Front Page News Site Polls

Chevy Cobalt XFE Bests Segment, 36 mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 12, 2008 | 07:55 PM
  #1  
JonyyB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Site Founder
 
Joined: 03-17-04
Posts: 7,650
Likes: 2
From: NE OH Near Cleveland
Chevy Cobalt XFE Bests Segment, 36 mpg

How badly are fuel prices impacting car sales? So badly Chevy has gone under the hood of the Cobalt economy car and magically found 3 more mpg on the highway. Dubbed the XFE — Xtra Fuel Economy — the revised Cobalt is on sale now and delivers 25/36 mpg equipped with a manual transmission. The XFE replaces the base offering in both coupe and sedan versions of the LS and LT1 trim packages. Prices still start at $14,885.

Hitting the magical 36 mpg number propels the Cobalt XFE past the Honda Civic, Toyota Corolla and Ford Focus in terms of mileage for their manual transmission and represents a 9% gain in highway fuel efficiency. The Honda Civic with an automatic also gets 36 mpg.

How was the magic done? According to Chevy, “it uses revised engine calibration, low-rolling-resistance tires, a new, 3.74:1 final drive ratio and other technologies.” Meaning, they didn't have to do too much.

We’re glad automakers are adding more efficiency, but we’re not sure how we feel about slapping a special badge on what isn't a dramatically different vehicle. It will save confusion on the lot, though, where older 2008s that didn't receive the tweaks will look identical to the XFEs.
Source:
http://blogs.cars.com/kickingtires/2...obalt-xfe.html
Reply
Old May 12, 2008 | 07:57 PM
  #2  
XM15's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
From: CT
Hmm, I wonder what it would get with an intake and exhaust. I get numbers at or above that right now.
Reply
Old May 12, 2008 | 07:58 PM
  #3  
dman090's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 11-08-07
Posts: 6,041
Likes: 0
From: Huntington, Texas
i thought this was just an update on the computers of our vehicles?? my friend said he went to the local dealer and they reflashed his computer with XFE
Reply
Old May 12, 2008 | 08:53 PM
  #4  
DeftonesFan867's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-10-04
Posts: 7,059
Likes: 0
From: Henryville, PA
Originally Posted by dman090
i thought this was just an update on the computers of our vehicles?? my friend said he went to the local dealer and they reflashed his computer with XFE


XFE isn't a computer reflash. XFE is manual only and lower resistance tires.
Reply
Old May 12, 2008 | 08:59 PM
  #5  
LScoupeTUNER's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-07
Posts: 2,765
Likes: 0
From: Willoughby, Ohio
this whole thing just seems like a plot or something. haha. o well.
Reply
Old May 12, 2008 | 09:00 PM
  #6  
chevyLSchik's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-07-07
Posts: 8,512
Likes: 0
From: Auburn,WA
hey i get 36mpg...im an 05, automatic and i have crappy tires....sales pitch all the way on this one!
Reply
Old May 12, 2008 | 09:01 PM
  #7  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
that's what i get now. sometimes even higher but it's not a bad marketing ploy for people that don't know better, and majority of people complain about the gas prices. so they hear "better gas mileage" and they're all over it.
Reply
Old May 12, 2008 | 09:02 PM
  #8  
dman090's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 11-08-07
Posts: 6,041
Likes: 0
From: Huntington, Texas
right now i am getting 23.7 mpg...but i only drive about 5 miles a day so i stop and go at alot of redlights
Reply
Old May 12, 2008 | 09:02 PM
  #9  
chevyLSchik's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-07-07
Posts: 8,512
Likes: 0
From: Auburn,WA
i get around 28 in the city...more if im nice to my car i range between 33-38mpg on the hwy.
Reply
Old May 12, 2008 | 09:04 PM
  #10  
LScoupeTUNER's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-07
Posts: 2,765
Likes: 0
From: Willoughby, Ohio
in my old cobalt, i was getting about 22.4, but i was basically WOT all the time.
Reply
Old May 12, 2008 | 11:59 PM
  #11  
thefictionwelive's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 01-05-08
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
From: nowherevelli
I was able to get combined 30-33 mpg on the SS/SC before stage 2. Takes a bit more babying but I can still do 30mpg and maybe a bit above(if I could set the cruise at 60mph on the way to work lol). Even when I'm being peppy though I get 26-27 combined. They should just take the supercharger off the LSJ for an economic car, cause if you stay out of boost it does pretty good.
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 01:19 AM
  #12  
bigrroberto's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-30-06
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
From: Red Deer, Alberta
i get 38-40 right now on the hwy with my ss/sc (I can take pics and prove it)

keep your foot out of it!
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 09:15 AM
  #13  
Blue_Balt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-22-07
Posts: 6,179
Likes: 0
From: Howell, NJ
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
that's what i get now. sometimes even higher but it's not a bad marketing ploy for people that don't know better, and majority of people complain about the gas prices. so they hear "better gas mileage" and they're all over it.
Meh I know.

I have an 08 ls 5-spd and I can get that easily if I'm really light on the throttle.

Originally Posted by thefictionwelive
They should just take the supercharger off the LSJ for an economic car, cause if you stay out of boost it does pretty good.
Why didn't you just buy a 2.2 instead? Wouldn't taking the blower off the SS/SC defeat the purpose?

Last edited by Blue_Balt; May 13, 2008 at 09:15 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 02:50 PM
  #14  
thefictionwelive's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 01-05-08
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
From: nowherevelli
Originally Posted by bigrroberto
i get 38-40 right now on the hwy with my ss/sc (I can take pics and prove it)

keep your foot out of it!
what do you set the cruise at, I'm kinda doing an experiment right now to see how much I can get it up to. For the past 2 days I'm averaging 32.5 mpg so far. I've been trying to keep it 60-65. Cause when you look at it like this:

6mpgX12gallons on fill up = 72 additional miles out of the tank which would come out to a bit more than 2 gallons, rounded up to $4 a gallon where it is headed, filling up at least 6 times a month saves at least $56 bucks o,O.

Originally Posted by Blue_Balt
Meh I know.

I have an 08 ls 5-spd and I can get that easily if I'm really light on the throttle.



Why didn't you just buy a 2.2 instead? Wouldn't taking the blower off the SS/SC defeat the purpose?
I wasn't saying I would, I mean if I can get 32-33 mpg on a car with a blower....if it didn't have a blower it would make a great engine for an economy car.

Last edited by thefictionwelive; May 13, 2008 at 02:50 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 03:41 PM
  #15  
firemanfrank's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-07
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
From: USA
I used to get about 8mpg with a '69 Mach 1 that I had owned long ago (390).

Now, my Stage 2 SC gets almost 3 times that ... and it's faster.

That's good enough for me!
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 07:54 PM
  #16  
GTO 1's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-20-07
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Kilmarnock, Virginia
My Grand-Dad always said...... "People love to be fooled."

GTO 1
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 12:35 PM
  #17  
umrdyldo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-06-06
Posts: 11,663
Likes: 65
From: MO
Maybe they are trying to sell more manual cars.
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 12:44 PM
  #18  
Wild Balt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-14-06
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
From: Houston
To sell more manual cars, you'll need more people learning to drive stick or willing to use it in traffic. They aren't very well favored in cities, I know.

And if they were wanting to increase the economy of the cobalt since its an economy car, what about having an Aveo XFE since its cheaper than the Cobalt?
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 12:51 PM
  #19  
alleycat58's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-08-05
Posts: 18,529
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh
LOL @ marketing ploy. 36mpg is me driving on the highway at 70 in my SS/SC.
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 01:42 PM
  #20  
Wild Balt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-14-06
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
From: Houston
And what are low roll resistance tires? Isn't that what all tires do? Roll? Unless they're flat...
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 02:16 PM
  #21  
umrdyldo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-06-06
Posts: 11,663
Likes: 65
From: MO
Well technically they could have less resistance, but that would probably mean less traction and stopping power
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 05:32 PM
  #22  
chris06ss's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-10-07
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: cape cod ma
i get 30 on the highway all the time and i drive 3 hours to new hampshire and it is only a 1/4 tank of gas
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 05:35 PM
  #23  
joeworkstoohard's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-21-06
Posts: 5,577
Likes: 3
From: Gainesville, FL
it's all about the RATING, not what the car actually gets.
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 05:35 PM
  #24  
SpdDemon69's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-12-08
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
well in a few years....car makes must average at least 35 mpg i think it was....meaning all the cars of a make combined have to average a EPA MPG of 35 mpg.....so i guess chevy is starting early.

plus 4 dollars a gallon is bull****
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 02:59 PM
  #25  
Helltime's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-01-07
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
From: Des Moines, IA
If chevy was smart and wanted to up thier average mpg as a car maker they would just bring back the metro. My dad bought one new back in 2000 when he had to start commuting (vs his truck, it was actually cheap to buy the metro then put gas in the truck....and thats when it was only $1.50-1.70 a gallon lol) and he got best of 48 mpg a couple times and averaged 46-47 on the highway all the time and 43 in town. Answer me why when the metro could to that back then, everyone is praising hybrid technology now when it doesn't do much better? I would rather drive a metro then a ******* prius any day.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:09 AM.