Front Page News Site Polls

GM tightens up usage of SS label

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 06:54 PM
  #26  
Red07SSNA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-08-06
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 2
From: *
Originally Posted by g5mike
this is why I prefer my car being called "GT"
OK g5mike....go back to your cam thread and tell us about your GT!!!!
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 06:58 PM
  #27  
xtremeGM's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-21-05
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted by g5mike
this is why I prefer my car being called "GT"
Pontiac would never call one of their new vehicles an SS they have always stuck with the SE GT GT1 GTP GXP for any of their recent models. SS is like Pontiac putting GXP on everything which they wouldn't do
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 06:58 PM
  #28  
Evilfrog's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-22-05
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 1
From: Alton IL
Originally Posted by marerick007
No, I meant a link to the artical the OP quoted.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 06:59 PM
  #29  
CobaltSS422's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-16-05
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo, NY
Originally Posted by Evilfrog
The 2.2 ecotec was never as fast as the 2.4 used in the last model of Z24. And the the Z24 did not come from the fact that it was a 2.4L. My girlfriend had a 92(3?) z24 with a 3.1L engine in it.
i stand corrected

never said it was faster.. my mistake.. the old 2.4L made 160 hp and the 2.2L ecotec made 150hp... your gf had, what is now a 14 yr old car.. i believe they phased that motor out of the cavaliers and used it in the grand prix's.. i was speaking current when the transition started to take place of getting rid of the old style 2.4L
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 07:01 PM
  #30  
marerick007's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-30-06
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 0
From: Langley AFB, VA
Originally Posted by Evilfrog
No, I meant a link to the artical the OP quoted.
Well be more specific next time silly!
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 07:04 PM
  #31  
Evilfrog's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-22-05
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 1
From: Alton IL
Originally Posted by CobaltSS422

never said it was faster..
Sorry; misread that part.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 07:13 PM
  #32  
207GT04's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 12-17-05
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
yeah i think the silverado could be worth of an SS badge with a blower though, i mean none of the other fast truck have came with four wheel drive which would make that truck utterly sick! but its just way under powered to compete with an SRT10. personally i think stick with the impala, monte carlo, silverado, an SS/SC cobalt, everything else is just plain obnoxious
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 08:03 PM
  #33  
Red07SSNA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-08-06
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 2
From: *
I think some are missing the big picture. Saying that only the SS/SC deserves the SS emblem is like saying the SS350s of old shouldn't have had the SS badges -- only the SS454s should have had them. The SS badge denotes a performance version of a particular model. Performance not only of the straight line variety but also pylon racing, road racing, etc. I can assure you, there were Malibus in the old days that came with 350 4-barrel carbs that would wip the crap out of an SS350 car. Those Malibu owners just knew how to properly order a car with the right combination of parts.

Last edited by Red07SSNA; Dec 15, 2006 at 09:43 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 08:17 PM
  #34  
TCarter's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-16-06
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
From: Sterling, IL
All I can say is, if its true, my 2.4L SS Sedan is a rare car, and will increase its value!

Thank you GM! (Seriously)
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 08:46 PM
  #35  
xtremeGM's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-21-05
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted by Cobalter LS
I think some are missing the big picture. Saying that only the SS/SC deserves the SS emblem is like saying the SS350s of old shouldn't have had the SS badges -- only the SS454s should have had them. The SS badge denotes a performance version of a particular model. Performance not only of the straight line variety but also pylon racing, road racing, etc. I can assure you, there were Malibus in the old days that came with 350 4-barrel cars that would wip the crap out of an SS350 car. Those Malibu owners just knew how to properly order a car with the right combination of parts.
I defiantly don't think that only the Cobalt SS/SC deserves it. They are other vehicles and there should be other vehicles that have the SS badge. But those vehicles should have the performance to back them up the Malibu SS offered less horsepower than the G6 GTP. It should have had the label Malibu sport or something else but not SS.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 09:09 PM
  #36  
BLKblurr06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 0
From: Reynoldsburg, Ohio
Originally Posted by an0malous
Z24 would have seemed far more appropriate.
or how about an "S24"
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 09:13 PM
  #37  
BLKblurr06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 0
From: Reynoldsburg, Ohio
Originally Posted by Cobalter LS
I think some are missing the big picture. Saying that only the SS/SC deserves the SS emblem is like saying the SS350s of old shouldn't have had the SS badges -- only the SS454s should have had them. The SS badge denotes a performance version of a particular model. Performance not only of the straight line variety but also pylon racing, road racing, etc. I can assure you, there were Malibus in the old days that came with 350 4-barrel cars that would wip the crap out of an SS350 car. Those Malibu owners just knew how to properly order a car with the right combination of parts.
no, but you may be missing the point, dont let this thread turn ghey.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 09:16 PM
  #38  
BLKblurr06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 0
From: Reynoldsburg, Ohio
Originally Posted by CobaltSS422
i stand corrected

never said it was faster.. my mistake.. the old 2.4L made 160 hp and the 2.2L ecotec made 150hp... your gf had, what is now a 14 yr old car.. i believe they phased that motor out of the cavaliers and used it in the grand prix's.. i was speaking current when the transition started to take place of getting rid of the old style 2.4L
the 2.4L made 150hp and the eco made 140hp
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 09:27 PM
  #39  
joeworkstoohard's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-21-06
Posts: 5,577
Likes: 3
From: Gainesville, FL
okay, lets break this down.

number one, the malibu nameplate has as much right to an SS model as any other. most chevelle SS cars were just stripped out malibus, but you could order both the malibu and SS packs on the chevelle, if you liked.

saying that the number of doors matters is just silly. or that there can't be a wagon.

you COULD call the 2.4 the RS, but that would be silly. tradition follows RS and SS both being only appearance groups.

the first car to have the super sport name was a corvette, so get off of that one as well. the reason it may never be called an SS is because that super sport corvette is A car, one car. and chev might not want to tarnish that. they may call it a grand sport, however.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 09:47 PM
  #40  
Red07SSNA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-08-06
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 2
From: *
Originally Posted by BLKblurr06
no, but you may be missing the point, dont let this thread turn ghey.
OK. Chevy has a right to the SS moniker and they can put it on ANYTHING they want to! You just don't have to buy it if you don't like it. AND THAT IS THE POINT!!!!!!!!
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 09:48 PM
  #41  
red_wing_2121's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
From: Sterling Heights, MI
So this means that there will not be a Cobalt 2.2L SS in the future?






















Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 09:54 PM
  #42  
vtecduster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-27-06
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn Park, MN
I'd say good for them on a good decision..instead I will say "about goddamned time"
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 09:56 PM
  #43  
Red07SSNA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-08-06
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 2
From: *
Originally Posted by red_wing_2121
So this means that there will not be a Cobalt 2.2L SS in the future?

That's a good one.....
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 10:11 PM
  #44  
G5GT2007's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-05-06
Posts: 3,516
Likes: 0
From: CT
i think the Cobalt SS N/A should just be called Sport. if they came out with the Z24 im sure you will here a ton of morons saying something like oh its back to the shity cavalier names. or something gay like that. so i think Sport is the best one for it.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 10:18 PM
  #45  
plyboy-illest's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-05
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 0
From: Toronto (woodbridge)
this is good news cuz it seems every new car gm comes out with now is getting the SS badge on it...
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 10:19 PM
  #46  
css9450's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-29-06
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 1
From: Glen Ellyn, Illinois
Originally Posted by Cobalter LS
OK. Chevy has a right to the SS moniker and they can put it on ANYTHING they want to!
Very true!

Its all so stupid arguing about this; the V8 guys hate seeing 4-cyls with the SS badge, the SS/SC guys hate seeing the 2.4 cars with the SS badge, and everyone hates the Malibus with the SS badge. Its like everyone's manhood is being threatened whenever a "less-deserving" car is badged as an SS. I suppose next we'll be having posts calling for non-appropriate SSs to be recalled and re-badged as RS or whatever.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 10:23 PM
  #47  
JakeU's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 09-19-06
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: New Westminster, BC
Whew! Good thing I locked myself in the Cobalt history books with the 2.4, before my SS got taken away.

"Oh, my god, you killed my SS! You bastards!"
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 10:28 PM
  #48  
Red07SSNA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-08-06
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 2
From: *
Originally Posted by JakeU
Whew! Good thing I locked myself in the Cobalt history books with the 2.4, before my SS got taken away.

"Oh, my god, you killed my SS! You bastards!"
That's right....you better lock up your 2.4...the self appointed "SS police" will be coming to take away your SS emblems
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 10:38 PM
  #49  
JakeU's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 09-19-06
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: New Westminster, BC
Originally Posted by Cobalter LS
That's right....you better lock up your 2.4...the self appointed "SS police" will be coming to take away your SS emblems
I guess the next step is to put a Turbo in it so I can call it SS Turbo (SS/T) and I shall again be worthy of the SS name.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 11:07 PM
  #50  
LSCobaltlover05's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-22-06
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
From: Maryland / Orlando
Ya the 2.4SS probably will be worth something one day... if they are kept all stock

But i think the SS should only be put on the top of the line cars in a company, and not just a top of the line car in a model.

And also there are way too many models of cars anyway, like when the Cobalt first came out it was like the base, LS, sedan, and SS... then the next year there was LT and LZ and all this other stuff, i think that makes it too confusing to consumers...
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:25 AM.