Forced Induction Turbos/Superchargers

bigger SUPERCHARGER

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 03:02 PM
  #1  
hossdeuce's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 07-23-07
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Glendale, AZ
bigger SUPERCHARGER

cost doesnt matter to me, are there any beefy superchargers that will fit on an 07 SS/SC, i wanna pump as much power out of my 2.0 as possible
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 03:03 PM
  #2  
1badBlueberrySC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-23-08
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
TVS is your best option...

www.ottperformance.com
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 03:07 PM
  #3  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
Get in on the TVS GB.

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/over-top-performance-167/tvs-gb-152639/
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 03:10 PM
  #4  
Rambotk3's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-09-08
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
yup go with the TVS
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 03:16 PM
  #5  
the_rainmaker's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-07-07
Posts: 4,462
Likes: 0
From: clovis, NM
if you really want the most performance...you will have to go turbo
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 03:18 PM
  #6  
Pyros777's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 01-26-05
Posts: 3,418
Likes: 1
From: N/A
^ the TVS is capable of more than most think.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 03:19 PM
  #7  
ColeJJones's Avatar
Bannned
 
Joined: 09-08-07
Posts: 8,743
Likes: 0
From: Kaneohe, HI
money doesnt matter to you? grab a kenne bell 1.6l and have some custom **** made. tell us the results
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 03:20 PM
  #8  
the_rainmaker's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-07-07
Posts: 4,462
Likes: 0
From: clovis, NM
i'm not doubting that but he said he wanted the most power possible. and so far has that not been all turbo converted cars? I could be wrong but thats what i remember reading
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 03:20 PM
  #9  
ChevyRockstar's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 03-10-08
Posts: 6,629
Likes: 1
From: El Paso
TVS go with OTTP
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 03:21 PM
  #10  
1badBlueberrySC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-23-08
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
The TVS is capable of ALOT more than people think... you all will see here in the upcomming months!
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 03:23 PM
  #11  
ColeJJones's Avatar
Bannned
 
Joined: 09-08-07
Posts: 8,743
Likes: 0
From: Kaneohe, HI
Originally Posted by the_rainmaker
i'm not doubting that but he said he wanted the most power possible. and so far has that not been all turbo converted cars? I could be wrong but thats what i remember reading
yes turbo will get you the most hp

Originally Posted by 1badBlueberrySC
The TVS is capable of ALOT more than people think... you all will see here in the upcomming months!
i agree, but it wont beat a turbo's numbers. i hate to say that
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 03:26 PM
  #12  
1badBlueberrySC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-23-08
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
We'll see!
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 03:27 PM
  #13  
chris88z24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-07
Posts: 14,142
Likes: 71
From: NY
go turbo or go home
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 03:52 PM
  #14  
Pyros777's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 01-26-05
Posts: 3,418
Likes: 1
From: N/A
:goes home:

Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 04:06 PM
  #15  
SS/SCking's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-06
Posts: 5,747
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo, NY!!!
Why not make this fit Harop HTV 1900(1.9l) or the 2300(2.3l)

Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 04:35 PM
  #16  
YzRider452's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 11-29-06
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
LOL, a 2.3 supercharger on a 2.0.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 02:56 AM
  #17  
hossdeuce's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 07-23-07
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Glendale, AZ
Originally Posted by SS/SCking
Why not make this fit Harop HTV 1900(1.9l) or the 2300(2.3l)

damnit i wish i could get that to fit!

Originally Posted by ColeJJones
yes turbo will get you the most hp



i agree, but it wont beat a turbo's numbers. i hate to say that
i dont wanna convert my SUPERCHARGED beast for a whistleing turbo :P lol personally, turbos make me mad because SRT-4's stock are slower then my dads lifted excursion

Last edited by hossdeuce; Feb 10, 2009 at 02:56 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 03:00 AM
  #18  
cobaltSS2.4liter's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 05-17-07
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Millbrae
what about the twin screw supercharger?
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 03:07 AM
  #19  
ls1fbody's Avatar
Haz l33t wheelz.
 
Joined: 09-14-07
Posts: 18,883
Likes: 3
From: Costa Mesa CA
Originally Posted by SS/SCking
Why not make this fit Harop HTV 1900(1.9l) or the 2300(2.3l)

Why not? because i don't like watching my cylinder head do pushups off the block. 2.3L High Helix Blower..... *shakes head*....

Last edited by ls1fbody; Feb 10, 2009 at 03:09 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 05:50 AM
  #20  
Deathscythe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-28-06
Posts: 4,994
Likes: 0
From: Waldorf, MD
I thought the person making that quote was joking until I saw the pic. Think for a second... now,

Tell me what engine have you seen that has a displacement that is equaled by the output of the supercharger mounted to it? The new ZR1 has the eiher the 1.9L or the 2.3L tvs mounted to it, either of which represents roughly 1/3 the displacement of the engine. With the 1.32L tvs adapted to our cars, it accounts for more than half the displacement of the engine (2.0). I'd rather not fathom the parasitic loss that would be presented by trying to even spin a 2.3L blower for some kind of gain.

The unit that we have was designed with the smaller displacement engine blocks in mind. Efficiency and generous gains are the reason why many of us are using these now, and more are buying into it.

Last edited by Deathscythe; Feb 10, 2009 at 10:16 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 06:05 AM
  #21  
ajjaro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-09-08
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
From: Florida
tvs if you want a supercharger, if you want even more power, hahn level 5 turbo conversion, its twice the price tho
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 07:02 AM
  #22  
freakta's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-07
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
From: milton ma
why not keep the sc you have and throw a turbo on with it... thats made huge power also
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 10:20 AM
  #23  
Deathscythe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-28-06
Posts: 4,994
Likes: 0
From: Waldorf, MD
Two problems with that though.

1. To my knowledge, only two people have that setup on this forum, one being the chick from cobalt-addiction.com.

2. There really isn't any backing concerning that type of setup. I know the person that had the twincharged setup on his, and he was from the midwest, had problems with it, and got outside help from a tvs owner and tuner (imagine that) to try and get things right.

Too many issues and problems with a severely complicated powerplant that isn't necessary. A twincharged setup can be matched by a turboed one (06blackg85ss), and us with the tvs are going to try and push the numbers up to see where the ceiling actually is.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 11:06 AM
  #24  
cobaltss86's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-28-08
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 0
From: bedford, tx
just do turbo n supercharger
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 12:40 PM
  #25  
~Mike~'s Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 02-04-08
Posts: 4,613
Likes: 0
From: Wadsworth, OH
if cost isn't an issue, get the 2.0 race block and build it. If you don't want all that hassle, I agree with half the ppl in this thread...get the tvs. Twin charging is just a PITA to do, and even worse to tune. If you wanna make more power, go turbo. I think you should go the tvs route tho, everyone on here is looking to see what that thing can really do mounted up on our lsj's and tuned right.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:24 PM.