stock M62 dyno results
08-03-2010, 10:27 AM
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-13-05
Location: WI
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How I'd love to switch to E85. It's a haul through some of Milwaukee's worst neighborhoods to get to a station that supplies E85. Not really worth it when I still DD my Cobalt.
08-03-2010, 10:57 AM
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: 11-11-05
Location: Oceanside, Ca
Posts: 9,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hit 300+whp many times on 91 octane...although it's nothing that would be reliable for many miles.
being that E85 is being used, there is much more available in both hp and torque.
being that E85 is being used, there is much more available in both hp and torque.
08-03-2010, 02:26 PM
#37
people before your time im afraid. Hell i dont even remember most of their account names. I know shaun is one of them though.
Back then, people used to think the LSJs couldnt take more than 300whp without needing internals because everyone was hitting that number (or less) with the stock blower using 2.5 and 2.6 pulleys, making a bunch of heat, and blowing pistons in the process. This was back in the early days
Back then, people used to think the LSJs couldnt take more than 300whp without needing internals because everyone was hitting that number (or less) with the stock blower using 2.5 and 2.6 pulleys, making a bunch of heat, and blowing pistons in the process. This was back in the early days
08-03-2010, 02:32 PM
#38
people before your time im afraid. Hell i dont even remember most of their account names. I know shaun is one of them though.
Back then, people used to think the LSJs couldnt take more than 300whp without needing internals because everyone was hitting that number (or less) with the stock blower using 2.5 and 2.6 pulleys, making a bunch of heat, and blowing pistons in the process. This was back in the early days
Back then, people used to think the LSJs couldnt take more than 300whp without needing internals because everyone was hitting that number (or less) with the stock blower using 2.5 and 2.6 pulleys, making a bunch of heat, and blowing pistons in the process. This was back in the early days
o6blackg85 - 296whp
06black - No. Did 304 on the H62
Area47 - 295whp
WSFrazier - No.
04redline0124 - No. 314 on nitrous
04redline (shaunmcdee) - Yes! 311whp pulling out all the stops.
Is there anyone on that list I have missed?
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/dyno-results-170/303whp-w-m62-stock-longblock-im-i-highest-222466/
08-03-2010, 04:19 PM
#40
I joined in 2007. Shaun and are the the only ones that I know of who did it on the stock long block. IE, no cams, no valve springs, no neutral balanced shafts, no forged pistons.
o6blackg85 - 296whp
06black - No. Did 304 on the H62
Area47 - 295whp
WSFrazier - No.
04redline0124 - No. 314 on nitrous
04redline (shaunmcdee) - Yes! 311whp pulling out all the stops.
Is there anyone on that list I have missed?
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/showthread.php?t=222466
o6blackg85 - 296whp
06black - No. Did 304 on the H62
Area47 - 295whp
WSFrazier - No.
04redline0124 - No. 314 on nitrous
04redline (shaunmcdee) - Yes! 311whp pulling out all the stops.
Is there anyone on that list I have missed?
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/showthread.php?t=222466
08-04-2010, 06:15 PM
#46
(many of them blew piston #4 from running such inefficient setups on 2.5" pulleys, but back then thats how people made power. They just thought the stock longblock had weak internals).
There were plenty of people over 275whp, and a few over 300whp. I remember trying to memorize their formulas for "high horsepower LSJs", but i didnt much care for their account names. I lurked a bit more back then than i do these days
maybe ask shaun? he was around then, and being that he was one of the people to do it, he might remember
08-04-2010, 06:26 PM
#47
loll, i dont think you're understanding that im not sure who they were. They were posting vids of their fly-bys and such when i first joined the forum, and they didnt stick around long
(many of them blew piston #4 from running such inefficient setups on 2.5" pulleys, but back then thats how people made power. They just thought the stock longblock had weak internals).
There were plenty of people over 275whp, and a few over 300whp. I remember trying to memorize their formulas for "high horsepower LSJs", but i didnt much care for their account names. I lurked a bit more back then than i do these days
maybe ask shaun? he was around then, and being that he was one of the people to do it, he might remember
(many of them blew piston #4 from running such inefficient setups on 2.5" pulleys, but back then thats how people made power. They just thought the stock longblock had weak internals).
There were plenty of people over 275whp, and a few over 300whp. I remember trying to memorize their formulas for "high horsepower LSJs", but i didnt much care for their account names. I lurked a bit more back then than i do these days
maybe ask shaun? he was around then, and being that he was one of the people to do it, he might remember
Your not understanding what I am trying to say.
It did not happen as often as people think. Not on the stock long block and not on the M62.
That is a forum rumor.
08-04-2010, 11:39 PM
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-03-07
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wow i haven't seen hunter post in forever...
eb is right tho it did happen in the older days. not many were on forums or cared to talk about it, but from my knowledge none of the old heads (without nitrous) ever made over 300whp without internals...
eb is right tho it did happen in the older days. not many were on forums or cared to talk about it, but from my knowledge none of the old heads (without nitrous) ever made over 300whp without internals...
Last edited by BoostedYards86; 08-04-2010 at 11:39 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
08-05-2010, 12:06 AM
#50
Put on that Turbo... and you'll blow the other car away.
HORRIBLE idea.
I've already explained this to him. You're wasting your time/energy.
I've already explained this to him. You're wasting your time/energy.
loll, i dont think you're understanding that im not sure who they were. They were posting vids of their fly-bys and such when i first joined the forum, and they didnt stick around long
(many of them blew piston #4 from running such inefficient setups on 2.5" pulleys, but back then thats how people made power. They just thought the stock longblock had weak internals).
There were plenty of people over 275whp, and a few over 300whp. I remember trying to memorize their formulas for "high horsepower LSJs", but i didnt much care for their account names. I lurked a bit more back then than i do these days
maybe ask shaun? he was around then, and being that he was one of the people to do it, he might remember
(many of them blew piston #4 from running such inefficient setups on 2.5" pulleys, but back then thats how people made power. They just thought the stock longblock had weak internals).
There were plenty of people over 275whp, and a few over 300whp. I remember trying to memorize their formulas for "high horsepower LSJs", but i didnt much care for their account names. I lurked a bit more back then than i do these days
maybe ask shaun? he was around then, and being that he was one of the people to do it, he might remember