
Old 12-29-2015, 12:08 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OzzyruleZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-13-07
Location: Keystone Heights, Fl
Posts: 6,664
Received 30 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by Slowbalt2000
"Better" doesnt mean accurate lol

Dont worry so much about the numbers though, as long as its fast right?
Uncorrected is exactly that. What the dyno measured at that time. Sae is corrected for temp, 70* if I remember correctly. So technically uncorrected is more accurate. It is happens to be higher.
Old 12-29-2015, 12:09 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OzzyruleZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-13-07
Location: Keystone Heights, Fl
Posts: 6,664
Received 30 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by ECaulk
Are you at the flow limit at 15psi?
Doubtful. This turbo can flow a ridiculous amount. Others with less head and cam than me have done over 400whp on 15psi
Old 12-29-2015, 03:34 PM
  #13  
Moderator
Platinum Member
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Slowbalt2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-15-11
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 27,413
Received 584 Likes on 519 Posts
Originally Posted by OzzyruleZ
Uncorrected is exactly that. What the dyno measured at that time. Sae is corrected for temp, 70* if I remember correctly. So technically uncorrected is more accurate. It is happens to be higher.
Exactly, but unless you dyno again at exactly the same temp, humidy, baro, etc. youll never be able to compare even your own numbers if you were to dyno again, unless you wrote down the correction factor for that day. Btw dynojets dont measure torque, just time and speed.
Old 12-29-2015, 03:45 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OzzyruleZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-13-07
Location: Keystone Heights, Fl
Posts: 6,664
Received 30 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by Slowbalt2000
Exactly, but unless you dyno again at exactly the same temp, humidy, baro, etc. youll never be able to compare even your own numbers if you were to dyno again, unless you wrote down the correction factor for that day. Btw dynojets dont measure torque, just time and speed.
Who goes to the dyno and doesn't do a baseline pull before starting more tuning?

Besides I have the files and dyno viewer I can change the correction at will not a big deal.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Devin86
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
11
01-08-2016 05:49 PM
AKillEaze
Dyno Results
15
01-05-2016 12:42 AM
OzzyruleZ
War Stories
8
12-14-2015 11:22 PM
aebooth6
Tuning
1
12-03-2015 03:53 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: I R disappoint :(



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:09 AM.