Fuel Economy - Hypermiling Dedicated to discussions on fuel economy improvements and related modifications.

Discussion: best method

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2011, 09:56 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
utsadude's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-31-08
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Discussion: best method

So thus is something I've been thinking on for s while and never remember to test.

When you're trying to preserve that lovely precious liquid in the tank, what's best?

Putting around waiting to get to your desired speed?

Or hauling a little ass and getting where you want to faster then coasting?



This question is mindfucking me. So please give me some opinions.
Old 05-31-2011, 09:57 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
utsadude's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-31-08
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Drunk and only one spelling error. I call that a win.
Old 05-31-2011, 09:57 PM
  #3  
AWD > FWD
iTrader: (2)
 
TommyP's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-18-09
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Posts: 11,122
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I've found that if you slowly accelerate for a long time, you put the engine under load for a longer amount of time, wasting more fuel. It works better for me just to get up to speed, and go the speed limit.
Old 05-31-2011, 09:57 PM
  #4  
Vtec Rep
Platinum Member
 
BPacak's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-11-09
Location: Parma, OH
Posts: 27,905
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
lower rpms, more miles.
Old 05-31-2011, 10:00 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Sunburst's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-30-11
Location: Ohio
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TommypSS/TC
I've found that if you slowly accelerate for a long time, you put the engine under load for a longer amount of time, wasting more fuel. It works better for me just to get up to speed, and go the speed limit.
^ this.
Old 05-31-2011, 10:01 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
utsadude's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-31-08
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TommypSS/TC
I've found that if you slowly accelerate for a long time, you put the engine under load for a longer amount of time, wasting more fuel. It works better for me just to get up to speed, and go the speed limit.
This is what I have always thought.
Old 05-31-2011, 10:02 PM
  #7  
Vtec Rep
Platinum Member
 
BPacak's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-11-09
Location: Parma, OH
Posts: 27,905
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ive always thought lower rpms, less gas being used.

also no boost means less gas being used.
Old 05-31-2011, 11:50 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
06SS ALL DAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-01-08
Location: Philthydelphia, PA
Posts: 4,793
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
just get up to the speed limit and your fine. From a stop and accelerating as long as you don't go into boost, thats the best way your going to conserve fuel. That or take public transportation or walk if your only going to the corner store lol.
Old 06-01-2011, 11:09 AM
  #9  
Platinum Member
 
themacguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-24-10
Location: Canada's Capital
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Gentle acceleration off the line then shift @ 2500 RPM. No boost = reasonable mileage.

Boring but frugal.
Old 06-05-2011, 06:55 AM
  #10  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
black67's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-14-09
Location: Medina, Ohio
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What works for me is to shift around 2500-3000 rpm's in each gear. Even lower works in the higher gears. If you are going to be cruising around 50 mph or so, put it in 5th. Just don't stap the gas when you want to go. On my daily drive, I am averaging 29 mpg.

Try and keeping the boost low helps too. Going the speed limit helps too. I have noticed with mine, that if I go over about 74 mph on a long trip, it goes south fast. The best that my car has done was 37 mpg doing 68 mph with the air on.

Also, have your windows up. Use the areodynamics of the car. Have the a/c on low. The newer cars are made to run like this on the highway.
Old 06-06-2011, 11:43 AM
  #11  
Member
 
toolman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-06-08
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by utsadude
So thus is something I've been thinking on for s while and never remember to test.

When you're trying to preserve that lovely precious liquid in the tank, what's best?

Putting around waiting to get to your desired speed?

Or hauling a little ass and getting where you want to faster then coasting?




This question is mindfucking me. So please give me some opinions.
In my opinion, somewhere in between is the sweet spot. If you accelerate too fast, you're just wasting gas. If you accelerate too slowly, you'll always have a load on the engine and it will take a lot longer before you can let off the gas.

Generally, I accelerate more slowly than the traffic around me and I shift around 2300-2500. If I am going up a hill, I'll shift around 3000. If I am going down a hill, I'll shift around 2000.

If I am cruising around town at 35 mph, I'll leave it in 4th gear. Any faster, and I'll shift into 5th.

There are two things that rape my fuel economy. The main one is wind, and the second is speed.

I hope this helps you out. You know our cars are identical...
Old 06-30-2011, 10:30 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
xxxxsh4d0wxxxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-22-08
Location: New Lenox, Illinois
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by toolman
In my opinion, somewhere in between is the sweet spot. If you accelerate too fast, you're just wasting gas. If you accelerate too slowly, you'll always have a load on the engine and it will take a lot longer before you can let off the gas.

Generally, I accelerate more slowly than the traffic around me and I shift around 2300-2500. If I am going up a hill, I'll shift around 3000. If I am going down a hill, I'll shift around 2000.

If I am cruising around town at 35 mph, I'll leave it in 4th gear. Any faster, and I'll shift into 5th.

There are two things that rape my fuel economy. The main one is wind, and the second is speed.

I hope this helps you out. You know our cars are identical...
Talk about load.. Definitely too low of a gear for the speed. I don't care what anyone says. I only use 5th when I am at 50 or above. You are bogging the motor hardcore if you're going 38mph in 5th.
Old 07-01-2011, 12:10 PM
  #13  
Member
 
toolman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-06-08
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by xxxxsh4d0wxxxx
Talk about load.. Definitely too low of a gear for the speed. I don't care what anyone says. I only use 5th when I am at 50 or above. You are bogging the motor hardcore if you're going 38mph in 5th.
Only if you are trying to accelerate or drive up an incline. I've noticed a little bogging with a stiff head wind, but I'd hardly call it "hardcore".

Maybe the difference is in our engines. How does the low-end torque in my mostly-stock 2.4 compare to the low-end torque of your 2.0 SC with a long-tube header?
Old 07-02-2011, 02:05 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
xxxxsh4d0wxxxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-22-08
Location: New Lenox, Illinois
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by toolman
Only if you are trying to accelerate or drive up an incline. I've noticed a little bogging with a stiff head wind, but I'd hardly call it "hardcore".

Maybe the difference is in our engines. How does the low-end torque in my mostly-stock 2.4 compare to the low-end torque of your 2.0 SC with a long-tube header?
No I agree, I thought about it and 100% agree only if going up-hill. If you're just cruising along it would be fine I think, just don't use 5th to pass anyone when you're going that slow!
Old 07-02-2011, 02:49 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Malaclypse's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-29-05
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by utsadude
So thus is something I've been thinking on for s while and never remember to test.

When you're trying to preserve that lovely precious liquid in the tank, what's best?

Putting around waiting to get to your desired speed?

Or hauling a little ass and getting where you want to faster then coasting?

This question is mindfucking me. So please give me some opinions.
Somewhere in-between is best. Stay out of boost but don't take your time to get to the speed limit.

5th gear is useless until you hit 45 - 50 mph.

I can't really say anything becaust I averaged 17 mpg on my last tank of premium.
Old 07-05-2011, 03:09 PM
  #16  
Banned
 
Tstonee's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-23-11
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Get to speed quick and stay in the highest gear.
Old 08-25-2011, 10:15 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
StevoElSupremo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-01-10
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 5,875
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts
I think the 2.4 does better under really low end load. because I can putt around 1300RPM in my 2.4 just fine, but my buddies 2.0S/C feels bogged at that RPM.
Old 08-25-2011, 10:25 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
freakta's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-22-07
Location: milton ma
Posts: 5,578
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its all in the throttle control. i like to stay out of boost around 10 to 15 on the negative side
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fallen33
Show & Shine
47
03-20-2007 04:35 PM
PpAzZ1101
2.4L LE5 Performance Tech
20
04-25-2006 07:53 AM
GSoccer24
Appearance
5
04-23-2006 07:40 PM
JonyyB
General Cobalt
6
12-07-2004 12:01 AM



Quick Reply: Discussion: best method



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 AM.