Car and Driver Lightning Laps
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: 08-02-05
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: London
Car and Driver Lightning Laps
LL1 - Under $30k
LL2 - $30k-$60k
LL3 - $60k-$120k
LL4 - $120k-$240k
LL5 - $240k+
The results are posted in lap time/avg speed.
LL1 in Finishing order:
1. Nissan 350Z Track - 3:12.5/78.5
2. Mitsu EVO MR - 3:13.5/78.1
3. Mazda RX8 - 3:19.0/76.0
4. Chevy Cobalt SS - 3:20.6/75.4
5. Ford Mustang GT - 3:20.9/75.3
6. Volkswagen GTI - 3:25.1/73.7
7. Honda Civic Si - 3:26.5/73.2
8. Mazda MX5 - 3:29.3/72.2
LL2 in Finishing order:
1. Lotus Elise - 3:09.2/79.9
2. Chevy Corvette - 3:09.3/79.9
3. Porsche Cayman S - 3:09.5/79.8
4. Ford Shelby GT500 - 3:11.0/79.2
5. Charger SRT8 - 3:18.2/76.3
LL3 in Finishing order:
1. Corvette Z06 - 3:01.1/83.5
2. Viper SRT10 Coupe - 3:01.6/83.3
3. BMW M6 - 3:10.0/79.6
LL4 in Finishing order:
1. Ford GT - 3:00.7/83.7
(if this is a repost ..just delete it ...I havn't been on here much)
LL2 - $30k-$60k
LL3 - $60k-$120k
LL4 - $120k-$240k
LL5 - $240k+
The results are posted in lap time/avg speed.
LL1 in Finishing order:
1. Nissan 350Z Track - 3:12.5/78.5
2. Mitsu EVO MR - 3:13.5/78.1
3. Mazda RX8 - 3:19.0/76.0
4. Chevy Cobalt SS - 3:20.6/75.4
5. Ford Mustang GT - 3:20.9/75.3
6. Volkswagen GTI - 3:25.1/73.7
7. Honda Civic Si - 3:26.5/73.2
8. Mazda MX5 - 3:29.3/72.2
LL2 in Finishing order:
1. Lotus Elise - 3:09.2/79.9
2. Chevy Corvette - 3:09.3/79.9
3. Porsche Cayman S - 3:09.5/79.8
4. Ford Shelby GT500 - 3:11.0/79.2
5. Charger SRT8 - 3:18.2/76.3
LL3 in Finishing order:
1. Corvette Z06 - 3:01.1/83.5
2. Viper SRT10 Coupe - 3:01.6/83.3
3. BMW M6 - 3:10.0/79.6
LL4 in Finishing order:
1. Ford GT - 3:00.7/83.7
(if this is a repost ..just delete it ...I havn't been on here much)
haha j/k
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: 08-02-05
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: London
Originally Posted by Serpico
i wonder where it would be with the gmpp stage 2 kit...surely ahead of the mazda ....maybe ahead of the nissan, well maybe
maybe .. but I doubt it would drop 7.5 seconds ...
look at the drivetrain layouts of the top cars ... I think thats where the cobat is getting hurt ... not in the power department ...(take a look at the average speed....not that far off)
Senior Member
Joined: 07-19-05
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
From: Miamisburg, OH
I read the article, they were very impressed with the SS/SC. I think its funny that we were in the 30k and under class, and every car we were behind, and one we were ahead of, was well over 30k as tested!
Senior Member
Joined: 08-28-05
Posts: 4,368
Likes: 0
From: Socal
Originally Posted by KillerNutz
I read the article, they were very impressed with the SS/SC. I think its funny that we were in the 30k and under class, and every car we were behind, and one we were ahead of, was well over 30k as tested!
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: 08-02-05
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: London
Originally Posted by RedlineBrian
That's quite impressive for the cobalt seeing as how all teh cars before it were either AWD or RWD. Good job Cobalt.
and the cobalt was the least expensive out of all the cars tested so far
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Getaway_Driver
Problems/Service/Maintenance
41
Sep 8, 2015 09:41 AM