General Cobalt General Cobalt, Pursuit, and Ion talk. Post specific discussions in the forums below

2.2L Vs. 2.4L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 02:31 AM
  #1  
Onyxd04Redline's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 06-11-07
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
From: Az
2.2L Vs. 2.4L

I've always wondered. What are the big differences between the 2.2L and the 2.4L besides displacement. Are the 2.4L internals stronger? Details please
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 02:37 AM
  #2  
BigTizzle903's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-28-07
Posts: 3,186
Likes: 0
From: Middletown, NY
Originally Posted by Onyxd04Redline
I've always wondered. What are the big differences between the 2.2L and the 2.4L besides displacement. Are the 2.4L internals stronger? Details please
x2!!
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 04:49 AM
  #3  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
the L61 uses a 10.0:1 compression ratio and is obviously .2 liters smaller. The LE5 has more displacement, uses a 10.4:1 compression ratio, and has a VVT head. Thats really it. I think the 2.4 uses either stronger pistons or stronger rods, but not both. I can't remember which tho.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 05:07 AM
  #4  
NJHK's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-05-06
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 2
From: East Brunswick, NJ
Originally Posted by HunterKiller89
the L61 uses a 10.0:1 compression ratio and is obviously .2 liters smaller. The LE5 has more displacement, uses a 10.4:1 compression ratio, and has a VVT head. Thats really it. I think the 2.4 uses either stronger pistons or stronger rods, but not both. I can't remember which tho.
what he said.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 05:24 AM
  #5  
Brandon97Z's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-13-04
Posts: 3,394
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
The 2.4 also has the Gen II block as well as the oil squirters for the pistons. But i think the 08 2.2's are getting the Gen II block as well.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 05:25 AM
  #6  
Witt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-06
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
The nitty gritty of it is not only the VVT and displacement but the longer stroke adding additional crank leverage for peak torque at a faster engine speed.

Along with VVT, the 2.4L also has slightly more aggressive cams, higher compression and a more aggressive timing map.

Engine management is vastly different.

GM is now listing somewhat conflicting information about the LE5 connecting rod limitations. LE5 internals were believed to be stronger as evident by GM's powertrain data on their website (forged connecting rods more specifically). However recently published GM Performance data indicates 2.4L connecting rod failure point as the same as the 2.2L which may indicate a misprint on the powertrain website.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 05:26 AM
  #7  
Onyxd04Redline's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 06-11-07
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
From: Az
Witt,

I think you're the smartest man on this forum
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 05:29 AM
  #8  
REIGN SS's Avatar
Original Hayden Fanatic
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 05-06-06
Posts: 33,169
Likes: 1
From: Dayton, O HI O
Originally Posted by Onyxd04Redline
Witt,

I think you're the smartest man on this forum
I agree, he is one of the smartest members on the site.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 05:35 AM
  #9  
Witt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-06
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by Onyxd04Redline
Witt,

I think you're the smartest man on this forum
I speak for a group of us. Like the Borg, the Pittsburgh ecotec group is nothing but a collective of information and broken parts.

Srsly tho, I just like to tear **** apart on cars.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 05:45 AM
  #10  
M-Dub's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-19-05
Posts: 9,704
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Witt, you and your group (and they know who they are too) are just way too modest.

You guys have helped many of us far more than we would ever be able to repay! Well cept Area I can do what I can for him, and I know he's just one of the members of your brain trust!

I for one thank you!
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 05:46 AM
  #11  
Jackalope's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 1
From: here
The 2.4 also has cast rods vs the powdered rods of a 2.2. The 2.4 also has a forged crank I believe.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 09:44 AM
  #12  
Onyxd04Redline's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 06-11-07
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
From: Az
Witt,

Do you have a hot member like 7 of nine?
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 06:18 PM
  #13  
Red07SSNA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-08-06
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 2
From: *
Intake and exhaust manifolds are different - bigger/better flow capability on 2.4.
TB on 2.2 is 60MM
TB on 2.4 is 68MM
Freer flowing exhaust system on 2.4 -- DP/cat-back

2.2 Auto Tranny has 3.63 final drive
2.4 Auto Tranny has 3.91 final drive
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 06:23 PM
  #14  
elecblue06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-19-07
Posts: 14,901
Likes: 1
From: newburgh,ny
tuning .. has no one really said that yet
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 06:33 PM
  #15  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
remember kids. the spark plugs are only good to 300hp





















yea. don't shoot me. im just the messenger

lawl
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 04:50 AM
  #16  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by elecblue06
tuning .. has no one really said that yet
actually, your like the 4th to say it...so yea....

Originally Posted by NJHK
what he said.
ive learnded so much!
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 10:55 AM
  #17  
elecblue06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-19-07
Posts: 14,901
Likes: 1
From: newburgh,ny
Originally Posted by HunterKiller89
actually, your like the 4th to say it...so yea....



ive learnded so much!
where? i looked again and still dont see it
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 04:49 AM
  #18  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by elecblue06
where? i looked again and still dont see it
Originally Posted by Witt
The nitty gritty of it is not only the VVT and displacement but the longer stroke adding additional crank leverage for peak torque at a faster engine speed.

Along with VVT, the 2.4L also has slightly more aggressive cams, higher compression and a more aggressive timing map.

Engine management is vastly different.
i was kinda exadurating btw, but Witt did mention it lol
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 09:50 AM
  #19  
TheSilentFart's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 10-17-07
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by Jackalope
The 2.4 also has cast rods vs the powdered rods of a 2.2. The 2.4 also has a forged crank I believe.
LE5 does not have a forged crank, it's cast.

Up until 2007, the L61 didn't have a coil-on-plug ignition system like the LE5.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 11:32 AM
  #20  
Jackalope's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 1
From: here
Originally Posted by TheSilentFart
LE5 does not have a forged crank, it's cast.

Up until 2007, the L61 didn't have a coil-on-plug ignition system like the LE5.
Oh wow thanks you! I went back and re-read the GM spec sheet for the 2.4 and your right. The crank is cast nodular iron, its the rods that are forged steel.

Click the link...http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...tec/08_LE5.xls


I'm fighting the flu you'll have to forgive me a mistake or 2, its the meds.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 12:11 PM
  #21  
TheSilentFart's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 10-17-07
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by Jackalope
Oh wow thanks you! I went back and re-read the GM spec sheet for the 2.4 and your right. The crank is cast nodular iron, its the rods that are forged steel.

Click the link...http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...tec/08_LE5.xls


I'm fighting the flu you'll have to forgive me a mistake or 2, its the meds.
Not a problem. Didn't mean it in a mean way. Just wanted to correct it.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 12:20 PM
  #22  
Jackalope's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 1
From: here
Originally Posted by TheSilentFart
Not a problem. Didn't mean it in a mean way. Just wanted to correct it.
Oh no dude I know that! I wasn't answering to be a smart ass I was really saying THANK YOU for your help. **** noone can be right 100% of the time, no one! And if you think you are I challange you to walk on water!
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 12:21 PM
  #23  
Projekt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-07
Posts: 24,270
Likes: 1
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
thats why i like u jack, first time i was on this forum i saw you where wrong on something and you maned up to it insted of calling the dude a jackass

hope you get better from your flu!
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 12:27 PM
  #24  
Jackalope's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 1
From: here
Originally Posted by Projekt
thats why i like u jack, first time i was on this forum i saw you where wrong on something and you maned up to it insted of calling the dude a jackass

hope you get better from your flu!
Thanks man, so do I! And seriously anyone, AND I DO MEAN ANYONE who can't admit to being wrong from time to time is a complete ass!

The only person I know of in history to never be wrong died almost 2000 years ago, since then noone else has walked on water. Well not with out some stupid floaty shoes!
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 12:28 PM
  #25  
TheSilentFart's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 10-17-07
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by Jackalope
Oh no dude I know that! I wasn't answering to be a smart ass I was really saying THANK YOU for your help. **** noone can be right 100% of the time, no one! And if you think you are I challange you to walk on water!
Haha... no I was just clarifying before anyone else jumped in and took it the wrong way. Internet = overly sensitive.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:05 PM.