Meth Spray: fine most / heavy spray?
not sure....when i bought it from coolingmist i had to give him my estimated hp/tq and he was supposed to match it with the correct nozzle....i also suggested a 3gph nozzle as well since ive read that that is what most people are running. is there a way to tell?
i figure, when my car is being pushed that hard anyway, there is plenty of air passing through the intake and therefore the spray is instantaneously getting pulled into the supercharger, therefore making it almost necessary to have it spraying that hard in order to keep up with the airflow and gain the benefits of the kit....but still...seems like a lil much...
again, should it be a FINE spray? or heavy spray?
i figure, when my car is being pushed that hard anyway, there is plenty of air passing through the intake and therefore the spray is instantaneously getting pulled into the supercharger, therefore making it almost necessary to have it spraying that hard in order to keep up with the airflow and gain the benefits of the kit....but still...seems like a lil much...
again, should it be a FINE spray? or heavy spray?
Rodney over at AIS told me he recommends 6gph for our cars but I've never seen one in action (Bout to order mine this week) so did you put on a 3 or what size is the issue?
And how much of a spray are we talking?
And how much of a spray are we talking?
not sure....when i bought it from coolingmist i had to give him my estimated hp/tq and he was supposed to match it with the correct nozzle....i also suggested a 3gph nozzle as well since ive read that that is what most people are running. is there a way to tell?
i figure, when my car is being pushed that hard anyway, there is plenty of air passing through the intake and therefore the spray is instantaneously getting pulled into the supercharger, therefore making it almost necessary to have it spraying that hard in order to keep up with the airflow and gain the benefits of the kit....but still...seems like a lil much...
again, should it be a FINE spray? or heavy spray?
i figure, when my car is being pushed that hard anyway, there is plenty of air passing through the intake and therefore the spray is instantaneously getting pulled into the supercharger, therefore making it almost necessary to have it spraying that hard in order to keep up with the airflow and gain the benefits of the kit....but still...seems like a lil much...
again, should it be a FINE spray? or heavy spray?
Last edited by AIS; Mar 18, 2008 at 11:55 PM.
thanks! but would a 6 gph nozzle be a heavier/thicker spray and less of a mist? if so, it seems that that is what coolingmist supplied me with.... like i said before, it sprays heavy and reasonably thick in very quick spurts
all the mists from a nozzle should be a mist. the more gph, the more foggy, the less gph, the less foggy but both still a mist.
this video is 5gph, so compare it to that
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-ruWbOqICY
there are also a ton of other videos on youtube by coolingmist, just search, "coolingmist"
this video is 5gph, so compare it to that
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-ruWbOqICY
there are also a ton of other videos on youtube by coolingmist, just search, "coolingmist"
Just so everyone knows. Raven SS is going to be making somewhere in the neighborhood of 400-450 horsepower running the TVS supercharger on a built engine. Additionally, he's running the fully adjustable Stage 2 progressive system which allows him to dial flow out through the controller rather then changing nozzle tips. This allows him to run a slightly larger nozzle(s) arrangement since he's not limited to adjustments only at the nozzle.
Don't want everyone to be confused why Raven SS is running two number 6's. That would totally throw a wrench into the mix.
Rodney
We've found stock 12.5 psi engines to run number 6 nozzles just fine with a 50/50 mix. We no longer recommend number 3 nozzles as we found out it was not providing the full benefits. If a customer wants to run a number 3 nozzle thats fine. We simply will not guarantee the same results.
We have looked into this extensively. Not just with the Cobalt SS Eaton's but many other makes of positive displacement superchargers. Due to their inherit design and substantial surface area, these superchargers will require basically twice the jetting as a centrifugal for a equal horsepower range and boost setting.
This is merely are findings and suggestions. You do not have to follow our recommendations.
Rodney
We have looked into this extensively. Not just with the Cobalt SS Eaton's but many other makes of positive displacement superchargers. Due to their inherit design and substantial surface area, these superchargers will require basically twice the jetting as a centrifugal for a equal horsepower range and boost setting.
This is merely are findings and suggestions. You do not have to follow our recommendations.
Rodney
Just so everyone knows. Raven SS is going to be making somewhere in the neighborhood of 400-450 horsepower running the TVS supercharger on a built engine. Additionally, he's running the fully adjustable Stage 2 progressive system which allows him to dial flow out through the controller rather then changing nozzle tips. This allows him to run a slightly larger nozzle(s) arrangement since he's not limited to adjustments only at the nozzle.
Don't want everyone to be confused why Raven SS is running two number 6's. That would totally throw a wrench into the mix.
Rodney
Don't want everyone to be confused why Raven SS is running two number 6's. That would totally throw a wrench into the mix.
Rodney
We've found stock 12.5 psi engines to run number 6 nozzles just fine with a 50/50 mix. We no longer recommend number 3 nozzles as we found out it was not providing the full benefits. If a customer wants to run a number 3 nozzle thats fine. We simply will not guarantee the same results.
We have looked into this extensively. Not just with the Cobalt SS Eaton's but many other makes of positive displacement superchargers. Due to their inherit design and substantial surface area, these superchargers will require basically twice the jetting as a centrifugal for a equal horsepower range and boost setting.
This is merely are findings and suggestions. You do not have to follow our recommendations.
Rodney
We have looked into this extensively. Not just with the Cobalt SS Eaton's but many other makes of positive displacement superchargers. Due to their inherit design and substantial surface area, these superchargers will require basically twice the jetting as a centrifugal for a equal horsepower range and boost setting.
This is merely are findings and suggestions. You do not have to follow our recommendations.
Rodney
Rodney
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




