b&m or hurst?
i have the b&m shifter, easy install, matches my interior well, and its shifts feel firm and precise. i love it and i recommend it. im sure someone who has the hurst will chime in soon
I was all set to go Hurst but I'm going to wait for the Ark
bump
Last edited by Inferno; Mar 5, 2008 at 08:35 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
I got the B&M, I think its great. Only gripe with it is, if its cold outside that shifter stays like an ice cube for a while. Other than that though it knocked almost 2 tenths off my 1/4 mile time.
Okay talk to owners of both. They are both awesome. They both have the same pros (shorter shifts, better looks, etc) as well as cons (cold in the cold, hot in the hot weather, etc). It just basically comes down to price (usually really close but occasionally you will see one or the other on sale) or personal preference (ie I prefer Hurst because I like the round knob instead of the B&M irregularly shaped knob).
Neither is any 'better' than the other. /thread
Neither is any 'better' than the other. /thread
me and my buddy both have the B&M, and we both broke a set of shift linkages with some hard shifting...the stock shifter shaft hits the square hole when you shift gears, the B&M shortens the throw so its possible to shift too hard and not have that sort-of mechanical stop, which slams the linkage in too far. I've read posts on here of others that have done the same...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



