Cobalt handling and performance
Cobalt handling and performance
1.I have 98 eclipse turbo and i am considering trading it in for a cobalt, rsx, celica. I was just wondering how well th cobalt handles and how quick it is. you guys all own one so i figured you would know.
2. also..is it worth gettin a cobalt LS ? I intend on moding my car too., the SS is hard to find and possibly a lil over my buget. thanks guys
2. also..is it worth gettin a cobalt LS ? I intend on moding my car too., the SS is hard to find and possibly a lil over my buget. thanks guys
Originally Posted by Shift20
1.I have 98 eclipse turbo and i am considering trading it in for a cobalt, rsx, celica. I was just wondering how well th cobalt handles and how quick it is. you guys all own one so i figured you would know.
2. also..is it worth gettin a cobalt LS ? I intend on moding my car too., the SS is hard to find and possibly a lil over my buget. thanks guys
2. also..is it worth gettin a cobalt LS ? I intend on moding my car too., the SS is hard to find and possibly a lil over my buget. thanks guys
The price difference is small to get to the 2.4L SS.
Coming from that eclipse I would say get the 2.0 SS/SC. If it doesn't have the G85 you might be able to work them as low as 18K. I've seen them being sold for 17K. The suspension on the SS/SC is great. I've taken onramps at 60 before and held like a champ with no tire squeal.
If you really want to get into modding the car, you can always get the 2.4 NA SS and make a turbo project out of it. Tuning is out for that car so the only thing stopping you is money.
If you really want to get into modding the car, you can always get the 2.4 NA SS and make a turbo project out of it. Tuning is out for that car so the only thing stopping you is money.
My friend has an RSX-S, and between our two cars, the cobalt is definitely faster (stock), and would go faster on a road course. The LS is not a performance car. At least go for the 2.4L SS if you want performance.
i disagree with the statements being made about the LS, i think its a kinda speedy car (off the line). i have driven my bro's celica and i can tell you that i found my LS more enjoyable to drive.
i agree that the SS models ("SS" and "SS Supercharged") are the superior car, but for the price difference between a SS and a LS, you could easily spend less than $500 to beef up the suspension. theres a few intakes and cat-backs available, not many headers still though.
WS Fraizer had the best idea though, take em all for a drive.
i agree that the SS models ("SS" and "SS Supercharged") are the superior car, but for the price difference between a SS and a LS, you could easily spend less than $500 to beef up the suspension. theres a few intakes and cat-backs available, not many headers still though.
WS Fraizer had the best idea though, take em all for a drive.
if u intend on modding, get the 2.0 s/c... the 2.4 has been getting shafted with aftermarket support (mostly), although HPtuners just released their support for it.
in reality, if a 2.0 is out of ur budget, how are u going to afford the substantial modifications that it will take to make a 2.2 even catch up to s/c-forget the fact of going faster.. bc once u turbo the 2.2 to get it to go as fast as a stock 2.0, now u gotta build motor.. crazy $$$. not good for some1 on a budget
a 2.2 is quick off the line to what? 30mph? (im sorry just bustin *****
)
if ur really interested in modding i would recommend the 2.0, or at least the 2.4. it doesnt seem like ur exactly loaded (like me) so starting off with the faster car with more aftermarket support is the right way to go
in reality, if a 2.0 is out of ur budget, how are u going to afford the substantial modifications that it will take to make a 2.2 even catch up to s/c-forget the fact of going faster.. bc once u turbo the 2.2 to get it to go as fast as a stock 2.0, now u gotta build motor.. crazy $$$. not good for some1 on a budget
a 2.2 is quick off the line to what? 30mph? (im sorry just bustin *****
if ur really interested in modding i would recommend the 2.0, or at least the 2.4. it doesnt seem like ur exactly loaded (like me) so starting off with the faster car with more aftermarket support is the right way to go
Originally Posted by PuSha050
if u intend on modding, get the 2.0 s/c... the 2.4 has been getting shafted with aftermarket support (mostly), although HPtuners just released their support for it.
in reality, if a 2.0 is out of ur budget, how are u going to afford the substantial modifications that it will take to make a 2.2 even catch up to s/c-forget the fact of going faster.. bc once u turbo the 2.2 to get it to go as fast as a stock 2.0, now u gotta build motor.. crazy $$$. not good for some1 on a budget
a 2.2 is quick off the line to what? 30mph? (im sorry just bustin *****
)
if ur really interested in modding i would recommend the 2.0, or at least the 2.4. it doesnt seem like ur exactly loaded (like me) so starting off with the faster car with more aftermarket support is the right way to go
in reality, if a 2.0 is out of ur budget, how are u going to afford the substantial modifications that it will take to make a 2.2 even catch up to s/c-forget the fact of going faster.. bc once u turbo the 2.2 to get it to go as fast as a stock 2.0, now u gotta build motor.. crazy $$$. not good for some1 on a budget
a 2.2 is quick off the line to what? 30mph? (im sorry just bustin *****
if ur really interested in modding i would recommend the 2.0, or at least the 2.4. it doesnt seem like ur exactly loaded (like me) so starting off with the faster car with more aftermarket support is the right way to go
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
XStylus
Redline Goods
17
Sep 3, 2015 10:30 AM



